http://kafila.org/2013/10/13/the-nation-did-not-want-to-know-about-laxmanpur-bathe-and-that-is-why-sachin-tendulkar-is-god/

The Nation did not want to know about Laxmanpur Bathe and that is why
Sachin Tendulkar is ‘God’
OCTOBER 13, 2013
by Shuddhabrata Sengupta <http://kafila.org/author/musafir/>

‘No Results Found’ on Searching for Laxmanpur Bathe in Times Now on the
night of Oct 12-13, 2013

In a country where the bloodthirsty rhetoric of ‘hang them, shoot them’, an
‘eye for an eye’ and ‘their heads for our heads’ is heard so regularly, and
so loudly on prime time television, we were greeted by an odd and chilling
silence in the course of this week. It wasn’t for a lack of noise, vendetta
laced sound-bytes, storms in tea-cups, or of talking heads.

While every channel debated (at inordinate length) the consequences of the
banal inevitability of a sportsman retiring from his game while the going
was good, or continued to compare ‘Pappu’ and ‘Feku,  a striking piece of
news virtually failed to ‘break’ into our televised ‘national’
consciousness.

We heard from fasting politicians, approaching cyclones, (once more) about
the mortal remains of Captain Saurabh Kalia, the shenanigans of Asaram
Bapu’s son, about whether or not Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif had
set up a trap for Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, and most
importantly, again and again, about the impending retirement of Sachin
Tendulkar, who was also declared to be ‘God’.

On the 9th of October, two days before the day that *Sachin Tendulkar* retired
from test Cricket (since that is how this country chooses to remember
history, we might as well call days before October 11, 2013 as BGR – or
‘Before God Retired’) the honorable Patna High Court acquitted twenty six
men belonging to the Ranveer Sena, an upper caste militia accused of
butchering fifty eight dalit men, women and children in the course of what
came to be known as the
‘Laxmanpur-Bathe<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laxmanpur_Bathe>‘
massacre in Bihar’s Arwal district in 1997. The youngest of those killed
had been a one year old child.

Central Bihar has a long history of caste violence, and the brunt of this
violence has largely been borne by lower castes, and groups allied to them.
A chronology of caste motivated massacres in Bihar from
1976-2001<http://www.satp.org/satporgtp/countries/india/terroristoutfits/massacres.htm>
lists
more than eighty massacres where the victims have been people of the lower
castes, or members of political groups seen as being their partisans.
Massacres of upper caste villagers hover around fifteen. In the case
of the Bara
Massacre <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bara_Massacre>, when MCC (Maoist
Communist Centre) cadres killed several upper caste villagers known to have
links with the Savarna Sena (a precursor to the Ranveer Sena) in  February
1992, it led to the invocation of TADA by the then Lalu Prasad Yadav
government in Bihar. In 2001, the special TADA court and the District and
Sessions Court in Gaya awarded death sentences to several of the accused.
Some of which were read down to life imprisonment by the Supreme Court in
2002. The very different destiny of the accused in the Bara Carnage case
(where upper caste villagers were killed) and in all the significant
carnages in Bihar where the victims belong to lower castes tell their own
tale. In Bihar, if you are a lower caste villager who participates in the
killing of upper caste militia men – you get a death sentence, or life
imprisonment. If you are a upper caste militia man who participates in the
killing of lower caste men, you walk free.

The 
Hindu<http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/patna-high-court-acquits-all-26-accused-in-laxmanpur-bathe-massacre-case/article5218083.ece>
in
its report mentions that  the then president of India, K.R. Narayanan, had
called the Laxmanpur Bathe Massacre a ‘national shame’ in 1997. But ever
since the 9th of October this year, the verdict itself seems to have
rattled no significant nation wide television consciences. What Patliputra
thinks today, Lutyens’ Delhi think tomorrow.

Newspaper correspondents and some news blog writers have been somewhat more
alert, and at least one major television channel –
NDTV<http://www.ndtv.com/video/player/news/high-court-acquits-26-accused-in-1997-dalit-massacre-case-in-bihar/293800>,
to my knowledge, has carried an ‘objective’ report of the acquittal.

However, although there were demonstrations in
Patna<http://sp.m.timesofindia.com/city/patna/cpi-ml-rally-against-baathe-carnage-acquittals/articleshow/23930386.cms>,
and even in  Delhi – outside BIhar Bhavan in Chanakyapuri
<http://beyondheadlines.in/2013/10/cpiml-protests-patna-high-court-verdict-on-laxmanpur-bathe-massacre/>people
stood in protest, signifying, yet again, that young people in Delhi do come
out on to the streets when people in remote corners of the countryside feel
that they have been denied justice, not a single television channel,
thought it fit to report them.

