---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ghulam Muhammed <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 12:13 PM
Subject: [humanrights-movement:2659] Was British Colonial management more
accommodative and less cruel than the US invasions for world’s resources? -
By Ghulam Muhammed


*Saturday, June 19, 2010*

* *

*Was British Colonial management more accommodative and less cruel than the
US invasions for world’s resources?***

* *

*In as much as US forays into Middle East and West Asia, is directly related
to American Jewish Neo-con’s theorizing about the New American Century and
how US can use its newly find uni-polar super power and its immense armed
resources to corner world’s resources, just to sustain its own extravagant
and credit ridden economy, there are signs that its neo-colonialism has
transformed into a monstrous vehicle of Zionist subjugation of the world
that has entirely different dimensions than the 18th century colonialism of
say the British kind. A comparative study would bring out the most grotesque
nature of hijacking of a great nation with high ideals of freedom, human
rights and justice as its founding principals by unscrupulous Zionist
operators, deeply embedded in the US polity and now even in UK and Europe.
It is not a coincidence that the Prime Minister of UK and the President of
France are both Jewish and have an abiding commitment to promote the New
Zionist World Order, with as much relentless cruelty and inhuman
blood-shedding, that the European history is already lagging behind in
comparison as far as bloodshed in wars are concerned.*

* *

*The New York Times’ ‘startling’ disclosure of Afghanistan’s immense
resources are nothing but the captive media’s contribution to the neo-con
driven agenda’s need to calm the detractors at home in the US, who want
American troops to pull out.  The neo-con Jewish planners have projected the
bogey of ‘clash of civilization’ and 9/11, just to find a convenient excuse
to hoodwink American people who may not be as greedy as the gnomes of Wall
Street, to send out American boys to fight un-winnable wars in distant land
which cannot be sustained except through imposing a long term colonial rule
on foreign lands. While the American soldiers are dying in the war fronts of
Iraq and Iran, the money grabbers at home, were busy milking the US economy
of as much moolah, as the system can carry and/or till it collapsed and they
will reap further fortunes for reestablishing the tottering financial
markets. The same robbers will become whitewashed as saviors.*

* *

*Even if there are no moral standards applied to the inhumanity of colonial
system of world governance, it would appear that the British colonialism was
least in a hurry of loot and scoot than the US would appear to be. A fine
example is how British have managed Persian/Arabian Gulf emirates by
judiciously overcoming their initial distrust and apprehension and quietly
transforming the whole region into an area of prosperity and peace. British
were able to ensure security in the Gulf with a small but efficient presence
in just a small emirate of Bahrain. One night’s journey for a small
contingent from the British fleet from Bahrain to Kuwait and Iraq’s Abdul
Kareem Qasim pulled back his blanket over his head and went to sleep.
British san British Jewry were most efficient and unobtrusive in bringing
regime changes in the Gulf. The favourite method was to send the ruler out
for medical tests while a new ruler took over in blood less palace coup. In
contrast, US cannot manage the ‘security’ without having thousands of forces
in all locations from Saudia, Kuwait, Bahrain and Qatar that create the
sense of most oppressive imperialist control over the area in a post
colonial era. A regime change by the US in Saudia was engineered through an
assassin.*

* *

*Obama has worked on the systems with a longer term reforms in mind. He
should come out with new institutions that will demote armed forces and make
them subservient to diplomatic initiatives around the world. Hillary does
not have to warn nations against ‘consequences’ in public. Let all
understand and observe the rules of the game. May be the age of media and
communication will find clients other than the unscrupulous politicians and
warmongers of the world. And people will live in peace, real or imagined.*

* *

Ghulam Muhammed, Mumbai

[email protected]

www.GhulamMuhammed.Blogspot.com

* *

* *

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"humanrights movement" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]<humanrights-movement%[email protected]>
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement?hl=en.



-- 


You cannot build anything on the foundations of caste. You cannot build up a
nation, you cannot build up a morality. Anything that you will build on the
foundations of caste will crack and will never be a whole.
-AMBEDKAR



http://venukm.blogspot.com

http://www.shelfari.com/kmvenuannur

http://kmvenuannur.livejournal.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB.

Reply via email to