<[email protected]>
*PRESS NOTE*

 *TOXIC WASTE DUMPING FROM JAPAN ON THE ANVIL?*

 *Civil Society Groups Demand Access to Draft Agreement Between Japan &
India*

 New Delhi/29/12/2009: Civil society groups demand that the contents of the
proposed comprehensive economic agreement (CEPA) between Japan and India and
the detail of lists of goods and commodities in it must be made public. This
demand comes in the wake of Japan’s consistent promotion of hazardous
technologies like Dioxins machines and its quest for garbage dumps in places
which offer least resistance is well known.

  Manmohan Singh’s opening remarks at the Joint Press Interaction with his
Japanese counterpart on December 29, 2009,* “*We have decided to expedite
our negotiations on the Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement in
order to conclude a high quality and balanced agreement. We are hopeful that
this can be completed in time for the next Annual Summit meeting” has been
greeted with worries

 There is an apprehension that the proposed CEPA would include lists of
toxic waste that are considered goods or commodities. It will justify the
definition of waste as non-waste through a re-classification exercise in
linguistic corruption flux of hazardous waste from Japan.

 The list entails hazardous wastes that are categorized as goods are
residual products, sewage sludge, medical waste, waste from chemical or
allied industries, vessels, incinerator ash, oil-contaminated products and
nuclear waste.

Indian government is currently in the process of negotiating free trade
agreements (FTA) or Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA)/Comprehensive
Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) with Japanese government which is
likely to have adverse impact on health and environment of the citizens. So
far twelve rounds of negotiations have been held to conclude a mutually
acceptable agreement.

In December, 2006, the Prime Ministers of the Japan and India decided to
launch immediate negotiations for the conclusion of a bilateral Economic
Partnership Agreement/Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement aiming to
complete in substance as soon as possible in approximately two years. It is
feared that the agreement is likely to facilitate trade of toxic wastes from
Japan to India. Civil society groups have demanded that the hazardous
technologies and globally controlled or banned wastes and substances must be
excluded from the negotiations in the proposed CEPA. These groups have
written letters to both the governments.

At their meeting in New Delhi, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and the
Japanese premier Yukio Hatoyama decided expedite negotiations on CEPA so as
to conclude it by next year. The manner in "main concerns" and need for
“resolving the remaining issues” is being talked reveals the
non-transparency in the way trade negotiations being held. The CEPA being
negotiated is being conducted in secret and the government is doing little
to consult public interest groups in these negotiations. Similar agreements
with Philippines and Thailand contain provisions allowing the dumping of
waste, which is typical of FTAs being negotiated by Japan. Similar
agreements negotiated and ratified by Japan with Singapore, Malaysia and the
Philippines have the goal of facilitating trade, and are primarily
accomplished by reducing tariffs to zero on selected goods.

Civil society groups are worried that by including toxic wastes and other
banned substances in the list of goods enjoying preferential tariffs a
market environment is created providing an incentive for waste traders to
step in and exploit.

***Japan has been trying to make **UN's Basel
Convention[i<http://www.ban.org/ban_news/2007/070219_demand_elimination.html#i>],
and its Basel Ban
Amendment[ii<http://www.ban.org/ban_news/2007/070219_demand_elimination.html#ii>]
to become ineffective so that it can transfer hazardous wastes by defining
it as hazardous materials** (meant for recycling) in the CEPA. The
connivance of Indian officials in such acts of manufacturing legitimacy for
hazardous waste trade is unpardonable. Notably, Indian Supreme Court has
banned the trade in hazardous wastes but its orders are being violated with
impunity and the agreement is yet another way to outwit the court order.
*

In Indian case too quite like the Filipinos, the draft CEPA is not being
shared with the public interest groups. Once the agreement is signed between
the two countries there would be no way of getting critiques of the treaty
considered. Negotiations between India and Japan are conducted under a veil
of secrecy.

*The civil society groups reiterate their demands to both Japanese and
Indian officials which are as under: *All listings of toxic technology and
internationally controlled or banned wastes and substances are expunged from
tariff reduction provisions and other exploitative provisions are removed
from CEPA and for this condition to be added to the Terms of Reference of
the negotiations, Ratification of the Basel Convention's Ban Amendment is
accomplished by the two countries at the earliest possible date, Civil
society groups are accorded representation and participation in the ongoing
negotiations of CEPA, and be given access to all relevant information
pertaining to the CEPA negotiations, CEPA negotiations are made open and
transparent and a serious program to prevent hazardous and other wastes at
source via toxics use reductions, stopping planned obsolescence should be
part of CEPA, as well as holding Japanese and Indian manufacturers
accountable for the products they produce.

*For Details*: Gopal Krishna, ToxicsWatch, Mb: 9818089660, E-mail:
[email protected], Web: toxicswatch.blogpsot.com

Notes: [i] The Basel Convention on the Transboundary Movement of Hazardous
Wastes and its Disposal comprises of 169 member countries to date. The
Convention requires all countries to take national responsibility for
managing their own waste within their own national borders, as well as
setting rules on exports that must take place. The , and has passed numerous
decisions forbidding exports of hazardous wastes from rich to poorer
countries. See: www.basel.int.

[ii] Formally known as Decision III/1, the Basel Ban Amendment was passed in
1995 which prohibits the exports, for disposal or recycling, of hazardous
wastes from rich to poorer countries.

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB.


Reply via email to