at present,the set back for the washington consensus has turned out to be new 
opportunities for an anti-neo-liberal alternative.How far it goes-a 
protectionist state with a welfare angle?


> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > [A very interesting observation from an ex-Director of
> the ADB.
> >
> > Despite the reassuring noises, there is a clear
> admission: "Nobody knows
> > nothing!" Incidentally, the Right and Centre are
> more forthcoming on this
> > count. The Left, however, mostly persists with its
> pompous all-knowing
> > arrogance.
> > The fact is that the system is so complex, turned even
> more so with
> > "globalisation" and astronomical expansion
> of the financial sector, its
> > future behaviour remains to a very large extent
> uncertain and, thereby,
> > unpredictable.
> > But still more significant, and in fact pretty
> comical, is the open and
> > ardent advocacy for Keynesianism and deficit financing
> overnight throwing
> > unceremoniuosly overboard the fundamental tenets of
> economic neo-liberalism
> > which was being tom-tommed as the final wisdom in the
> discipline of
> > Economics till last night.]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/TOP_ARTICLE__Forget_The_Great_Depression/rssarticleshow/4030739.cms
> >
> > TOP ARTICLE | Forget The Great Depression
> > 26 Jan 2009, 0010 hrs IST, Sudipto Mundle
> >
> >
> >
> > With rising unemployment, job losses and salary cuts,
> there is a great
> > deal of fear in Europe and America that the world is
> headed for
> > another
> > great depression. Following the crash of 1929
> thousands of businesses
> > collapsed across the world, millions lost their jobs
> and hunger
> > stalked the cities as well as the countryside. Some
> historians believe
> > it set the stage for the Second World War. Are we
> headed down a
> > similar path today? Nobody really knows, but there are
> compelling
> > reasons to believe that the final denouement may be
> much less severe
> > than in 1929
> >
> > The roots of the current global crisis lie in the
> interplay of several
> > developments that have fundamentally transformed the
> finance
> > capitalism that existed in 1929 or even as recently as
> just 30 years
> > ago. Traditionally banks were careful to lend only to
> trusted clients,
> > and carried the debt on their books. They bore the
> risk. Now there is
> > securitisation. Lenders pool the loans and resell them
> as asset-backed
> > securities. These securities are then repackaged,
> leveraged, tranched
> > and resold many times over. A second related
> development is the
> > emergence of highly sophisticated derivative products.
> Especially
> > important among these today are the credit default
> swaps (CDSs). Taken
> > together, asset-backed securities and derivatives
> widely spread the
> > risk, but they also breed complacency towards risk.
> The selling and
> > reselling of risk also lays the foundation for quick
> contagion.
> > Defaults on original loans at the base rapidly
> contaminate the entire
> > superstructure of assets and derivatives that rest on
> this base.
> >
> > The third key development is the rise of
> highly-leveraged investment
> > banks in the US. Commercial bank leveraging is limited
> by stringent
> > capital adequacy norms and their exposure to the
> capital market is
> > regulated under the Glass-Steagal Act. In contrast,
> till their recent
> > demise, Wall Street investment banks could raise and
> invest funds up
> > to 30 times their equity base, thus vastly increasing
> the fragility of
> > the system. Finally, there is globalisation of the
> financial system.
> > One aspect of this is a major imbalance between
> economic and political
> > power. China, India and other emerging economies in
> Asia and the
> > Middle East are now the creditors of the world,
> especially the US. Yet
> > they have little say in the design of the global
> financial
> > architecture. Another aspect of this is technological.
> Billions of
> > dollars can now be transmitted instantaneously across
> the globe. But
> > so can market information and market sentiments,
> unleashing huge waves
> > of exuberance or fear among investors.
> >
> > Securitisation, derivatives, leveraging and
> globalisation have made
> > the global economy much more volatile and risky than
> the world of
> > 1929. However, there is another major development that
> provides
> > comforting insurance against such risks of global
> systemic collapse.
> > Out of the great depression was born Keynesian
> economics. In 1929,
> > governments had relatively little understanding of
> macroeconomic
> > management. Today, governments and central banks have
> many tools to
> > restore confidence and revive the economy. The pace at
> which the US
> > subprime loan defaults snowballed into a global
> financial crisis was
> > astonishing, but so was the speed with which the G-7
> country
> > authorities and emerging market economies responded.
> >
> > In a period of less than two months after the collapse
> of Lehman
> > Brothers, the advanced countries and emerging
> economies had all
> > introduced broadly similar measures to deal with the
> crisis, a
> > remarkable feat of global coordination without a
> single formal treaty
> > or agreement. The initial interventions were followed
> up with further
> > measures to revive demand and the flow of credit. Now,
> with President
> > Barack Obama ready to launch a recovery package worth
> trillions of
> > dollars, the US is about to resume leadership of the
> Keynesian path to
> > global recovery.
> >
> > It is difficult to fully comprehend the depth of the
> global crisis in
> > a country like India that will record growth of around
> 7 per cent for
> > fiscal 2008 at a time when most developed countries
> are shrinking.
> > Some sectors like exports, real estate, textiles, IT
> and transport
> > equipment have been affected severely. But overall,
> the impact has
> > been limited, thanks in no small measure to the prompt
> and sustained
> > measures taken by the RBI and the government. The
> markets have
> > stabilised. The decline of the rupee has been
> arrested. The stock
> > market has started recovering, the Satyam shock
> notwithstanding, and
> > the flow of credit is reviving.
> >
> > The important question is what more should the
> government do now to
> > contain the expected decline in growth in fiscal 2009.
> Critics point
> > out that most of the steps so far have been monetary
> measures to ease
> > the supply of credit, few fiscal measures to revive
> demand. Beyond a
> > point, that is like pushing on a loose string if the
> binding growth
> > constraint is now on the demand side. Actually, a very
> substantial
> > fiscal stimulus has been provided through the
> supplementary demand for
> > grants in September and a second supplementary demand
> in December.
> >
> > This should be followed by a large deficit in the
> budget for fiscal
> > 2009, ignoring the FRBM for now. Also, a part of the
> deficit should be
> > monetised, temporarily shelving the agreement that the
> RBI will not
> > finance central government debt, in order to minimise
> the crowding out
> > of private borrowers. The government is currently
> focusing on
> > additional spending on infrastructure. This is
> welcome. However, it
> > should also target additional spending on education
> and health. There
> > is compelling research evidence that such spending is
> not only more
> > effective than infrastructure spending in reviving
> current demand, but
> > also more effective in enhancing future growth
> potential.
> >
> > The writer was a director with the Asian Development
> Bank.
> >
> >


      Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to 
http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
 To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to