*Economies of change*

*Chandrabhan Prasad*

It was May 2008 when was I travelling by a Bihar-bound train from Delhi to
Lucknow. Disobeying the law, I was smoking and hence stood at the gate. A
Bihar-born immigrant family was trying to catch the train. The train had
begun moving, and the second class coach had passed. The family —
proletariat by all standards, was trying to board the AC II coach in which I
was traveling. The family — husband, wife, and three kids could some how
manage to catch the train. I along with my co-smoker helped them enter the
coach.

We consoled the proletariat family, and assured that we will help them
transfer to the second class coach. I was going to the Uttar Pradesh
countryside for a study — “Food habits, occupation and lifestyle changes
amongst Dalits.” I found a ready subject in that family. I asked them
questions relating to the goods the family was carrying. Among many things,
the family was carrying a pressure cooker, a cheap cell phone set, and
clothing for other family members back home. As the family revealed, the
pressure cooker was for their family, and the cell phone was a gift meant
for a relative whose daughter was getting married the next week.

This April, I visited few Kolam villages in the district of Yavatmal,
Maharashtra. Kolam is a primitive Tribe, and many Kolam boys and girls are
using shampoo to wash their hair. Shampoo pouches are available for 50
paisa.

In the apartment I live in Delhi, almost all desert coolers have been
replaced by air-conditioners. The family that had window ACs are now
switching over to split AC sets. Many families in the apartment I live in
are replacing their old TV sets by LCD TVs. A couple of weeks back, a
relative of mine got married. I could not attend his marriage because of
General Election. The groom side was upset because the bride side didn’t
serve cold drinks to the wedding party guests.

There are funnier sides to things happening in this country. I am told of an
interesting story. An ex-landlord’s family has turned poor. The family sold
off most of the land they once had to maintain the lifestyle they were used
to. That ex-landlord’s family couldn’t afford to buy a TV set, but have a
large house built decades back. The household head bought an antenna and
installed on his roof top. In public perception, the family has a TV set.

The thinking India has missed some thing strange happening inside the
society. All of a sudden, material markers are gaining grounds over social
markers. Economics has come to lead the politics and that’s what seems to
have caused Congress’ stunning victory. If the rich in the urban India are
replacing small cars with bigger ones, the poor in the countryside are
aspiring for bicycles. Rich or the poor, most Indians are now swayed by
material goods. Not that all poor have come to possess bicycles or TV sets,
not that all the rich families have bought luxury cars, but they at least
aspiring for these worldly goods.

Contrary to the new mood of the society, losing political players sold
something else in these elections. Expected to do well this time BJP sold
the slogan of “Strong Leader, Decisive Government”. Voters seem to have shot
back- “What is this”? The Left came with the politically correct slogan — “A
non-BJP, non-Congress Secular Government?” The voters seem to have responded
by saying “Get Lost”? The BSP sold the slogan of “Dalit ki beti as PM.”
Voters seem to have asked — “Why not a Bharat ki Beti as PM”? With few
notable exceptions, regional warlords too have been denied their ‘State’
nationalism.

The Congress on the other hand, invariably talked of nuclear deal, economic
growth and the youth power. Of the billion plus Indians, 75 per cent are
aged below 45 years. In other words, Congress could connect to the majority
of Indians who in search of shampoo pouches, pressure cookers, cell phones,
bicycles, large cars and split AC sets. The Congress triumphed and
brutalised both the opponents and poll pundits.

What the thinking India seems to be missing is that howsoever socially
diverse India may be, with diverse and multiple identities, at one point of
time there can only be one particular identity presiding over the of rest
the sub-identities. In this election, economics led the politics.




-- 
Ranjit

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
 To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to