http://www.countercurrents.org/wadia141108.htm


*Cheat Teachers*

*By Havovi Wadia*

14 November, 2008
*Countercurrents.org*

*E*ven as 'Teach India' becomes 'Teach for India' and says that education is
the 'biggest leveller', and that education for all children should be a
reality in a country as large and as 'developing' as ours, there appear to
me some contradictions in the professed aim of the campaign and the methods
it employs.

In their writing on the Right to Education, the Teach India campaign has
consistently used 'education' and 'literacy' as interchangeable terms and
quotes incidents of generosity and big heartedness as indications of the
contributions made in this direction. For instance, in their piece on the
"Teach for India" campaign , it quotes literacy rates in the country and
cites the 'Teach India' campaign as a 'modest way' to help address this
problem. To prove that their campaign has addressed the issue of "education"
, the following stories are cited: a businessman who distributed
dictionaries in a classroom, a senior citizen who brought tiffin for an
entire class. The "Teach for India" campaign, they say, aims to "provide
quality education to the underprivileged across a number of Indian cities".
The "Teach for India" web page says that the Times of India group believes
in "education and equity for social justice." (emphases mine)

It seems to me that if one believes in equity and social justice then one
must also believe that our children must get a free and equal quality of
education. In that case, the way to do this is to ensure that the state
takes responsibility for Article 21 and invests time, thought and political
will in strengthening the public school system in our country. How else will
we ensure that the Korkus in Melghat and the Pardhis in Marathwada get an
education that can put them on par with the students in Pune and Nagpur and
(dare I say it!) Mumbai.

As someone who has been a teacher for the first three years of her
professional life, I also feel disturbed at the casual way in which people
are seen as "qualified" to teach. It is bad enough that our teachers are
overworked, often underpaid and regularly undermined. Now their effort will
be put alongside twenty-somethings who are fluent in English, have had a
couple of months' training in teaching practice, two decades of the best
that life can offer (education, infrastructure, access to the facilities of
urban India) to back them, whose efforts are documented and splashed across
the pages of the leading English daily in this country... we don't have to
guess for long to realise what this will do. It will give energetic and
young students, volunteering as 'teachers' a sense of of philanthropic
fulfilment. And it will give teachers more reasons to feel marginalised and
undervalued and criticised.

I went to the University of Pune to do an MA in English Literature, fresh
out of St Xaviers College, Mumbai. I was one of 10 students in a class of
100 who was fluent in the language. Many of my classmates had rarely spoken
English before, but they all had BAs in English. 50 of my classmates came
from caste and tribe backgrounds that marked them as SC/ ST. It took me a
long time to understand the significance of an MA in English Literature in
the lives of those from Bid, Satara, Nashik, Sangamner, Buldana, Marathwada,
Vidarbha.... After putting in several hours of study a day for two years,
memorising a language that they had hardly been taught, many of my
classmates went on to do B.Eds in Baramati, Kolhapur and elsewhere because
they knew that would guarantee them employment back home. None of these
classmates of mine lacked in intelligence or effort. They just knew what
would work and what wouldn't in a system that is often built to defeat them.

I cannot support an intervention that is envisioned, not on the basis of
strengthening their skills and endorsing their commitment, but rather on
setting up a parallel system in which they would have no space.

We owe our teachers. And what we do in the name of 'teaching India' ignores
the conditions in which they teach and works towards reinforcing the notion
that theirs is a thankless job.

One could argue that I am selling the children short. That they deserve the
best teachers. I agree. They deserve TEACHERS, I say. Not volunteers
substituting for teachers. Volunteers supplementing teachers would be quite
another thing. That is what happens in the USA, where this model is being
lifted from. With a strong public school system, the programme in the USA
encourages educated citizens to contribute to the public school system. The
danger of putting the same model in place in a country which has an already
weakened public school system, where free and equal education for all has
not been realised for over 60 years, where curriculum, teacher training and
infrastructure all need investment of thought and energy and time.... I see
it as a gesture noble in intention, but counterproductive.

Let's for a moment, put aside the question of qualifications for teachers,
and equity and other things. For a brief while, let us consider the
difference between working on the Right to Education, and working towards
Education/Literacy (sic) for all. In the latter scheme, various NGOs and
well positioned and intentioned and perhaps even qualified citizens could
work in a relatively organised manner as volunteer teachers. This would mean
that those in areas around urban and semi-urban India would get a variety of
teachers and a rather eclectic "education". And all this would be dependent
on the generosity of the educated strata of our society. No worries there.

When we discuss Education as Right, the question is about things like:
increasing the number of schools to enable more children to go to school,
revamping the Bachelors of Education syllabus so that teachers are trained
in ways that ensure that Child Rights are upheld in the classroom, enabling
parents to participate in schools through PTAs, working with educationists
to build a flexible and relevant curriculum…In short, putting a system in
place that functions on the principle of equitable education for all.

The latter change involves changes in systems. Systems that will be in place
irrespective of economic slow downs, benevolent benefactors and the
existence of NGOs, Corporate Social Responsibility, etc. They can be
activated, ensured and monitored by the citizens whose children are the main
stakeholders in the system – that means each and every one of the citizens
of this country. The change is a vision, but why would a vision like this be
something not worth committing to?

This is not to say that nothing is accomplished by having several volunteers
contribute to teaching in various schools across the country. It is a good
thing – it helps the volunteers be in touch with realities beyond their own,
it helps students get variety in their teaching faculty, it would inject new
life into staff rooms…. I'd say, let us all work on a campaign to build a
resilient Education system. And then encourage participation from intern
teachers, volunteers etc.

The question is this: should a quality education be something that each
citizen in this country can ask for as a RIGHT? Or something that one has to
request from sensitive corporates, NGOs, other well educated people, and
proxy teachers?

I back the call from the Times of India "Join the movement to end
educational inequity in India". This movement, I believe needs to work
towards a system that gives EDUCATION to all the children of our country. It
requires a systematic belief in and campaign for schools in rural and
adivasi India, teachers who are trained by educationists who believe in
equity and justice, and a commitment to Education as a RIGHT, not as a
corporate philanthropic scheme.





-- 
Ranjit

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
 To post to this group, send email to greenyouth@googlegroups.com
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to