The coverage of this bill should be broadend  with including ethnic minorities 
and also groups which hold less social power including political power . 
There are groups who cannot use political pressure to achieve its rights . They 
also should be brought under the purview of this bill . For example some 
specific caste which does not include in the category of SC/ST . 
 
Victim can be someone not listed in the group . For example , a person 
interfering in social and religious issues from the majority group and happens 
to be a victim for his actions against the communal violence . 
 
 
Sreenivas
 
 
 

________________________________
From: Sukla Sen <[email protected]>
To: a d <[email protected]>; IHRO <[email protected]>; 
issueonline <[email protected]>; progressive-interactions 
<[email protected]>; justice-and-gujarat 
<[email protected]>; indiathinkersnet 
<[email protected]>; mahajanapada 
<[email protected]>; bahujan <[email protected]>; 
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
Cc: anil sharma <[email protected]>; abhijit sett 
<[email protected]>; ashish jauhari <[email protected]> 
Sent: Saturday, 9 November 2013 11:15 AM
Subject: [GreenYouth] Re: communal



This is just scare mongering by the Sangh Brigade. 

The draft bill proposes to provide additional protection to religious and 
linguistic minorities in a state and also to the members of the SC/ST 
communities.
In fact Hindus too would get the special protection of the (proposed) Act where 
they are in minority: for example in Punjab, Mizoram, Nagaland and Meghalaya. 
And also as the members of the "linguistic minorities" in a state or the SC/ST 
will get the special protection.

(Three definitions in the proposed Bill are of crucial importance:
1. “communal and targeted violence” means and includes any act or series of 
acts, whether spontaneous or planned, resulting in injury or harm to the person 
and or property, knowingly directed against any person by virtue of his or her 
membership of any group. 
2. “group” means a religious or linguistic minority, in any State in the Union 
of India, or Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes within the meaning of 
clauses (24) and (25) of Article 366 of the Constitution of India;
3. “victim” means any person belonging to a group as defined under this Act, 
who has suffered physical, mental, psychological or monetary harm or harm to 
his or her property as a result of the commission of any offence under this 
Act, and includes his or her relatives, legal guardian and legal heirs, 
wherever appropriate;) 

The Bill is yet to be tabled in the Parliament. (In fact, even the Cabinet is 
yet to discuss the draft and approve.) Once (if at all) tabled, its provisions 
will be debated threadbare or, alternately, it will be referred to the 
Parliamentary Standing Committee (attached to the Ministry of Home Affairs), 
which will examine it in details.

Moreover, the ruling alliance is in minority in the Rajya Sabha. Even in the 
Lok Sabha, the Congress is in minority.
So the (proposed) Bill can in no way be passed without the support of a very 
substantial section of the non-Congress parties.

(Here is an appeal to table the Bill in the Rajya Sabha: 
<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fsecure.avaaz.org%2Fen%2Fpetition%2FEnd_Impunity_for_Mass_Crimes_Table_the_PCTV_Bill_in_the_Upper_House_of_Indian_Parliament_after_a_Million_Voices_speak%2F%3Ffbdm&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNFVEHw074jOZ1EZ6qnBk3Zj8t0_yw>.)

Sukla



On 9 November 2013 10:55, a d <[email protected]> wrote:

 
>
>This is a very serious matter concerning Hindus and hence no media, newspapers 
>or TV news channels is discussing it.
>
>In three days, most people in India will have this message.
>
>"Prevention of Communal and Targeted Violence Bill" (PCTV Bill)
>
>Read carefully what Dr. Subramanian Swamy has analysed about that Bill:
>
>Minority institutions including Jamait-e-Ulema are forcing Congress for 
>passing this bill. Congress wants this bill to win 2014 election with 
>'Minority' votes.
>
>Salient features of The Prevention of Communal and Targeted Violence Bill- 
>PCTV Bill :-
>
>1) Based on the presumption that all 'Hindus are Criminals and Rioters' ,this 
>law can be invoked only against Hindus by minorities. (the bill defines 
>Muslims, Christians etc. as “the Minority Group” in (sec 3.e))
>
>2) Merely a complaint will be sufficient to file a FIR and the Hindu against 
>whom the complaint is made, will be immediately arrested and assumed guilty 
>UNLESS PROVEN otherwise (In normal criminal procedure, an accused is assumed 
>innocent unless proven guilty);
>
>3) All crimes under this Bill are Cognizable and Non-bailable [Clause 56 of 
>may 2011 version];
>
>4) It can trigger a new wave of extortion by minority groups against Hindus, 
>the majority of whom are the working and business class. This will have 
>colossal negative repercussions for the Indian economy.
>
>5) Section 129 states that for prosecution of offences under Sec 9 there will 
>be no limitation of time. It means a 'Minority' can reopen all cases against 
>Hindus, all past cases right from 1950 onwards.
>
>6) Under Sec. 42, A minority witness giving false statement before National 
>authority CANNOT be prosecuted for giving FALSE evidence against a Hindu.
>___________________________
>
>Summary ?
>Just like Pakistan, Bangladesh or Kashmir,
>Hindus will be left with 3 options:
>(i) Convert
>(ii) Flee
>(iii) Suffer entire life
>
>So oppose this Anti-Hindu, Anti-Bharat Bill by making all Hindus aware of its 
>dangers and unite to fight it and remove the Anti-Hindu & Anti-Bharat party 
>who drafted this bill, or be prepared for above 3 options left for you & your 
>children.
>___________________________
>
>Well, now Express report that the powerful Church has set down 27 rules for 
>the political parties to follow during election period.
>Like Sharia,the Church is also earmarking its sphere of influence over & above 
>the laws of the land-may be an indicator
>of Balkanisation.Last but not the least , contrast it with a hypothesis that 
>Ramdev or Ravishanker trying to impose a 
>similar set of rules on anyone ,the Media,political parties,Seculars,Activists 
>like Madam Sukla would have created hell.
>for a change pl. do care for our country.
>s.asim


-- 
Peace Is Doable -- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to