This an outright expression of a fascist mindset. On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Sukla Sen <[email protected]> wrote:
> [Just mark the intemperate language. > It almost makes out a case that critiquing the judgement, which has been > near universally found as grossly unfair or still worse both in this country > and abroad with critics including people like Amartya Sen and even > overwhelming sections of mainstream media, is in itself an anti-national act > - an act of sedition!] > > > http://www.organiser.org/dynamic/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=379&page=5 > > > <http://www.organiser.org/dynamic/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=379&page=5> > > *Editorial > > Are Maoists Super Citizens?* > > WHEN the Maoists kill hundreds of innocent villagers-men, women and > children-we don’t hear howls of protest from the self styled civil liberty > activists. When the victims of Maoist terror, women who were kept captive > and beastily gang raped by Maoist thugs escape somehow and narrate their > agonizing tale to the civil society we don’t hear the outraged cry of > violated human dignity. When the Maoists in their barbaric display of > insanity murder and mime three month old and four year old toddlers in cold > blood we don’t hear the professional jholawallahs staging their theatrical > dismay over the mindless violence of the so-called red revolutionaries’ > misplaced sense of intimidation. We are often confounded by their deafening > silence, stonewalling rationalisation of accidental mistake. > > Their version of war against the state is blowing up schools, hospitals, > buses ferrying vanvasis from remote interiors of Dantaewada with their > forest produce to nearby market place to sell them and in return buy rice, > salt and other minimal provisions of daily life. The Maoists routinely blow > up and mercilessly cause death of the state police and CRPF jawans with > landmines and bombs. The overground friends of these sadist brigands don’t > tell their underground outlaws that the state has a duty to protect the > lives and property of its citizens. Rather they try to justify these mind > boggling cruelty as part of the vanvasi revolt against the oppressive state. > They stop every development effort of the state but they hold out Maoist > mayhem as the protest of the tribals against decades of urban neglect and > government apathy. They brazenly use the Vanvasi as cannon fodder to advance > their version of red anarchy. > > That is why the bizarre exhibition of outrage, anger and anguish over the > verdict of the lower court sentencing Binayak Sen and two others to life > term for sedition, criminal conspiracy and collaboration with Maoists sounds > bogus if not spurious. What is it that these men and women are protesting? > Do they want us to believe that Binayak Sen, because he is Binayak Sen is > above the law of the land? That no court, no police, no authority has a > right to prosecute him however dubious his actions are or however criminally > involved he is with the Maoist merchants of death? We are not discussing > here the merit of the cases against Sen. It is for the court to decide. > > The Maoists do not make a secret of their political line. They openly > propagate sedition. They call the state a sham. They have no faith in the > democratically constituted governments, they do not believe or participate > in elections. They denounce the Indian Constitution. They declare - their > literature is explicit - that they are waging a war against the state. The > definition of the sedition law is this: If you wage a war against the sate, > if you preach violence against the state, if you work towards overthrowing > the constitutionally elected governments you are liable to be punished under > sedition act. The Chhattisgarh government has enacted a special > act-Chhattisgarh Special Public Safety Act-in the face of growing Maoist > violence to protect citizens and tackle the menace. > > Binayak Sen was first arrested on suspicion of aiding and abetting the > Maoist activities. Then also there was a huge outburst of international > condemnation and later he was released on bail on a court order on health > grounds. His plea had been rejected twice earlier. Now his supporters are > claiming that the charges against him are weak and that he does not deserve > the life term awarded to him. He was tried under the law of the land. The > trial went on for two years. It was a free and fair trial. He received the > best possible legal aid. There is no dearth of resources or support for Sen > to fight his case. This is a free society. And the trial was a legal process > unlike what happens in the so-called kangaroo-"people’s court"-of the > Maoists where without trial or legal aid innocent people are convicted to > death and other inhuman punishments for defying the Maoist diktat. > > Sen has a right to appeal in the High Court and then Supreme Court. He can > get bail. His friends are openly questioning the judge and the judiciary, > accusing the judge of bias and political predilections. This is outrageous. > The Maoists are demanding special privileges which no other citizen in the > country enjoys. They want to be above the law, that they don’t have any > faith in the rule of law is another matter. They are talking of human rights > which in their totalitarian concept they totally deny to others. > > These people have a common identity. These are the same people who claim to > occupy the middle ground, they claim to mediate for widening the space for > dissent, they defend every terrorist, secessionist, separatist, and their > common objective to shrink the Hindu majority space. Whenever one of them or > those whom they claim to represent is hauled up under the law they make a > boisterous hue and cry. They want to hold the state a hostage to their > unreasonable demands. They have a loyal band in the media to echo their > idea, playing up to the whims of anarchists, anti-nationals and separatists. > They hog limelight, special mention and awards in the fashionable > international circuit. Their mandate is to weaken the state, create > disaffection in the pillars of democracy and try and make India a banana > republic. See the manner in which the National Advisory Council(NAC), Sonia > Gandhi’s handpicked men and women in the UPA government has reacted to the > Raipur court verdict. Are they trying to intimidate and undermine the > judiciary in the country? Or tell the world that the Indian legal system is > not free and fair? > > > -- > Peace Is Doable > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Green Youth Movement" group. > To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<greenyouth%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB. > -- W A Laskar Freelance Reporter and Human Rights Defender with Barak Human Rights Protection Committee <http://bhrpc.wordpress.com/>, http://bhrpc.wordpress.com 15, Panjabari Road, Darandha, Six Mile, Guwahati-781037, Assam, India Cell: +919401134314 Visit my blog <http://www.rightspeaks.blogspot.com> at www.rightspeaks.blogspot.com Skype: rights.defender -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB.