(Some newspapers, such as the Times of India, did report the Patna
demonstration, and theHindu carried a photograph
<http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-newdelhi/aap-outraged-at-acquittals-in-laxmanpurbathe-massacre/article5227510.ece>of
a demonstration in Delhi nested within a report of the Aam Admi Party’s
criticism of the Patna High Court Verdict)

Only three political parties – *CPI(ML-Liberation), CPI(M)* and* Aam Aadmi
Party* have formally expressed criticism of the Patna High Court verdict.
The news reportage of their criticism has been muted at best. *Sharad Yadav*,
president of the JD(U), the party which rules Bihar, has been reported in
the Business 
Standard<http://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/hc-order-in-laxmanpur-bathe-case-painful-jd-u-113101100840_1.html>
as
saying (characteristically) that the verdict called for higher reservations
for lower castes in the Judiciary. He thought the verdict was ‘painful’.
Which is somewhat surprising, since the government led by his party,
under *Nitish
Kumar*, did not choose to pursue the course that a robust prosecution would
have. The Bihar Government has reportedly stated that it will contest the
Patna High Court’s verdict. But given the way it has handled the
prosecution so far, this contest is not likely to be more than a
half-hearted formality.

It may be relevant to recall that *Nitish Kumar* ‘s government in Bihar
(JD-U, at that time in coalition with the BJP)  disbanded (in April 2006)
the Justice Amir Das Commission of
Enquiry<http://ibnlive.in.com/news/caste-army-has-politician-friends/9042-4.html>
set
up to look into the links and the patronage that the Ranveer Sena militia
had within the political parties in Bihar within six months of taking power
in November 2005. This is perhaps one executive order that Nitish Kumar and
*Lalu Prasad Yadav* would have been in agreement on, because the parties
they led would both stand to lose were the Amir Das Commission’s findings
on the links between the Ranveer Sena and political parties in Bihar to
ever be made formally public. The Lalu Yadav-Rabri Devi regime, though it
set up the Amir Das Commission under intense public pressure, was not
averse to its findings being consigned to oblivion.

The links between Ranveer Sena thugs and politicians that the *Amir Das
Commission*investigated cut across party lines, and included patronage
networks deep within the BJP, the RJD, JD(U) and the Congress. It is
unlikely, given the JD(U)’s known links to the Ranveer Sena, that it will
pursue the Laxmanpur Bathe case with any seriousness.

*Piyush Pushpak *and* Prabhakar Kumar*, in their story on CNN IBN (see link
above) had listed the politicians that were to be named by the Justice Amir
Das Committee Report. This list is a veritable ‘who’s-who’ of Bihar
politics, and even includes influential outsiders like Murli Manohar Joshi,
the national level BJP leader from neighbouring Uttar Pradesh. This story,
based on the access that CNN-IBN had to the unpublished Amir Das Commission
Report is worth quoting in some detail to get a sense of the Ranveer Sena’s
reach in Bihar politics.

“…There’s Sushil Modi , Kanti Singh, Akhileshwar Singh, Murli Manohar
Joshi, and CP Thakur, among others,” Lala Ramchandra Prasad Verma, Personal
Assistant to Chairman of Aamir Das Commission says.

(Sushil) Modi ((Bihar state BJP chief and erstwhile coalition partner of
Nitish Kumar) has been charged with having a nexus with the Ranvir Sena and
seeking help from the outfit during elections. Murli Manohar Joshi, has
been charged with threatening the officer-in-charge of Paliganj Police
station against taking action in the Haibaspur massacre.

Another BJP bigwig, C P Thakur, has been named for attending meetings of
the outfit in 1997 ahead of the Haibaspur massacre and being a close aide
of Ranveer Sena’s supremo Brahmeshwar Mukhia.

Akhilesh Singh; Union Minister of State, RJD has been charged with seeking
help from the banned outfit during elections and funding Sena’s activities;
Kanti Singh, Minister of State, and a close associate of former Bihar CM
Lalu Prasad Yadav has been charged with seeking help from Sunil Pandey, a
prominent Sena leader, during 1996 Parliamentary elections.

