Quote UPA has apparently instructed Supreme Court to shelve the SIT report ... Unquote
Wow!!! Is it a fit case for contempt of court? Contempt of the Supreme Court at that? Would someone take it up? That the SIT itself has become intensely controversial and its members now being interrogated for various omissions and commissions is a different matter altogether. Sukla On 29 July 2010 21:31, S kumar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > SIT headed by Raghavan had submitted a Preliminary report and later the > Final > Report. The report apparently indicts Teesta Setalvad for the blatant > fabrications of cases of rape and muders which never happened, revealed by > individual questioning by SIT, strongly objected to by Teesta Setalvad. She > > would face a strong case of perjury for submitting false and unsigned > affidavits > full of fabricated assertions. > > Secondly in case of Zakira's affidavits, again prepared by Teesta and > signed > blindly by the widow of Ehasan Jaffri, her signed affidavit states "My > husband > was pulled out of the house by the mod, killed by sword and his stomacjh > opened > and burning ras inserted IN MY PRESENCE!!" > > In a later media meet, she said "My husband asked me to go upstairs and > lock > myself in the room as the mob has collected outside and was restive. I > heard the > shouts, screams of my husband and later found my husband killed in the mob > attack" > > AND THE FACT IS THAT SHE WAS IN THE U.S. WITH HER DAUGHTER DURING THE RIOTS > AND > REACHED INDIA ONLY AFTER A WEEK. > > She too might fac a case of perjury for filing false affidavits as the > Passports > and immigration records will reveal her having been out of India contrary > to her > affidavit of her personal presence at the riots scene. > > Inview of these, the UPA has apparently instructed Supreme Court to shelve > the > SIT report, and SIT officers could not be manipulated as CBI by Congress!! > > ________________________________ > From: vasant sardesai > <[email protected]<vasant_sardesai%40rediffmail.com> > > > To: [email protected] <media_monitor5%40yahoogroups.com> > Cc: [email protected] <v.ashtekar%40tatamotors.com> > Sent: Thu, July 29, 2010 1:06:02 PM > Subject: Re: RE: [media_monitor5] Sohrabuddin case: CBI In Sabarmati Jail > to > question Shah > > > Now only the goondas, and criminals and dons will get police protection > along > with the politicians. By the way what happened to the SIT final report? > What > action is taken on it? Or is it to be filed? It appears that proper care > was not > taken while choosing its personnel. Henceforth it appears that such > committees > will be formed only from the personnels from CBI to avoid such > inconveniences. > > V. S. Sardesai > > On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:30:55 +0530 Aditya Rathi wrote > > > > Whole Country is only worryingfor the Encounter of one well known Criminal. > > > > This willdemoralize the Police force and encourage Criminals to act > BINDHAS. > > > ShameShame Shame....... ......CriminalPo litics of Ghandian Party. > > > > > > To: media_monitor5@ yahoogroups. com; v.ashte...@tatamoto rs.com > >From: ashtekargopal@ yahoo.com > >Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 05:46:05 -0700 > >Subject: [media_monitor5] Sohrabuddin case: CBI In Sabarmati Jail to > question > >Shah > > > > > > Title: Sohrabuddin case: CBI In Sabarmati Jail to question Shah > > > Author: PTI > Publication: The Times of India > Date: July 28, 2010. > > http://timesofindia .indiatimes. com/india/ Sohrabuddin- case-CBI- > in-Sabarmati- > jail-to-question -Shah/articlesho w/6227023. cms > > Sohrabuddin case: CBI in Sabarmati jail to question Shah > PTI, Jul 28, 2010, 12.28pm IST > AHMEDABAD: CBI officials on Wednesday questioned former Gujarat minister > Amit > Shah, arrested in the Sohrabuddin Sheikh fake encounter case, in the > Sabarmati > jail here following a court order. > > > > >The court on a CBI application had given permission to the investigating > agency > >to question Shah inside the jail from July 28 to 30. > > > > > >CBI officer Amitabh Thakur and other officials along with their lawyer are > part > >of the team constituted to quiz the former Minister of State for Home, who > > >resigned from the Narendra Modi government on Saturday. > > > > > >On a request from Shah, the court had ordered audio-video recording of > >interrogation by CBI. The agency has also taken videographers with them > inside > >the Sabarmati jail. > > > > > >Shah is lodged in Tilak barrack of the jail after he was arrested by the > CBI in > >the fake encounter case of Sohrabuddin Sheikh and killing of his wife > Kausarbi > >in 2005 on Sunday. > > > > > >As per the chargesheet filed by the CBI in the court, Shah is accused of > murder, > >kidnapping and extortion along with other charges like destruction of > evidence > >and criminal conspiracy. > > > > > >According to the chargesheet, Shah had allegedly entrusted the job of > >eliminating Sheikh to three senior IPS officers. > > > > > >"Elimination of Sohrabuddin was being used for extortion by the accused > persons > >to establish an element of fear in the minds of the businessmen and > others," it > >said. > > > > > >The accused persons from Rajasthan Police allegedly participated in the > >conspiracy because Sohrabuddin was terrorising the marble lobby in the > >neighbouring state, the CBI has said. > > > > > >Shah allegedly entrusted the job to IPS officers D G Vanzara, Rajkumar > Pandiyan > >and Abhay Chudasama, former DCP of Ahmedabad city Crime Branch. The BJP > leader > >was in constant touch over telephone with Vanzara when Sohrabuddin and his > wife > >were in the custody of Gujarat Police, CBI claimed. > > > > > >It said a probe into the role of former Gujarat police officer N K Amin, > one of > >the accused who has turned approver, revealed that he was in constant > touch with > >Shah, on phone. > > > > > >"He (Amin) made/received as many as 25 calls from/to Shah between November > 21, > >2005 and November 30, 2005," it said. > > > > > >The CBI probe further alleged that in early November 2005, one Tulsiram > >Prajapati was contacted by accused Abhay Chudasama (former DCP of > Ahmedabad city > >Crime Branch) and produced before Vanzara who asked him to make > Sohrabuddin > >available before him as there was "a lot of political pressure". > > > > > >Prajapati, killed in a police "encounter" in December 2006, was assured > that > >(his friend) Sohrabuddin would get a safe passage and at the most would be > put > >in jail for 3-4 months. No physical harm would be done to Sohrabuddin, it > said. > > > > > >"Having got the assurance from Vanzara, Prajapati helped Chudasama in > tracking > >Sohrabuddin, " it alleged. > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > __ > __,_._,___ > -- Peace Is Doable -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB.
