[Quote

The EPR plant under construction at Flamanville (northern France) has seen
interminable delays and a massive cost hike. Two persons have died on the
construction site and the plant is not expected to go on stream before 2016
at the very least. EDF, the most experienced constructor in the world, has
admitted it has not mastered the engineering techniques demanded by the
hugely complex and complicated design of the massive 1,650 MWe pressurised
water reactor. There is not a single EPR plant operating to date and the
Olkiluoto plant in Finland too has seen massive cost overruns and long
delays, with the result that the Finns and Areva are locked in a protracted
legal battle.

In December 2010 Areva signed a framework agreement with India to build the
first of six EPR reactors at Jaitapur in Maharashtra with an option of four
more reactors to follow. But Areva will build only the nuclear island while
the turbine island and other installations will have to be built by
contractors chosen by the NPCIL. Fears have been expressed that with EDF,
the most experienced builder and operator of nuclear reactors in the world
unable to get it right in Flamanville, the Indian side may not be able to
ensure proper construction and safety. There is also some uncertainty about
the central dome of the EPR which is forged by the Japanese. Japan, with its
aggressive anti-nuclear stand (especially on proliferation issues) may not
agree to the technology transfer to India.
Unquote]

http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2468399.ece

PARIS, September 20, 2011

India to postpone decision on buying EPR reactors from FranceVAIJU NARAVANE

 India will postpone its final decision on the purchase of EPR type nuclear
reactors from France until after the current post-Fukushima nuclear safety
tests have been satisfactorily completed, it is reliably learnt.

Srikumar Banerjee, Chairman of India's Atomic Energy Commission, conveyed
this message to French Industry Minister Eric Besson when the two met during
the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) consultations which opened in
Vienna. Mr. Besson said: “Dr. Banerjee said India imports only reactors
which have been certified by their own authorities. The EPR has already been
certified. Now they want the post-Fukushima certification.” However, he
added that the Indians had conveyed this message “in a very positive
manner.”

Several nuclear contracts around the world have been either frozen, delayed
or cancelled as a result of the March 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster, the
worst nuclear accident to hit the planet after the Chernobyl explosion of
1986, putting into doubt the much-vaunted “nuclear renaissance.” Germany has
chosen to forgo the nuclear option altogether and in France there is talk of
reducing the country's dependence on nuclear energy to 50 per cent from the
current 75 per cent, by 2025.

The EPR plant under construction at Flamanville (northern France) has seen
interminable delays and a massive cost hike. Two persons have died on the
construction site and the plant is not expected to go on stream before 2016
at the very least. EDF, the most experienced constructor in the world, has
admitted it has not mastered the engineering techniques demanded by the
hugely complex and complicated design of the massive 1,650 MWe pressurised
water reactor. There is not a single EPR plant operating to date and the
Olkiluoto plant in Finland too has seen massive cost overruns and long
delays, with the result that the Finns and Areva are locked in a protracted
legal battle.

In December 2010 Areva signed a framework agreement with India to build the
first of six EPR reactors at Jaitapur in Maharashtra with an option of four
more reactors to follow. But Areva will build only the nuclear island while
the turbine island and other installations will have to be built by
contractors chosen by the NPCIL. Fears have been expressed that with EDF,
the most experienced builder and operator of nuclear reactors in the world
unable to get it right in Flamanville, the Indian side may not be able to
ensure proper construction and safety. There is also some uncertainty about
the central dome of the EPR which is forged by the Japanese. Japan, with its
aggressive anti-nuclear stand (especially on proliferation issues) may not
agree to the technology transfer to India.

On September 15, France's major nuclear operators including Areva and
electricity giant EDF handed in their self-evaluation reports on 80
installations to the nuclear safety agency, the ASN. This body, along with
the IRSN (Institute of Radio-protection and Nuclear Safety) will now examine
the self-evaluations submitted by the three nuclear players in France and
hand in its report by the end of 2011.

Already nuclear watchdog agencies such as Sortir du Nuclear (Quitting
Nuclear), the Nuclear Observatory and several ecologist groups have
criticised the method of self-evaluation adopted by the ASN and the French
government.

“No credibility can be accorded to this type of self-evaluation by
commercial enterprises. They have no desire whatsoever to see their
operations halted for further verification,” said Stephane Lhomme, of the
NGO Nuclear Observatory. “The only way to really verify all the safety
factors and mechanisms is by halting the installations. This is not to speak
of the totally unresolved questions of nuclear waste or the decommissioning
of old reactors.”

“These tests are all fluff,” said nuclear scientist Jean-Marie Brom, who
works at the Centre for Scientific Research in Strasbourg and is a member of
Sortir du Nucleaire. “We are not in any way better prepared to prevent
nuclear accidents. Had Tepco been asked to do a safety report on Fukushima a
year ago, the company would have said it was perfectly safe.”

A recent blast at France's oldest nuclear site in Marcule which killed one
person and injured four has reignited the debate on nuclear safety in
France.


-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB.

Reply via email to