http://www.hindustantimes.com/editorial-views-on/KaranThapar/What-s-left-unsaid/Article1-1099535.aspx

What's left unsaidKaran
Thapar<http://www.hindustantimes.com/Search/search.aspx?q=Karan%20Thapar&op=auth>
July 27, 2013
First Published: 23:06 IST(27/7/2013) | Last Updated: 03:34 IST(28/7/2013)

The recent angry exchanges between the Congress and the BJP hide more than
they reveal. Whilst it’s true politicians often don’t speak the truth and
rarely the full truth, on this occasion what they glossed over is far more
important than what they said. Here’s a peek into what they left
deliberately unsaid.

First, Narendra Modi. He told Reuters he has been given a “thoroughly
clean-chit” by the Supreme Court’s Special Investigation Team (SIT). Alas,
that’s only part of the story.

What Modi didn’t add was that the Supreme Court appointed an amicus curiae,
Raju Ramachandran, to independently assess the SIT’s clean-chit.
Ramachandran concluded that the allegations against Modi need to be heard
in court rather than disposed of by an investigation. Whilst the SIT chose
to disregard Ramachandran’s conclusion, the magistrate’s court in Ahmedabad
accepted a protest petition by Zakia Jafri. It’s being heard on a daily
basis.

Two conclusions follow which Modi didn’t mention. The “thoroughly
clean-chit” is under serious question and the last word has yet to be said.

Second, Modi didn’t reveal what the Supreme Court has said of him. The
argument that this is only obiter dicta does not hold for the most damning
comment comparing him to Nero. That was part of the Zahira Habibullah
Sheikh and Citizens for Justice and Peace vs State of Gujarat and others
judgment pronounced on April 12, 2004. Here are the Supreme Court’s exact
words: “The modern day ‘Neros’ were looking elsewhere when Best Bakery and
innocent children and women were burning, and were probably deliberating
how the perpetrators of the crime can be saved or protected. Law and
Justice become flies in the hands of these ‘wanton boys’. When fences start
to swallow the crops, no scope will be left for survival of law and order
or truth and justice.”

Third, when the BJP repeatedly casts aspersions on the CBI it forgets that
in the Ishrat Jahan case it was appointed by the Gujarat High Court at the
specific request of the state’s advocate general. So when the BJP claims
the CBI is motivated it’s actually criticising the Gujarat High Court’s
supervision.

Now, let’s come to the Congress. It claims to be India’s most truly secular
party. Sadly, its track record reveals embarrassing inconsistencies.

Let’s focus on some from Rajiv Gandhi’s five years as prime minister.
Today, more than his mother or grandfather, he is the party’s icon.
However, the Congress would find it hard to defend what he did.

First, in 1986, within months of its pronouncement, he reversed the Shah
Bano judgment. It was a deliberate attempt to appease conservative Muslims
because he was scared, after adverse by-election results, that the Congress
could lose their vote. Then, in 1989, when he feared this had turned Hindus
against him, he facilitated the shilanyas and sent home minister Buta Singh
to participate. Weeks later he began his general election campaign from
Faizabad promising Ram Rajya.

However, Rajiv Gandhi also made sectarian appeals to India’s Christian
minority. The Congress manifesto in January 1989 for the Mizoram election
promised to promote ‘Christian socialism’. This was a blatant attempt to
get the church on its side. It succeeded but it was hardly a shining
example of the Congress’ secularism.

Of course, none of this was revealed by either the BJP or the Congress. But
then you wouldn’t expect them to incriminate themselves. However, the next
time the BJP claims a clean-chit for Modi or the Congress trumpets its
secularism, you’ll know there’s more to either story than we’re being told.


-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to