---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: K M Venugopalan <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:42 PM
Subject: Article from SocialistWorker.org
To: [email protected]


Hope you will find this article "Youth,Sexuality and the Left"interesting.

View original article here:

http://socialistworker.org/2010/03/02/youth-sexuality-and-the-left

Comment: Sherry Wolf
======== YOUTH, SEXUALITY AND THE LEFT =======================================

March 2, 2010

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

SocialistWorker.org contributor Sherry Wolf is the author of the popular new
book /Sexuality and Socialism: History, Politics and Theory of LGBT
Liberation/ [1]. Last week, the left wing Web site MRZine published a harshly
critical review [2] of /Sexuality and Socialism/ by David Thorstad. Wolf
wrote the following response--MRZine has so far refused to publish it.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

I DON'T usually respond to screeds, but David Thorstad's railings about my
book, /Sexuality and Socialism/, were posted on MRZine, which I often find a
useful source for socialists and the left generally.

I won't bother to waste time here challenging his position that the left
should abandon the dynamic social movements for equal marriage and other LGBT
civil rights because to him these movements are not radical enough. I've
written widely about this elsewhere [3], and Thorstad needs to get past
Luxemburg's title page of /Reform or Revolution/ to absorb that her argument
is against reform/ism/, not the fight for reforms.

There are other lavender herrings he tosses out about my supposed closet
allegiance to the Democrats, based on the fuzzy micro-image of a Hillary
sticker worn by a woman in a protest photo on the cover of the book, which I
frankly had never noticed before--if only David's insight were the match of
his eyesight.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

THE ESSENCE of Thorstad's piece is a defense of man-boy love, or pederasty,
and a call for socialists to defend the right of adult men to have sex with
young boys. As a founding member of the North American Man-Boy Love
Association (NAMBLA), which he curiously omits from his bioline for the
"review," Thorstad is perhaps the most vocal long-time defender of pederasty
on the left.

He takes issue with the position I pose in the book and argues, "Wolf
recycles bourgeois prejudice when it comes to intergenerational love...she
repeats the foolish notion that a boy under the magical age of consent
(whatever it happens to be) is by definition incapable of consenting to sex
with a man."

My position in the book is: "Whatever the wrongs of age-of-consent
legislation that carry over into the modern era, it should stand as a basic
socialist principle that sex between two people must be consensual. It is
incompatible for genuine consent devoid of the inequality of power to be
given by a child to a man of 30."

I stand by this argument and believe others on the left are right to do so as
well. Children are sexual beings, and /Sexuality and Socialism/ comes out
fiercely against the puritanical abstinence-only, anti-sex education they
receive in public schools. However, adults and children do not approach each
other as emotional, physical, social or economic equals in our society.
Children and young teens do not have the maturity, experience or power to
make truly free decisions about their relationships with adults. Without
those, there can be no genuine consent.

For the record, I do not believe a 19-year-old should be prosecuted for
having consensual sex with a minor of 15. However, Thorstad conflates his
man-boy love advocacy with opposition to the state's often oppressive and
ineffective age-of-consent laws, which sometimes target youth, predominantly
minorities, who are just over the age line for having consensual sex with
minors just a few years younger than themselves.

But while opposing the state's use of these laws and acknowledging that teens
mature at different ages, the left should not deny the very real assaults and
rapes by older men and women against young boys and girls that have mangled
the lives and psyches of millions.

This is precisely what Thorstad does regarding the scandals swirling around
the Catholic Church, which he reduces to guilt-ridden, money-grubbing adult
men looking to bilk the Church after they willingly partook in sex with
priests as kids. He writes in "Pederasty and Homosexuality":

>Of course, money plays a role in this, too. This is very clear, for example,
>in the many scandals in the United States over sex between priests and
>youths, in which the Catholic Church has paid out millions of dollars in an
>effort to resolve them.
>
>If, as has happened frequently in these scandals, (1) the boy came back
>regularly over a period of years in order to have sex with the priest, and
>(2) the "victim" waited twenty to thirty years before denouncing the priest,
>one is entitled to wonder whether his motive was not financial above all;
>and if there is a sense of guilt, it results mainly from the medieval and
>hypocritical attitude of the church, and not automatically, nor necessarily,
>from the sexual relationship itself.
>
Does the left really want to argue that children, who trust adults to care
for and protect them, as they must in order to survive, should be treated as
sexual objects by those in positions of authority, such as priests? This
amounts to crass indifference toward children and teens, hardly a liberatory
position. In arguing that "Pederasty is inseparable from the high points of
Western culture--ancient Greece and the Renaissance," Thorstad would have
socialists model our sexual outlook on that of slave societies.

Socialists can oppose state-sponsored sex panics and capitalism's
schizophrenic desexualization alongside hypersexualization of youth without
advocating grown men's "right" to fuck children.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Material on this Web site is licensed by SocialistWorker.org, under a
Creative Commons (by-nc-nd 3.0) [4] license, except for articles that are
republished with permission. Readers are welcome to share and use material
belonging to this site for non-commercial purposes, as long as they are
attributed to the author and SocialistWorker.org.


[1] http://www.haymarketbooks.org/pb/Sexuality-and-Socialism
[2] http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2010/thorstad220210.html
[3] http://socialistworker.org/2010/01/29/standing-aside-or-speaking-up
[4] http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0




-- 


You cannot build anything on the foundations of caste. You cannot
build up a nation, you cannot build up a morality. Anything that you
will build on the foundations of caste will crack and will never be a
whole.
-AMBEDKAR



http://venukm.blogspot.com

http://www.shelfari.com/kmvenuannur

http://kmvenuannur.livejournal.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB.

Reply via email to