Others named in the report are senior RJD leader Shivanand Tiwari, former
president of the Bihar Congress Committee Ram Jatan Sinha, Nand Kishore
Yadav, a minister with the Nitish government, Arun Kumar, Ex MP, JD(U)
Mundrika Singh Yadav, Former RJD minister Raghunath Jha, Former president
of Samta Party, Narendra Pandey alias Sunil Pandey, Nitish Kumar loyalist
and JD(U) MLA Krishna Sardar, former MLA Akhlaque Ahmed, former MLA Jagdish
Sharma, former MPs, late Chandradev Prasad Verma and late Ram Lakhan Singh
Yadav…”

*‘Caste Army Has Politician Friends’ by Piyush Pushpak and Prabhakar Kumar,
CNN-IBN, April 29, 2006*

Apart from the token noises made by Sharad Yadav, Bihar’s mainstream
politicians (RJD, BJP, Congress, JD-U) have maintained a studied silence,
No one seems to have thought it fit to ask these otherwise voluble
gentlemen why they have suddenly lost the ability to speak on Laxmanpur
Bathe.

Incidentally, Brahmeshwar Singh
Mukhiya<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brahmeshwar_Singh> the
head of the Ranveer Sena, was never tried for his role in the
Laxmanpur-Bathe massacre. The case against him was closed as he was said to
be ‘absconding’ and ‘untraceable’. The fact that he was ‘absconding’ and
‘untraceable’ through all these years in the secure environs of Ara Central
Prison (where he was then undergoing detention in connection with another
case since 2002), as reported by the
Hindu<http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/will-brahmeshwar-singh-be-ever-brought-to-justice/article402991.ece?ref=relatedNews>,
as far back as in 2010, seems to have been overlooked by the criminal
justice system in Bihar.

Governments came and went in Bihar, coalitions formed and dissolved, but
the prosecution of Laxmanpur Bathe, once it reached the High Court, stayed
exactly where it was – nowhere. Eventually, *Brahmeshwar Singh Mukhiya* was
released on bail, acquitted and went on to form an organization called *Akhil
Bharatiya Rashtravadi Kisan Sangathan* (All India Nationalist Farmers
Organization). He was murdered on the 1st of June, 2012 by six unknown
assailants in a ‘drive-by’ killing from a motorcycle. Brahmeshwar Singh
Mukhiya was never properly investigated for Laxmanpur Bathe (or for any
other massacre) that he had been allegedly involved in.

The carnage at Laxmanpur Bathe did not lack eyewitnesses. *Rahi Gaikwad*, a
reporter for the Hindu, has done excellent reporting on how the witnesses
and survivors feel in the wake of the
verdict<http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/after-acquittals-fear-haunts-dalit-hamlet/article5222175.ece?ref=relatedNews>.
Here is an extract from her report.

Laxman Rajvanshi is a survivor and eyewitness who testified in court. “Give
us justice or drown us,” he said.Asked about the High Court’s observation
that witnesses were unreliable, he said: “How could I not have recognised
them? We stay in the same village and I see them about 10 times a day! We
worked on their fields. We had no inkling of this attack, otherwise we
would have been alert. The Nitish Kumar government is hand in glove with
the feudal elements. He slotted us into the Mahadalit category, collected
our votes and then cut our throats.”

*‘After Acquittals, Fear Haunts Dalit Hamlet‘ by Rahi Gaikwad, Hindu,
October 11, 2013*

*Deepu Sebastian Edmond*, writes in from Arwal in the Indian Express -

…”I remember everything,” declared Munni Rajbansi, who was witness number
12. Munni watched as his wife, daughter-in-law, granddaughter and grandson,
the infant Chhotelal, were murdered. “I saw them all clearly – they were
carrying five-cell torches. I remember every detail,” he said.
The high court thought his evidence was “quite improbable” as it was
unlikely he would have left his hiding place and also because there was no
light. The court also junked the testimony of Binod Paswan, on whose
complaint the whole case is based. Binod, the only witness to identify all
26 acquitted, lost seven of his family…

*‘Acquittals Kindle New Fear in Bihar’s Caste Battleground’ by Deepu
Sebastian Edmond, Indian Express, October 11, 2013*

In FirstPost, too, we get a good report on survivors by *Manoj
Kumar*.<http://m.firstpost.com/politics/laxmanpur-bathe-massacre-no-one-killed-58-dalits--1166975.html?page=1>

