[image: Image removed by
sender.]<http://wearethebest.wordpress.com/author/churumuri/>
****
*Reuters’ Modi interview: “Sensational
tokenism”*<http://wearethebest.wordpress.com/2013/07/13/reuters-modi-interview-sensational-tokenism/>
****

by *churumuri* <http://wearethebest.wordpress.com/author/churumuri/> ****

[image: Image removed by sender.]****

*Reuters*' scoop
*interview*<http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2013/07/12/interview-with-bjp-leader-narendra-modi/>with
*Narendra Modi*
<http://wearethebest.wordpress.com/tag/narendra-modi/>published
yesterday by the news agency, but apparently given
*17 days ago on June
25*<http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130713/jsp/frontpage/story_17112818.jsp#.UeEOYTekPxU>,
has created headlines for the Gujarat chief minister's continuing lack of
contrition for what happened under his watch in 2002.****

And for his *faux pas* of comparing the victims to "*kutte ka
bachcha*<http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2013/07/12/interview-with-bjp-leader-narendra-modi/>"
(puppies).****

On Twitter, *Sruthi Gottipati*, one of the two *Reuters*' journalists who
sat down for the powwow has complained of the manner in which the interview
has played out on Indian TV and in the newspapers.****

[image: Image removed by sender.] <https://twitter.com/GoSruthi>****

But those who have been fighting Modi on the courts of Gujarat and Delhi
have bigger problems with Reuters' interview than the slip of the tongue.
Here, below, is the full text of the press release emailed by the *Business
India* journalist turned activist *Teesta Setalvad *of Citizens* *for
Justice and Peace.****

*******

*PRESS RELEASE**: Seven days before Reuters published its [Narendra Modi]
exclusive, a privilege denied by the PM-aspirant to an Indian news agency
or channel, we [Citizens for Justice and Peace] had been contacted
persistently by a Reuters correspondent.*

*Not Ross Colvin or Sruthi Gottipati <https://twitter.com/GoSruthi> who now
carry the journalistic honour of grabbing moments with a man who rarely
likes to be questioned, especially if the questions are persistent like say
those of Karan Thapar in 2007.*

*Thapar keen to get to the bottom of what Modi actually felt about 2002,
did not  simply casually record – as Reuters has done – Modi’s response but
asked, insistently, whether Modi actually regretted the mass reprisal
killings that had taken place, post-Godhra, on his watch.*

*Modi simpered, dithered, glared and admonished…when none of that worked,
and Thapar persisted, Modi did what he does best.*

*He walked 
out<http://churumuri.wordpress.com/2007/10/21/does-bjp-owe-an-apology-for-gujarat-genocide/>
.*

*Not so with Reuters, that managed its exclusive but failed to,
conspicuously, persist with any accurate, difficult or pinching questions.*

*****

*The young man from Reuters who finally tracked me down in the Sahmat
office at 29 Ferozeshah Road last week was clueless, he said, about Gujarat
2002. Apologetic about this ineptness, he kept saying that his bosses had
asked him to track down the SIT report.*

*They had not bothered to contact us directly.*

*We insisted that he, read Reuters, do what fair journalism demands: look
at the SIT clean chit in context; examine also the amicus curaie Raju
Ramachandran’s report that conflicted seriously with the SIT closure and
clean chit (opining that there was material to prosecute Narendra Modi on
serious charges).*

*Both the SIT and the amicus were appointed by the same Supreme Court.*

*We insisted that Reuters examine the Supreme Court Order of 12.9.2011 that
gave us the inalienable right to file a Protest Petition; we pointed out
that Reuters must read the Protest Petition itself that we filed in
pursuance of this order on 15.4.2013, peruse the arguments that we have
been making before the Magistrate since June 25, 2013.*

*****

*We tried, as best as we could,  to communicate that Reuters should read
the SIT clean chit in the context of these overall developments.*

