http://kafila.org/2011/04/28/cultures-of-corruption-kalpana-kannabiran/

<http://kafila.org/2011/04/28/cultures-of-corruption-kalpana-kannabiran/>Cultures
of Corruption: Kalpana Kannabiran
APRIL 28, 2011

We are a country given to idolatry – both the erection and demolition of
idols a favourite pastime that buries under the rubble questions of ethics
and constitutional morality.   While this penchant for idolatry raises
larger questions,  I will concern myself at this point with the effigy (or
the idol upside down) called corruption.

While there has undoubtedly been a marked shift in the languages of
corruption in the neo liberal era, calling for new and different strategies
to combat it, the fight against corruption is not new.  When women’s groups
campaigned decades ago against the testing of banned drugs and
contraceptives on poor people by the ICMR, the question that was raised was
about the nexus between pharmaceutical companies and state actors that
involved deals for which poor and vulnerable communities were pushed to the
guillotine.  With Bhopal, the question came up again on the deals between
multinational companies (Union Carbide in this case) and the government that
violated every principle of human rights, natural justice, constitutional
morality and the ethics of care in governance.  Was the derailment of
justice effected without corruption at every level? Apart from providing
care to the affected, was not the struggle for justice in Bhopal a struggle
against corruption?  When the People’s War Group (as it was then called)
abducted an elected representative two decades ago (who was later released),
the reason they gave to the negotiators was that he misused public funds in
the district and asserted that theirs was a fight against corrupt
representatives.

A visually challenged dalit woman president of a self help group publicly
testified in the tribunal on the World Bank held at JNU a few years ago, on
the normalization of corrupt practices in the disbursement of funds, and on
the use of the power of caste and gender to beat down opposition from people
like her.  Faculty and students of a prestigious public university resisted
and stalled the allocation of university land to a corporate medical
facility, a case in which informed media reports exposed major
irregularities in the agreement (a euphemism for corruption).  Civil
liberties groups for decades have been fighting corruption in criminal
justice and investigation (in which the forensic medical fraternity is
complicit) on a case-by-case basis.  It was the collective struggle of large
numbers of people of the working class in Rajasthan, whose livelihood
depended on daily wages that was responsible for the passage of the right to
information act.  The fight for justice to the survivors of Gujarat 2002 has
still not ended because the resistance to the corruption of the state
machinery is far from easy in operational terms.  And yet, struggles there
have been – memorable and tenacious ones that have spanned the little hamlet
and the national stage.  And the struggle against corruption has had heroes
who have paid with their lives and others who have lost their livelihoods
for resisting it.

In the sudden snowballing of the movement led by Anna Hazare, there has been
a reduction of corruption to its effigy out there that can be burnt or
disfigured.  But yet, when we think more carefully, it strikes us that
corruption is in fact a question of culture, of a way of life and ways of
negotiating with the daily business of living; it is about a way of thinking
about ourselves, our kin, and the spaces we build – familial, community and
institutional besides the public space of government; thinking about
corruption is about setting out the non-negotiables that will govern us as
much as it will govern others; and most importantly, in the context of the
Jan Lokpal Bill, it is about preserving the fundamental principles of human
rights even at the most heady, euphoric moments of resistance.

When the builder “regularizes” a manifestly irregular construction; or
another slaps a public servant on duty and gets away with it; when aspiring
industrialists of Indian origin want to “fast-track” their aspirations by
having all stops removed; when doctors in the towns and metropoles cosy up
to the much vilified RMPs (registered medical practitioners) in the
peri-urban and rural areas; when lawyers in courts of original jurisdiction
or those seeking senior engagements cultivate the habit of approaching some
senior colleagues and not others with an eye on kickbacks in fees; when
members of the respectable elite feel a tinge of regret (embarrassment even)
in unequivocally castigating an IT giant who landed in jail for criminal
corruption;  when we encounter the cash-for-mobility policy that governs the
movement of files in a government office; when we witness the brotherhood of
health care blooming and growing through mutual payoffs between different
care providers, the burden of which must be borne by unsuspecting care
seekers, we are witnessing and negotiating with the culture of corruption
that is not as far removed from us as an effigy.

When we believe that we must remove customary stops and we can ignore simple
caveats to bring scarce jobs, projects, positions and seats to people we
love or those we owe a “return gift” to – because after all love translates
into the removal of hardship; when defeat translates into victory with a
single whir of the money machine; or when we make our peace with “chai-pani”
so that we can get on with our work rather than waiting endlessly, we are
after all participating in the culture of corruption and fortifying it from
within.

These are difficult and arduous struggles, often life-threatening, but when
the going gets really tough, Bollywood shows us the way:  Anil Kapoor, who
in a single day as chief minister sets right all of Bombay’s ills, or the
even more celebrated Sanjay Dutt, who teaches us that Gandhigiri is the best
way to tackle corruption.  It was puzzling initially, to see references to
Annasaheb Hazare as the new age Gandhi.  But suddenly it all falls into
place.  The recall is “Munnabhai” who immediately catalyses “gandhigiri”
signaled by the anna-topi and the jan lokpal bill.  Annasaheb and his
illustrious work in the villages in Maharashtra fades from view.  The
constitution with its caveats and the rule of law have no place here.
Cameras roll overtime, anchors squabble for bytes and scream, taking the
hysteria to a crescendo.   Film stars, cult leaders, the ordinarily sedate
upwardly mobile, urban middle class across ages, and aspirants to the
national political stage all occupy the screen, while mobile phone providers
make a killing with chain sms-es flying back and forth.  Standing uneasily
with this motley group are public figures known for their commitment and
their work, who have inexplicably capitulated to the headiness of the
moment.  The tide ebbs, the advantage of the moment is surrendered to
“consensually” decided representatives, and the issue of corruption has been
“tackled” by the vibrant and watchful citizenry.

But the fact is that the going is tough.  The struggle against corruption at
any level is the toughest of struggles. There are questions of culture and
ethics, but also importantly questions of the rule of law.  So we are back
to the question we started with.  But there is also an ethical question that
must be addressed in this case.  Does every “representative” in this group
come to the drafting table with clean, unsullied hands?  Has every member of
the group entrusted with the onerous task of putting in place a roadmap for
constitutional morality and ethics in public and private life resisted the
culture of corruption beyond dispute?  Or have we yet again surrendered the
moment to idolatry that guarantees immunity to the idol?

*Kalpana Kannabiran is Director, Council for Social Development, Hyderabad*

-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB.

Reply via email to