ASIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION   URGENT APPEALS PROGRAMME

Urgent Appeal Case: AHRC-UAC-096-2009

 <http://www.ahrchk.net/ua/support.php?ua=UAC-096-2009 >

12 August 2009

---------------------------------------------------------------------


INDIA: 35 Dalit families face a social boycott while the destruction
of their burial ground goes unpunished

ISSUES: Discrimination; caste system; police negligence; right to
food

---------------------------------------------------------------------


Dear friends,

The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) has learned that all the
lowest caste (Dalit) families in a Bhavnagar District village are
living under boycott conditions, which deny them employment, access
to water, the use of village shops or public roads, and any contact
with non-Dalits. The boycott was started by Brahmins after Dalits
registered a complaint with the police against high caste persons for
destroying and stealing from their burial grounds. Twelve out of
thirty five families have already had to leave the village.

CASE DETAILS:

According to information received information from Navsarjan, a
Gujarat-based NGO, a plot of land was given to the Dalits of
Karmadiya village (Karmadiya Village, Mahuva, Bhavnagar) by the local
government several years ago to be used as a burial ground. But on 19
April 2009 three Brahmin (highest caste) men were seen taking land
from the plot to the agricultural fields; their tractor made
approximately 50 trips.

At the Bagdana police station that day fifteen Dalits lodged a
complaint against the three men: Bharatbhai Girdharbai Ladhva,
Kanubhai Girdharbhai Ladhva and Vallbhbhai Jivabhai Ladhva, but
though the police station took the application they refused to
register a First Information Report (FIR). This is needed to start
legal proceedings. On 23 April Dalit activists arrived in Karmadiya
and after hours of petitions, police registered the FIR at 1am.

The next evening the Deputy Superintendent of Police (Dy.SP), Mr.
B.D. Rabari arrived in the village to record statements and tried to
broker an unofficial compromise. The Dalits refused, preferring to
pursue their case in court where their rights are more likely to be
vindicated. They also demanded police protection from the Dy SP. One
police officer arrived later that night and stayed for two days.

After two meetings were seen taking place   at the home of the
Sarpanch (head of the village council), Balashankar Keshubhai Ladhva
and another man Kanubhai Girdharbhai Ladhva   the boycott was
announced. Non-Dalits were told that they would be fined Rs5000 for
making any kind of economic or social contact with the lowest caste
members. The Dalits were allegedly told that those who used the
public roads would have their legs broken.

Before the boycott, all earning Dalits worked on land owned by
Brahmins or Patels and just twenty Dalit families own land (a total
of 15 vigas), but these only yield crops for one season each year
because of the lack of irrigation. Members of the community are
depending on relatives for support and for loans, but children are
finding it difficult to get school supplies and other students have
started to call them dheda (a derogatory caste-based term). The women
worry about the safety of themselves and their daughters, and report
feeling vulnerable outside the Dalit area.

The stresses and physical difficulties of life in such a hostile
environment has forced twelve families to leave the village, and the
others fear that they may soon to follow.

Acts of retaliation, including boycotts and ostracism, often take
place when a Dalit makes a legal complaint against a dominant-caste
member. It is the responsibility of police to take preventative
measures for these, as stated in Section 3 of the Scheduled
Caste/Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) (SC/ST) Rules,
1989. These include the immediate arrest of possible perpetrators to
prevent reprisals, the immediate provision of police protection
(Rules 3(1)(x), 6(2)(iii), 6(2)(iv), and 12(2)(3)), the imposition of
a collective fine (16), the removal of anyone likely to commit an
offense (SC/ST Act 10), and the denial of bail (SC/ST Act ยง18). More
on this act and the procedures and protections laid out by it can be
found in our previous appeals on social boycotts, such as:
UAC-095-2009 <http://www.ahrchk.net/ua/mainfile.php/2009/3231>
.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION:

Since ancient times Indian society has categorised its members into
castes. At birth Indians are thrust into a hierarchical world of
haves and have-nots, their destiny and human worth determined by
family lineage and social custom. Those born into the upper castes,
such as the Brahmins or the Darbars, are automatically given the
privilege of 'purity'. On the bottom rung, Dalits are considered akin
to the dregs of civilization; others avoid physical and social contact
with them, rendering them 'untouchable'.

For thousands of years 'untouchables' have conducted the duties of a
polluted class, from the delivery of bad news to the handling of
excrement and of the dead. Society ensures that there is no dignity
in being a Dalit. Seen as second-class human beings in the natural
order, opportunities for self-improvement and advancement for the
lowest caste are very few.

They are subjected to constant discrimination. Violence committed
against them draws less interest or commitment from the authorities,
leaving them vulnerable and cut off from the usual mechanisms of
justice. The constraints they live with lead to extreme levels of
poverty, hunger, squalor and ignorance. The right to grow
emotionally, intellectually and even physically is denied them; they
essentially live stunted lives. Women face the worst in this
patriarchal society, and more often than not the duties that are
relegated to the Dalits are given to them.

Legislation has been created to ban Untouchability and protect
Dalits, but in practice it is often ignored by the authorities and
hampered by the fixed perceptions of social identity, especially in
rural areas. Discrimination against Dalits is severely undermining
the advancement of a just, modern Indian society

Please take a look at our previous appeal, UAC-095-2009
<http://www.ahrchk.net/ua/mainfile.php/2009/3231>
, for more information on the International Convention on the
Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, plus a detailed
look at the state of current laws.