*No, No, said Reuters that had possibly already bagged the interview by
then.*

*Who says a politically important interview should address all developments
and facts, in a nutshell, tell the whole and complete story?*

*Much better to perform a tokenism, throw in a few questions about 2002,
not persist with questioning the man charged with conspiracy to commit mass
murder and subvert criminal justice with the complexities and gravity of
charges and legal procedures that he currently faces – and which are being
argued in Open Court in Ahmedabad.*

*Easier to be glib, grab headlines in all national dailies including by the
way the one in Telegraph which is the only newspaper to report that Modi
used “kutte ke bacche” not puppy as an analogy for which creatures may
inadvertently get crushed when a “road accident happens.”*

*Never mind that many have been convicted for criminal negligence when they
drive and kill.*

*On business and development, too, while Reuters plugs the man themselves
in the first paragraph of the interview, there are no real probing
questions on foreign direct investment, the Gujarat government’s back out
to solar power companies (reported two days ago in the Economic Times) and
so on....*

*So, quite apart from the more than despicable “kutte ke bacche” comment
that Modi reportedly made, quite apart from the fact that he chose
Reutersfor his debutante mutterings not a national agency or channel,
what is
truly tragic about the whole exercise is the compliant journalism that it
reflects.*

*The Reuters interview is not a dispassionate or thorough exercise that
attempts to genuinely probe opinions and views. It is a sensational
tokenism.*

*Teesta Setalvad**, secretary, Citizens for Justice and Peace*

*churumuri <http://wearethebest.wordpress.com/author/churumuri/>* | 13 July
2013 at 2:12 pm | Tags:
*Churumuri*<http://wearethebest.wordpress.com/?tag=churumuri>,
*Karan Thapar* <http://wearethebest.wordpress.com/?tag=karan-thapar>, *Narendra
Damodardas 
Modi*<http://wearethebest.wordpress.com/?tag=narendra-damodardas-modi>,
*Narendra Modi* <http://wearethebest.wordpress.com/?tag=narendra-modi>, *
Reuters* <http://wearethebest.wordpress.com/?tag=reuters>, *Ross
Colvin*<http://wearethebest.wordpress.com/?tag=ross-colvin>,
*Sans Serif* <http://wearethebest.wordpress.com/?tag=sans-serif>, *Sruthi
Gottipati* <http://wearethebest.wordpress.com/?tag=sruthi-gottipati>, *Teesta
Setalvad* <http://wearethebest.wordpress.com/?tag=teesta-setalvad>, *Twitter
* <http://wearethebest.wordpress.com/?tag=twitter> | Categories: *Issues
and Ideas* <http://wearethebest.wordpress.com/?cat=112502>,
*People*<http://wearethebest.wordpress.com/?cat=660>,
*Television* <http://wearethebest.wordpress.com/?cat=459>, *World Wide
Web*<http://wearethebest.wordpress.com/?cat=2648>| URL:
*http://wp.me/p2iMw-2h5* <http://wp.me/p2iMw-2h5> ****

Comment<http://wearethebest.wordpress.com/2013/07/13/reuters-modi-interview-sensational-tokenism/#respond>
****

   *See all 
comments*<http://wearethebest.wordpress.com/2013/07/13/reuters-modi-interview-sensational-tokenism/#comments>
****

** **

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at *Manage
Subscriptions*<https://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=656d0d2bb88d68af9cfb16f7afe0f630&email=sauravdatta118%40gmail.com>.
****

*Trouble clicking?* Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
*
http://wearethebest.wordpress.com/2013/07/13/reuters-modi-interview-sensational-tokenism/
*<http://wearethebest.wordpress.com/2013/07/13/reuters-modi-interview-sensational-tokenism/>
****

** **

** **

Thanks for flying with [image: Image removed by
sender.]WordPress.com<http://wordpress.com>
****

[image: Image removed by sender.]****


-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


<<image003.jpg>>

<<~WRD000.jpg>>

<<image002.jpg>>

<<image001.jpg>>

Reply via email to