http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Delhi-High-Court-legalizes-homosexuality/articleshow/4726608.cms

Delhi High Court legalizes homosexuality

 NEW DELHI: In a historic judgement, the Delhi High
Court<http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Delhi-High-Court-legalizes-homosexuality/articleshow/4726608.cms#>on
Thursday decriminalized homosexuality by striking down section 377 of
the
Indian
Penal Code. The Section 377 of the IPC as far as it criminalizes gay sex
among consenting adults is violation of fundamental rights, said the high
court. However, Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code which criminalizes
homosexuality, will continue for non-consensual and non-vaginal sex.

Any kind of discrimination is anti-thesis of right to equality, said the
court, while allowing plea of gay rights activists for decriminalization of
homosexuality.

A bench of Chief Justice Ajit Prakash Shah and Justice S Muralidhar said
that if not amended, section 377 of the IPC would violate Article 21 of the
Indian constitution, which states that every citizen has equal opportunity
of life and is equal before
law<http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Delhi-High-Court-legalizes-homosexuality/articleshow/4726608.cms#>.


Section 377, a law from the British Raj era, says homosexuality and
"unnatural sex" is a criminal act.

While the home ministry wanted the petition to be dismissed, the health
ministry supported its contention that section 377 criminalized
homosexuality per se, it was obstructing the AIDS/HIV prevention efforts
among high-risk groups. Whatever the outcome, this is the second time the
Delhi high court will be pronouncing on Naz Foundation’s petition against
section 377. In 2004, it dismissed the petition at the preliminary stage
stating that “an academic challenge to the constitutionality of a
legislative provision could not be entertained.” It further said that when
no personal injury was caused to the petitioner by this provision, the
petition could not be examined.

The foundation then approached the Supreme Court, which disapproved the
manner in which the high court had disposed of the matter. SC observed that
when there was a debate on this issue the world over, “where is the question
of the petition being academic? We are not able to accept the approach of
the high court that it is an academic exercise and there is no personal
injury.” Accordingly, in 2006, SC directed HC to reconsider the matter in
detail. The judgment is coming close on the heels of statements from
ministers on the possibility of a legislative intervention because of
growing demands from the community of
lesbians<http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Delhi-High-Court-legalizes-homosexuality/articleshow/4726608.cms#>,
gays, bisexuals and transgenders (LGBT). If the judgment serves the purpose
of decriminalizing homosexuality, the government will be spared the burden
of amending a provision laden with religious and cultural sensitivities.

Interestingly, in the new team of law officers appointed by the government,
at least two of them — attorney general Goolam Vahanvati and additional
solicitor general Indira Jaising —- have publicly supported the demand for
decriminalizing homosexuality.


-- 
"Sometimes — quite often — the same people who are capable of a radical
questioning of, say, economic neo-liberalism or the role of the state, are
deeply conservative socially — about women, marriage, sexuality, our
so-called 'family values' — sometimes they're so doctrinaire that you don't
know where the establishment stops and the resistance begins. For example,
how many Gandhian/Maoist/ Marxist Brahmins or upper caste Hindus would be
happy if their children married Dalits or Muslims, or declared themselves to
be gay? Quite often, the people whose side you're on, politically, have
absolutely no place for a person like you in their social, cultural or
religious imagination.That's a knotty problem politically radical people can
come at you with the most breathtakingly conservative social views and make
nonsense of the way in which you have ordered your world and your way of
thinking about it and you have to find a way of accommodating these
contradictions within your worldview."
                                      -Arundhati Roy

ANIL

Anil Tharayath Varghese
New Delhi-110058
INDIA
Mobile - 09971170738
email -  [email protected]

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
 To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to