Respected friends Sarathi and Kavita Krishnan My all endeavors were to use words that might not be inconvenient to anyone. But if these words were inconvenient to you then I am really sorry and if you point out those words which are masqueraded by patriarchal 'common sense' then i would try my level best to alter them. kindly guide me. Only because of my conduct you have to use that extreme language - I feel really empathetic to you.
So far as the allegation is concerned no amount of vituperation can substitute a good argument. A passage cannot be called wrong or incorrect merely on the ground that it does not meet your expectations or suit your convenience. We all have freedom of expression and we ought to respect it to others also. If you did not find it matching your expectations then you may please leave it or ignore it. And I think the matter will be sorted out. So far as my view is concerned I had obtained hundreds of views either online or in personal interviews. To me your expression is "Two More" among those earlier ones. I accept your expressions with great respect for you and your expression. But I am sure that you will not miss this opportunity to explain the community "Green Youth Movement" as to how that expression lacked a study behind it or how it carried a particular categorization you preferred to name it. *WHAT I MISSED IN PREVIOUS REPLY IS THAT*: MAY I REQUEST YOU TO PLEASE GO THROUGH A PSYCHOLOGICAL ESSAY ON MY WEBSITE - The Learned Ones are Full of Cognitive Dissonance available at the url http://www.psmalik.com/articlehub/41-i/56-learned-ones-are-full-of-cognitive-dissonance.html. NOTE: *this is merely a request to broaden the horizon of discussion and I by no stretch of imagination pursuade to correct or amend your views. I respect them fully as they are.* with regards rajni On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 2:09 AM, sarathi <[email protected]> wrote: > > KAVITA IS RIGHT - [email protected] > > On 26 Nov, 11:10, Kavita Krishnan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Research on domestic violence cannot be conducted through online > > 'questionaires', that too those worded in a way that displays ignorance > of > > social science and lack of any familiarity with the women's movement, > rather > > couched in the language of patriarchal tradition. Green Youth should not > > give credence to such patriarchal 'common sense' > > masquerading as 'research.' > > Kavita Krishnan, AIPWA > > > > 2009/11/25 rajni <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > Domestic Violence Act – A Research > > > > > In a live society there are always conflicting interests. More live a > > > society is more conflicting the relations amongst its members would > > > be. The logic is simple. The society is going to attain a new > > > destination and the positions of the members inter alia (amongst them) > > > would also be redefined and future gains of the members would depend > > > on their new positions. According to this logic each constituent of a > > > society is always in a conflicting mode with others. This conflict is > > > merely a conflict of interests and it does not mean an enmity. > > > > > Independent Indian society has witnessed a lot of similar conflicts of > > > interests. One such area of conflicts has been the home of this > > > society. The basic structure of the ‘Home’ has also seen a shift in > > > its appearance. An Indian home was basically conceived on The > > > Principle of Division of Labor. > > > > > Traditionally the husband was given a duty to provide the resources > > > from outside and the wife was supposed to ‘Build a Home’ with those > > > resources. It was a home in which the next generation was nurtured > > > ‘Homely’ by the wife in the capacity of a mother. Husband, now father > > > was to show torch to that ‘Next Generation’ after it had attained a > > > particular level of maturity, which sometimes varied or on other times > > > lost its very peculiarities. > > > > > With the spread of western education a new value system was inculcated > > > in the Indian society. Women started coming out of the ‘Home’ and > > > earning in equality with men. The age-old ‘Labor – Division’ of Indian > > > Home was thwarted. It is not the objective here to count the merits or > > > demerits of such a new value system but what it did, certainly it > > > blurred the traditional roles of men and women in the society and also > > > in the ‘Home’. > > > > > Now both men and women started working in the same sphere and with an > > > axiom of political equality their relations were soon started being > > > regulated under the shadow of State Authority i.e. the Law. Laws were > > > legislated and implemented. Men alleged that these laws placed them at > > > an adverse position while women claimed that they were socio- > > > historically placed adversely in the traditional ‘Marriage System’ and > > > the laws just tried to emancipate them from that adversity. > > > For a complete study click: > > > Domestic Violence Act – A Research > > >http://www.psmalik.com/a-research-on-dva.html > > > My website:http://www.psmalik.com/ > > > My Blogs:http://www.psmalik.com/article-hub.html > > > Blogs on Wordpress:http://www.psmalik.com/wpblogs > > > This Article:http://www.psmalik.com/a-research-on-dva.html > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
