Press Note

Villagers Unanimously Reject Power Plant Based on Waste Burning

Jalandhar Cantt MLA Opposes Dioxins and Mercury Emitting Factory in
Jamsher Village

Jalandhar, 30/9/2011: At a public hearing for obtaining environmental
clearance for setting up of a Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) processing
facility in Jamsher village by Municipal Corporation Jalandhar, it
emerged that there was unanimous opposition to the project which
involved waste burning for generation of electricity. The villagers
feared threat to human health and environment from the toxic waste to
electricity plant. The villagers from all the adjoining villages who
are likely to be adversely affected expressed their bitter opposition
to the proposed poisonous power plant.

The Department of Local Government, Government of Punjab has initiated
to implement an “integrated MSW management facility for Jalandhar
cluster comprising of Jalandhar city and 25 other Urban Local Bodies
(ULBs).” This means that wastes from ULBs like Jalandhar, Adampur,
Alawalpur, Banga, Begowal, Bhogpur, Bhulath, Dasuya, Dhilwan,
Garshankar, Goraya, Hariana, Hoshiarpur, Kapurthala, Kartarpur, Lohian
Khas, Mahalpur, Nakodar, Nawan Shehar, Nurmahal, Phagwara, Shahkot,
Sham Chaurasi, Sri Hargobindpur, Sultanpur and Umar Tanda will be
transferred to the plant site in Jamsher village.  The villagers made
it clear that come what may they will not allow the cancer causing
plant in their region.

It was noted that in the Draft Environment Impact Assessment report
prepared by SENES Consultants India Pvt Ltd on behalf of Municipal
Corporation Jalandhar, Punjab and  Infrastructure Leasing & Financial
Services Limited (IL&FS)’s Infrastructure Development Corporation that
the ‘Municipal Solid Waste Processing Facility’, will use incineration
of Refuse Derived Fuel (RDF) technology. This is a biomass burning
technology.

The testimonies observed that Supreme Court’s order dated 16.05.2007
in the Writ Petition (Civil) 888 of 1996 case is being violated. The
Court orders had recommended only biomethenation technology. Unmindful
of this, the Draft EIA states that “A power plant of 6MW capacity will
be installed as part of the MSW processing plant. The boiler of the
power plant will designed to be fired with RDF, biogas and CNG…” It
also reveals that it is actually a furnace for burning waste.

As per 136 page Draft Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) report, “
The facility will comprise of a MSW processing facility at Jamsher
village in Jalandhar district for processing the MSW from Jalandhar
cluster and an engineered Sanitary Land Fill (SLF) site at Hoshiarpur
town in Hoshiarpur district for disposal of processing rejects and
other inert wastes generated by the processing facility.” Although it
is quite clear that it is an EIA for electricity generation, the
public hearing did not reveal it explicitly.

At the public hearing Punjab Pollution Control Board conceded that it
does not have the capacity to even test persistent organic pollutants
like dioxins. The project developer could not explain how they will
segregate heavy metals like lead and mercury from the mixed waste
which is to be burnt as per the EIA report.

Jagbir Singh Brar, MLA, Jalandhar cantt, Punjab observed that “the
public hearing for “Municipal solid waste processing facility” is
quite strange. This is actually a waste burning project. It is a power
project based on waste. The question is why has Punjab Pollution
Control Board and the project developer hidden this fact from the
public. I have learnt from newspapers and research reports that such
plants have failed in India, why a failed project is being proposed
here. A similar plant has failed in Timarpur in Delhi and in Andhra
Pradesh. Delhi High Court had scolded the Govt. for such experimental
technology in the past.”

He added, “Project Developer and Punjab Pollution Control Board are
trying to confuse the public by not revealing that waste burning is
highly polluting. It has not told the public about the health effects
and diseases caused by waste burning plants. No health and
environmental loving person can allow such polluting and disease
causing plant in there place of residence. I am deeply concerned about
the health of the villagers from the locality and its impact on the
dairy. I on my own behalf and on behalf of the people of Jalandhar
urge you to ensure that this Dioxins emitting technology of waste
burning in the residential area is not allowed. This plant should not
get environmental clearance in view of its adverse impact on public
health and environment.”  Brar was elected MLA in the last State
Assembly election but resigned.