…The villagers waiting for justice for more than a generation are in a
shock after the verdict. “There is no law to protect us because we are
poor,” said 67-year-old Laxman Rajvanshi who lost three members of his
family in the brutal attack, allegedly by the Ranvir Sena, the militia of
the upper castes. “We have been denied justice,” rues another villager
Baudh Paswan, 70, saying, “Sarkar, judge, collector aur thana ne bata diya
ki garib ki aukat bakari ki hoti hai (Everyone in the system has made us
believe we are rubbish)”.The villagers are not wholly wrong. This is the
fourth time in quick succession that all the accused in massacre cases have
been acquitted by the court for “lack of evidence”. Earlier in July this
year, nine of the 10 persons convicted for killing 34 Dalit villagers at
Miyanpur village in Aurangabad district were acquitted by the Patna High
Court, six years after they were convicted by a special district court. The
massacre was carried out on June 16, 2000 by Ranvir Sena men in retaliation
to the killing of upper caste people at Senari village in neighbouring
Jehanabad district earlier that year.Again in March this year, all the 11
accused convicted by a lower court for the massacre of 10 CPI-ML
sympathisers at Nagari village in Bhojpur district in November 1998 were
acquitted by the high court. It was a similar verdict in case of the
infamous Bathani Tola massacre in which all the 23 convicts declared guilty
by a lower court for the cold-blooded killing of 21 dalit villagers were
acquitted by the high court last year. The Bathani Tola massacre had taken
place in Bhojpur district in July 1996. In all the incidents, Ranvir Sena
men were allegedly involved but all walked free ultimately….

*‘Laxmanpur Bathe Massacre: no one killed 58 Dalits’ by Manoj Kumar, First
Post, October 11, 2013*

Four massacres, *Miyanpur, Nagari, Baithani Tola, Laxmanpur Bathe* – 113
people killed, 48 accused acquitted, by the same high court in a very short
span of time. Perhaps we should be looking for a pattern here.

*The Court also directed the State to pay compensation to the next of kin
of the 58 deceased and 4 injured of Laxmanpur Bathe from its fund. The
Court ordered the trial court to calculate the amount of compensation after
taking into account the age, income of the deceased and the injured in the
light of the provisions of Section 163-A and II Schedule of the Motor
Vehicles Act, 1988.  [State of Bihar v. Girja Singh, Death Reference No.5
of 2010, Decided on 9/10/2013] -SCC*

Given the care with which it has read the relevant provisions of the *Motor
Vehicles Act*, as opposed to attending to the statements of the witnesses
and the circumstances of the case, perhaps, the learned judges of the
Patna High Court had come to the conclusion that the Laxmanpur Bathe
Massacre was something in the nature of a rather unfortunate automobile
accident.

I do not, now, or ever will, support the awarding of the death penalty, not
even to those guilty of the Laxmanpur Bathe massacre, or for that matter to
those accused of murderous rape or acts of terror. Not because I am
indifferent to these crimes and to their consequences, but because I
believe that the death penalty institutionalizes and sanitizes the violence
of state power in society in a way that I find unacceptable. But being
opposed, in principle, to the death penalty does not mean, and cannot under
any circumstances be read to mean, tacit complicity or agreement with a
blatantly unjust acquittal. Had Justices V.N. Sinha and A.K. Lal of
division bench of the Patna High Court chosen to apply their minds
adequately to the matter before them they could have found many choices
other than the simple awarding of death penalties available to them. These
possibilities included the option of awarding sentences of rigorous life
imprisonment and other penalties that would have fit the gravity of the
crime, and at the same time could have effectively raised the bar of
judicial sentencing in Indian courts by refusing to automatically go the
‘death penalty’ route in such circumstances. That they refused to do so,
means that the justice system in Bihar, and by extension in India has
undergone a serious setback.

The people of Laxmanpur Bathe will live in the knowledge that the men who
butchered their kin and neighbors will now walk in the halo of impunity.
Ordinarily, this would have concerned us all.

But then, we live in extraordinary times. *Sachin Tendulkar* has retired,
and on Friday evening, as the week closed in TV land, *Arnab Goswami*, and
the ‘nation’ simply did not want to know about much else. The nation
certainly did not want to have its grip over geography challenged. It
neither knew, nor wanted to know, where Laxmanpur Bathe was.

The next time this hyperventilating, televised, smug ‘nation’  wants to
know ‘why X, Y, or Z is not being hanged’ for something that they did or
did not commit, or why we are not slitting throats at the border in
retaliation (as if we don’t), anyone with a single ethical bone in their
body should simply refuse to heed its call.

-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to