I/II.
[It is for the respective state governments to compensate the victims of
wrongful framing and act against the errant police officers, law and order
being a state subject.
So while the spirit of the submission made is absolutely fine, the specific
demand that the Union Home Minister should act against the errant police
officers appears to be somewhat off the mark.]

http://www.firstpost.com/india/shinde-should-act-against-cops-framing-muslim-youth-activists-1145725.html

Shinde should act against cops framing Muslim youth: Activists
*by Pallavi Polanki *Oct 1, 2013

The initiation of criminal proceedings against police officers indicted by
courts of wrongfully implicating Muslim youth will alone prove the
government’s seriousness in bringing justice to the victims, say activists.

“The Home Minister has not said anything new. The time has come for the
government to act. The government has to show seriousness by prosecuting
officers guilty of malicious prosecution. It is not as if police officers
have not been indicted by the courts. But till date, no action has been
taken against those officers,” Ahmed Sohaib of Jamia Teachers Solidarity
Association (JTSA), said.

The organisation has been a vocal critic of how state machinery has been
used to target innocent Muslim youths in the name of terror.

The JTSA has recently compiled a report “Framed, Damned Acquitted –
Dossiers of a ‘very’ Special Cell” documenting 16 terror cases between 1992
and 2012 in which those arrested , mainly by the Delhi Police Special Cell,
were accused of being members of terrorist organisation but were
subsequently acquitted of all charges by the courts.

One such case, where a Delhi court came down heavily against the Delhi
Police’s role and indicted officers involved, relates to an encounter
orchestrated by Special Cell in 2005 where it claimed to have arrested four
‘terrorists’ after a gunfight on the Delhi –Gurgaon road.

In a strong judgement delivered in 2011, not only did the judge acquit all
the accused arrested in the case, but also ordered a criminal investigation
into the role of police officers involved.

In his judgement, the judge said, “These four police officers (referring to
the team led by special cell officer Ravinder Tyagi) have brought utter
shame and disrepute to the whole Delhi Police force. In my opinion, there
cannot be any more serious or grave crime than a police officer framing an
innocent citizen in a false criminal case. It is not only unethical but
also illegal for an investigating agency to resort to concoction, padding,
fabrication of evidence — all serious offences under the law even to bring
a known criminal to justice.”

“I, therefore, direct the Commissioner of Police, Delhi, to initiate
appropriate enquiry against the four police officers S I RavinderTyagi, SI
Nirakar, SI Charan Singh and SI Mahender Singh or the misuse and abuse of
their powers as a police officer, as detailed herein-above,” the court
said.

With the case in appeal in the High Court, the officers in question have
not only remained scot-free, but some have even been awarded medals by the
government.

Shinde, in his letter to chief ministers which has sparked off a
controversy, wrote, “The Central government has received several
representations alleging harassment of innocent Muslim youth by law
enforcement agencies. Some of the minority youth have started feeling that
they are deliberately targeted and deprived of their rights. The government
has to ensure that no innocent person is subjected to undue harassment.”

Directions by the Home Minister to the CMs in his letter include setting up
of fast-track courts in consultation with the High Court to try
terror-related cases, strict action against police officers in cases of
mala fide arrests of Muslim youth and compensation to those acquitted in
terror-related cases.

According to PTI, Minorities Affairs Minister K Rahman Khan had written to
Shinde informing him about “wrongful arrests” and concerns expressed by
Muslim bodies about the misuse provisions of the Unlawful Activities
Prevention Act against the Muslim community.

Speaking in the context of the 2008 Batla House encounter, in the aftermath
of which JTSA was formed, and the impact it had on university students and
the community, Sohaib said, “There was and still is insecurity among
students. Students from Azamgarh even now find it difficult to rent houses
here. Initially, there was lot of fear and panic in the community. Students
and youth were being picked up randomly.”