SUGGESTED ACTION:

Please send letters to the authorities listed below expressing your
concern in this case. The AHRC will also contact the Special
Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination,
xenophobia and related intolerance calling for an intervention in
this case.

To support this appeal please click here:
<http://www.ahrchk.net/ua/support.php?ua=UAC-096-2009 >

SAMPLE LETTER:

Dear ________,

INDIA: 35 Dalit families face a social boycott while the destruction
of their burial ground goes unpunished

Names of victims:

1. The Dalit community residing in Karmadiya Village (35 families)

Names of alleged perpetrators:

1. Bharatbhai Girdharbai Ladhva (Brahmin)

2. Kanubhai Girdharbhai Ladhva (Brahmin)

3. Vallbhbhai Jivabhai Ladhva (Brahmin)

4. Balashankar Keshubhai Ladhva, Sarpanch (village council head) of
Karmadiya village

5. Kanubhai Girdharbhai Ladhva, (Brahmin)

6. Police officers of Bagdana station

All residing at Karmadiya village

As well as the other involved members of the non-Dalit community at
Karmadiya Village

Date of incident: 19 to 24 April 2009

Place of incident: Karmadiya Village, Mahuva, Bhavnagar District

I am writing to express my concern about a case of caste-based
discrimination against and social boycotting of a Dalit community, as
reported from Karmadiya Village, Mahuva, Bhavnagar District. I am
informed by Navsarjan, a human rights NGO based in Gujarat, that the
entire non-Dalit community in the village is behind the incident.

A social boycott was allegedly put into place after Dalits tried to
file charges against three non-Dalits for trespassing onto their
burial grounds and stealing soil, causing approximately Rs 50,000
worth of damage. The Dalits were banned from economic or social
interaction with non-Dalits and any non-Dalit that breaks the boycott
will allegedly be fined 5000 rupees by the wider community. Dalits
were told that their legs would be broken if they used public roads.

I am also concerned about the way in which the police handled the
case. Officers at Bagdana station initially refused to register a
First Information Report (FIR). They finally registered the FIR at
1am on April 24 police after hours of pressure from Dalit activists.
The FIR was not written as dictated by the complainants and relevant
information was omitted. But most importantly, the social boycott has
not been officially recognised by the Social Welfare Department, and
so no attempts towards relief, compensation and rehabilitation have
been made by the government.

These incidents are clearly in violation of not only the Dalit
people s fundamental human rights, but also of the Scheduled
Castes/Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (1989), the
Protection of Civil Rights Act (1955) and the International
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination
(1966), ratified by India in 1968. As was highlighted by the United
Nations Committee on Elimination of Racial Discrimination s report on
India in 2007, the practice of Untouchability continues largely
unfettered.

I therefore request that:

1. An investigation be ordered into the social boycott practiced
against the victims in Karmadiya village by the Social Welfare
Office, and the findings made public;

2. If the allegations are true, that the victims be paid appropriate
compensation for property damage as well as economic and social
rehabilitation, as entitled under the SC/ST Act;

3. A First Information Report (FIR) be immediately registered by a
police officer of a rank not below that of the Deputy Superintendent
of Police, that includes all relevant and proper sections of the
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act

4. A proper case be registered under the provisions of the Scheduled
Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989,
against the social boycott in particular, against all the accused.

5. The boycott and migration be officially recognized and declared by
the Social Welfare Department for as long as necessary;

6. Police protection be provided for as long as necessary;

7. The village Sarpanch (council leader) be suspended immediately.

Yours sincerely,

--------

PLEASE SEND YOUR LETTERS TO:

1. Secretary of Department of Social Justice and Empowerment

Government of Gujarat

Block No.5, 8th Floor

Sachivalaya

Gandhinagar

Gujarat

INDIA

2. Directorate of Scheduled Caste Welfare

Secretary of Department of Social Justice and Empowerment

Government of Gujarat

Block No.5, 8th Floor

Sachivalaya

Gandhinagar

Gujarat

INDIA

3. Director General of Police

Police Bhawan Sector   18

Gandhinagar

Gujarat 382 009

INDIA

Fax: + 91 177 23253918

4. Minister of Social Justice and Empowerment

Government of India

Shastri Bhawan

Dr Rajendra Prasad Road

New Delhi - 110 001

INDIA

Fax + 91 11 23384918

5. Chairperson

National Human Rights Commission

Faridkot House, Copernicus Marg

New Delhi 110001

INDIA

Fax + 91 11 2338 6521

E-mail: [email protected]

6. Chairperson

National Commission for Scheduled Castes

5th Floor

Lok Nayak Bhawan

Khan Market

New Delhi 110 003

INDIA

E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected]

--------------------------

Thank you.

Urgent Appeals Programme

Asian Human Rights Commission ([email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
)

 <http://www.ahrchk.net/ua/support.php?ua=UAC-096-2009 >



-----------------------------
Asian Human Rights Commission
19/F, Go-Up Commercial Building,
998 Canton Road, Kowloon, Hongkong S.A.R.
Tel: +(852) - 2698-6339 Fax: +(852) - 2698-6367

-- 
W A Laskar
Freelance Reporter and Human Rights Activist
with Barak Human Rights Protection Committee,
http://bhrpc.net.googlepages.com
15, Panjabari Road, Darandha, Six Mile,
Guwahati-781037, Assam, India
Cell: +919401134314

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
 To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to