I wanted to share this story with you: http://digg.com/d31MgOF?e
---
"Izzy Award Winner Jeremy Scahill: "We're At a Ground Zero Mo"
The winner of the second annual Izzy Award, named after muckraking
journalist I.F. Stone, discusses independent media and this critical moment
in journalism.
+1 person dugg this story.












*JS:* "..On the flip side of that, it's the role of independent journalists
to embed themselves with the victims of U.S. foreign policy -- in the case
of U.S. journalists -- or domestic policy. What I mean by that is to
actually go out to where the people live who are most affected by these
policies -- be it Afghanistan or the slums of the United States. You have to
be un-embedded from the powerful and you have to embed yourself with the
disempowered, because I think part of our role as independent journalists is
not only to confront those in power, but to give voice to the voiceless.

* BD: You've reported from all over the world. Talk about the relationships
you've observed between the powerful and the powerless.*

*JS:* You have this nexus of the iron fist of U.S. militarism that is
backing up the so-called "hidden hand" of the free market. And so what we
see is that the United States will economically target countries, then have
that targeting of them with economic neo-liberalism backed up by brute
military force -- by supporting military dictatorships, by interfering in
elections.

One strain that has tied together the people that live on the other side of
the barrel of the gun that is U.S. foreign and economic policy is that they
always, out of the rubble, seem to emerge in some form of resistance. We've
seen that in Iraq, and we're seeing it in Afghanistan. We've certainly seen
it throughout Latin America.

Another thing that's important for people to remember: If we fail to stop
the United States from targeting communities across the globe, we don't
choose the kind of resistance that people offer up to wars that we should
have stopped.

We in this country have an obligation to hold our leaders responsible,
because if we don't, then in one way or another, we're responsible for the
consequences -- either in terms of attacks on civilians there, or in
opposition that rises up violently to the policies we had a moral obligation
to try to confront and expose."

"..I remember how proud I was when I saw the *New York Times* forced to
credit Marcy Wheeler, who was an online blogger, for picking up details on
the Bush administration's torture program. They had to credit Marcy Wheeler,
and put a quote from her, and cite her in their newspaper. That to me was a
great moment in the recent history of independent media, because what it did
was shame the corporate media. It said that a blogger with very little
resources can out-scoop the *New York Times* on a very important story that
was catching headlines at that time.

Part of what we're doing is trying to fill the void that is left from
corporate media. We either shame them, or force them to cover it, because we
make it a major issue.."

"..We live in a very exciting time in independent media. Corporate
journalists are less powerful now than they were 10 years ago, but their
owners are much more powerful. Still, the journalists themselves -- they're
no longer these sort of regal kings on a hill. Peggy Noonan represents a
dying generation of people that pontificate from a golden palace somewhere,
hoping the poor will never get through her gates.

The poor are now journalists around the world. The question is: how do we
fund it? How do we keep it viable? How do we keep it credible? And that is
our challenge right now..".

--

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB.

Reply via email to