http://www.tehelka.com/story_main41.asp?filename=Ne210209proscons.asp

Policing The Police

An AP High Court ruling will force the men in uniform to be accountable

SURESH KUMAR


Illustration: ANAND NAOREM

OVER THE last four decades, the Andhra Pradesh police have killed
6,000 people in fake encounters. Some 2,000 were killed in just the
last decade. Yet, no policeman was prosecuted. The reason: the police
never book the policemen involved in the encounter. Every time an
inquiry by an executive magistrate accepted the police version that
the police returned fire after being shot at. Case closed.

Not any more. In a historic judgment on February 6, on a petition
filed by the Andhra Pradesh Civil Liberties Committee (APCLC), the
Andhra Pradesh High Court ruled that the police must file a First
Information Report (FIR) every time a death occurs at their hands, and
bring the case before a judge. The court said the local police
officer's report would only be an "opinion" and not a conclusive
finding. Importantly, the court ruled an executive inquiry won't be
the final word on such deaths.

This ruling is a sterling blow in favour of India's human rights
movement. It is important to quote the five Justices: G Raghuram, VVS
Rao, R Subhash Reddy, Ramesh Ranganathan, and G Bhawani Prasad.

"Where a police officer causes death of a person acting or purporting
to act in discharge of official duties in self-defence as the case may
be, the first information relating to such circumstances shall be
recorded and registered as FIR, enumerating the relevant provision of
the law, and shall be investigated.

"The existence of circumstances bringing the case within any of the
exceptions in IPC [Indian Penal Code], including the exercise of the
right of private defence, cannot be conclusively determined during
investigation. The opinion recorded by investigating officer in the
final report to the magistrate is only an opinion. Such opinion shall
be considered by the [judicial] magistrate in the context of record of
investigation together with the material and evidence collected during
the course of the investigation. The [judicial] magistrate shall
critically examine the entirety of the evidence collected during
investigation to ascertain whether the opinion of the IO
[Investigating Officer] is borne out by the record of investigation.
The [judicial] magistrate has the discretion to disregard the opinion
and take cognisance of the offence.

"A magisterial inquiry [inquest] is neither a substitute nor an
alternative to the obligation to record the information as FIR and to
conduct investigation into the facts and circumstances of the case, if
necessary to take measures for the discovery and arrest of offenders."

APCLC filed the case before the High Court after the police killed
eight people, including Communist Party of India (Maoist) leader
Madhav, in a fake encounter on July 22, 2006, in the Naramalla forests
of Prakasam district. Those killed included five women.

The judges, however, said it was "not necessary" to rule on our plea
that the policemen who took part in the encounter be named. The Andhra
Pradesh police do not mention their names even in the post-encounter
reports.

This judgment will change the face of the encounter business in Andhra
Pradesh. So far there has been no punishment for the police. In 1996,
the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) probed six encounter cases
brought by the APCLC and ordered that FIRs be registered in five of
them. At the time of the NHRC inquiry, police officers would threaten
witnesses to discourage them from testifying.

In June 2006, a CrPC amendment said judicial and not executive
magistrates shall probe deaths caused by the police. But police all
over India refused to put this into practice. The latest judgment will
hopefully trigger a nationwide movement to deter the police from
killing innocent people.

Kumar is a civil rights lawyer with APCLC


>From Tehelka Magazine, Vol 6, Issue 7, Dated Feb 21, 2009


-- 
Ranjit

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
 To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to