ToxicsWatch Alliance (TWA) which was also present at the public
hearing noted that while the project has two components comprising of
“municipal solid waste processing facility” and an engineered Sanitary
Land Fill, this EIA report only dealt with the former. The project has
deliberately been broken into two parts to obviate combined resistance
from the villagers of Jamsher and Hoshiarpur. This EIA report is
misleading both the residents of Jamsher, Hoshiarpur the Jalandhar.
The report states that the total area available for development of the
“MSW facility is approximately 25 acres”. Why does it exclude
Hoshiarpur’s 30 acre? As per the TOR given in the Draft EIA report for
the MSW facility, some 20 points out of the 35 points mentioned refer
to landfill but this document is silent about it.

It is claimed in the Draft EIA report that the MSW processing plant to
consist of burning of RDF (Refuse Derived Fuel) plant, biomethanation
plant, power plant (optional) and composting facility. The plant will
be designed to process 700 Tonnes Per Day (TPD) of Municipal Solid
Waste and is expected to generate around 260 TPD of Refuse Derived
Fuel (RDF) in the form of fluff. The fluff is expected to have a Gross
Calorific Value (GCV) of 2,500 Kcal/kg to 27,000 Kcal/kg. The plant
will also be designed to process 50 TPD of green waste for producing
biogas in a biomethanation plant and manure in a composting facility.
The biogas generated is expected to be about 2,750 to 3,000 Nm3/day
and manure quantity is expected to be about 6-7 TPD. The RDF plant and
the biomethanation plant are expected to operate for 330 days in a
year. The total cost of the integrated MSW processing facility is
estimated to INR 99.21 crores. The project will be made operational in
a span of 14 months, it is claimed.
It is confessed in the EIA report that waste collected from various
sources in the Jalandhar cluster will have differing calorific values.
It is not revealed how Indian waste, which has calorific value of
800-1000 kcal will gain the Gross Calorific Value) of 2,600+ kcal / kg
after drying and separation of non-combustible and recyclable fraction
and after conversion to RDF.

TWA observed that If the project is to be implemented by companies
like Jindal Urban Infrastructure Limited (JUIL), a company of M/s
Jindal Saw Group Limited owned by Prithviraj Jindal, which has no
previous experience in waste management, it will distort waste
management beyond repair.

Given the fact that the project proponent is using RDF technology it
is relevant to note that all such experiments based on this technology
to treat waste has failed in the country. A similar plant proposal
compelled the union Environment Minister to write to Delhi chief
minister that there has been violation in basic condition stipulated
in environment condition. It violates the recommendation of the
environment Ministry. In a White paper on Pollution, it has been
underlined that Indian waste is suitable only for Biological Treatment
Methods. It violates the recommendation of Supreme Courts committee on
Waste to Energy that insisted on segregation of waste its source. Once
waste is segregated, compostable waste can be composted and recycled
waste can be recycled. In such a scenario, what is the need to burn
the waste, TWA questioned, in its submission.

The power generated will be highly expensive. Experts suggest that it
is 4-5times costlier than the conventional electricity. The EIA report
does not reveal how the project developer will deal with toxic ash
which will contain heavy metals like mercury. If such ash is dumped in
place like Hoshiarpur, it will adversely affects the health of the
people of Hoshiarpur. In 1990’s, a similar waste Energy Plant was shut
down in Delhi because the garbage had about 60% organic waste and
large amount of silt. The waste of Jalandhar will not be any
different.

Indian waste has some 60 % organic waste and some 25 % sand, dust and ash.
Incineration of such waste is inadvisable. It promotes waste
generation, what is required is waste prevention and reduction and
zero waste system that guarantees returned on investments and healthy
communities. There is threat to ground water from ash disposal.
Incineration also creates huge amount of Air pollution. It also
releases Carbon monoxide, oxides of sulphur and nitrogen, hydrocarbons
and particulates in the air. Waste incineration emits Green House
Gases as well. This technology has high public health cost. It causes
cancers, birth defects in villagers living in the vicinity of
incineration.

 In view of the above, it is clear to the villagers in Jalandhar that
incineration is the most costly waste management option from the point
of view of public health environment and natural resources. Therefore,
the villagers submitted that project the power plant based on waste
should not get environmental clearance. It is also to be noted that
Ministry of new renewable energy is damaging waste management in
cities like Jalandhar by providing subsidy to such polluting projects.
 This Ministry should desist from promoting such hazardous projects.

For Details: GOPAL KRISHNA, CONVENER, TOXICSWATCH ALLIANCE, Mb: 09818089660,
E-mail: [email protected], Web: toxicswatch.blogspot.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB.

Reply via email to