The 2008 shoot-out between the Delhi Police Special Cell and alleged
terrorists left two of them (from Azamgarh, Uttar Pradesh) and a police
inspector dead. The lone accused in the case was held guilty of firing at
police officials and was awarded life imprisonment by a Delhi court in July
this year. The JTSA, however, maintains that the encounter was staged.

On the government’s proposal to compensate victims of mala fide police
arrests, the Jamia University teacher said, “It is for the government to
decide how it wants to compensate someone who has been wrongly implicated
and acquitted by the court seven, 10, 14 years later. For a life that has
been shattered in this way,  monetary compensation is only a token. But
even that has not happened.”

II.
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/nobody-can-bring-back-my-four-years-lost-in-prison/1176617/0

'Nobody can bring back my four years lost in prison'
VijaitaSingh <http://www.indianexpress.com/columnist/vijaitasingh/> : New
Delhi, Tue Oct 01 2013, 02:23 hrs
Ashiq Ali Bhatt, now 30 years old, cannot stop smiling as he sits in one of
the courtrooms at Tis Hazari complex with his father whom he was meeting
after 15 years. Bhatt was anxiously waiting for the legal formalities to
get over so that he could walk free from Tihar Jail in the next few hours.
Arrested and jailed for planning a 26/11-type attack in Delhi, Bhatt is
content that he has finally been cleared of the terror charges — after four
years.

"If I had committed some wrong and then put behind bars, it would still
have been acceptable. But I had to spend four years in prison for a crime I
never committed. There is no point mentioning the torture I went through.
Nobody can bring back those years," says Bhatt, dressed in a white
kurta-pyjama as he waits for the judge to complete the legal formalities
which would lead to his release.

Bhatt, a resident of Kathua in Jammu and Kashmir, and Javed Ahmed Tantray
(37) from Kupwara were acquitted by a sessions court last week with the
judge saying it was a "clear-cut plant case" by the Special Cell of the
Delhi Police. Police had claimed the duo were members of the banned Hizbul
Mujahideen and were in Delhi to carry out suicide attacks ahead of
Independence Day celebrations in the capital in 2009. Police also claimed
to have recovered two AK-47 rifles, two pairs of loaded magazines and two
hand grenades from their car.

Belonging to poor background, their families had to borrow Rs 20,000 to
submit as surety before the court.

"They had picked me from Gorakhpur while I was boarding a train for Jammu.
After keeping me in detention for four days in Delhi, they produced me
before the court on charges of planning suicide attacks. It was the first
time, that too in police custody, that I met Tantray — the other person who
was arrested and said to have been planning the attacks with me. Police
threatened and beat us up to accept the charges," says Bhatt.

Bhatt's father Abdul Lateef, a daily-wage labourer, never came to Delhi all
these years as it was too expensive.

"As soon as I got the news that my son had been acquitted, we decided to
reach Delhi. We stood all day and night in the general compartment of the
train and finally reached here on Sunday. I could not have afforded any
other thing, even on a very good day, I earn a mere Rs 100," says Lateef.

"My son left home when he was very young — maybe 14 or 15 years old. We had
no idea where he was until 2009 when we got a call from police that he has
been arrested in Delhi. Even then we could not come as we had no money. I'm
meeting him today."

Bhatt says he went to Nepal in search of employment. He claims he was
working there at a shop but is silent when asked about the exact nature of
his job. In 2009, he came to Gorakhpur to return to Jammu but was picked up
by policemen in plainclothes.

"Nobody should go through what I have been through. It's like hell living
in prison. Thankfully, I took to reading the Quran and could keep myself
sane all these years," says Bhatt.

Tantray used to work at a chemist's shop in Kupwara. "I was 33 years old
when I was arrested.

I had come to Delhi for some work. I swear I will not come back here again
in my life. As soon as

I reached Delhi, I was picked up by plainclothes policemen and put behind
bars. I do not know what will I do once I return home, maybe I will smoke a
hookah and live in my village all my life," says a bitter Tantrey.
-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to