I/IV.
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151800383176491&set=gm.466304033480265&type=1&relevant_count=1
<https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151800383176491&set=gm.466304033480265&type=1>

II/IV.
http://www.truthofgujarat.com/shaken-core-kaun-hai-yeh-insaan-impostor-large/

I was shaken to the core – Kaun Hai Yeh Insaan? Impostor at
large.<http://www.truthofgujarat.com/shaken-core-kaun-hai-yeh-insaan-impostor-large/>
Mukul Sinha <http://www.truthofgujarat.com/author/mukul-sinha/> December
28, 2013

within a few months however , *mindless violence* of 2002 had dealt us
another unexpected blow. Innocents were killed…*I was shaken to the
core.* ‘Grief’
,’Sadness’, ‘Misery’, ‘Pain’, ‘Anguish’, ‘Agony’ – mere words could not
capture the absolute emptiness one felt on witnessing such inhumanity.

[image: Gaurav Yatra September 2002: A Shattered Modi wielding a sword -
SIDDHARTH DARSHAN
KUMAR/AP]<http://www.truthofgujarat.com/shaken-core-kaun-hai-yeh-insaan-impostor-large/gaurav-yatra-september-2002/>Gaurav
Yatra September 2002: A Shattered Modi wielding a sword – SIDDHARTH DARSHAN
KUMAR/AP

Who could have used such meloncholic words and phrases to describe his own
“shattered feelings” for the 2002 Gujarat violence? Even if Amitabh
Bachchan gave you unlimited lifelines, you wouldn’t have guessed that the
above lines were actually authored by someone who calls himself Narendra
Modi and blogs on a website called narendramodi.in. The man who presided
over the most brutal killings of over 1000 innocent men, women and children
and had actually held a “*Gaurav (glory) Yatra*” in September, 2002, within
seven months of the massacre to*celebrate* it, now wants us to believe the
he was shaken to the core!

Modi claimed in his blog that words like sadness, pain etc cannot capture
his real feelings. It was absolute emptiness he felt on witnessing such
inhumanity! *How can a man be such a big hypocrite?* Let us recall what he
had actually said in his speech in Bahucharji, Mehsana district, on 9
September, 2002, as a part of his Gaurav (glory) Yatra.

*What brothers, should we run relief camps? Should I start
children-producing centres?* We want to achieve progress by pursuing the
policy of family planning. We are five, they have 25! Can’t Gujarat
implement family planning? Whose inhibitions are coming in our way? Which
religious sect is coming in the way? Why is money not reaching the poor? *If
some people go on producing children, their children will do cycle puncture
repair only.*

This is how Modi had expressed his ‘anguish’ and ‘pain’ on September 9th,
2002.

These children producing centres as Mr Modi refers to relief camps were
home to over 98,000 (NHRC figure) men, women and children who had to leave
their homes to save their lives. This extremely shattered man who was also
supposed to be the Chief Minister of the State had refused to visit a
single relief camp till former Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee visited
Shah Alam relief camp in Ahmedabad on April 4, 2002 – a full 35 days after
the massacre. A story in Frontline (Volume 19 – Issue 10, May 11-24, 2002)
reported the miserable conditions existing in the relief camps in Gujarat:

After Noorbanu and others in the Jehangir Nagar relief camp at Vatva
received paltry sums as compensation for housing, the occupants of the camp
have refused the government’s cheques. Of the 300-odd families in the camp,
only 23 have received housing compensation so far.

The refugees’ hopes of returning home grow dimmer as the violence continues
and the government’s half-hearted rehabilitation measures fail to provide
any real support. Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee’s efforts to reassure
the riot-affected people during his visit to Gujarat on April 4 came rather
late – 35 days after the violence began. His promises regarding relief and
rehabilitation have not yet been implemented properly by the State
government. *Theonly time Chief Minister Narendra Modi visited a relief
camp housing Muslims was when he trailed the Prime Minister.*

Let us now compare the lie spelt out in his latest blog expressing anguish
and pain for the poor riot victims. Modi states that:

on one side was the pain of the victims of the earthquakes and on the other
the pain of the victims of the riots. In decisively confronting this great
turmoil, I had to single-mindedly focus all strength given to me by the
almighty on the task of peace, justice and rehabilitation.

The reality of 2002 and the relief camps as reported in the Frontline story
wholly destroys the carefully worded blog that is supposed to impress the
gullible citizens so that Modi gets a clean chit in the eyes of the would
be 2014 voters.

The same man who now calls the riots as “mindless violence” had called the
pogrom of 2002 a “mass agitation”. In an interview, also published on
Modi’s original and now obliterated
website<http://web.archive.org/web/20030304152618/http://www.narendramodi.com/interview11.htm>
and
given to then Senior Editor V. Shankar Aiyar and Special Correspondent Uday
Mahurkar of India Today on March 18, 2002, while responding to a question
about the brutality of the riots, this is what Modi had stated:
[image: Narendra Modi: Gujarat Riots was a Mass
Agitation]<http://www.truthofgujarat.com/narendra-modi-gujarat-riots-like-mass-agitation/mass-agitation/>Narendra
Modi: Gujarat Riots was a Mass Agitation

Q. Why do you think the rioting had such a brutal tinge to it?
A. It wasn’t merely a communal riot but something *like a mass agitation*.

If REAL Modi is the man who called the riots a “mass agitation” and
referred to the ensuing relief camps housing over 98,000 riot victims as
“children producing centres” not worthy enough to be graced by him, who is
this impostor pretending to be a SHATTERED Modi on narendramodi.in?
III/IV.
https://www.facebook.com/notes/jairus-banaji/the-bloggers-anguish/10151779284725064

The blogger's anguish
28 December 2013 at
10:14<https://www.facebook.com/notes/jairus-banaji/the-bloggers-anguish/10151779284725064#>



‘Unimaginable suffering’,  ‘absolute emptiness’, ‘agonizing days’, ‘shaken
to the core’…Nope, this isn’t some existentialist potboiler, it’s Mr
I-can't-wait-to-be-Prime-Minister blogging with contrived passion about how
devastated he was by the horrific violence that exploded*under his watchful
gaze* back in 2002. 'Grief', 'sadness', 'misery', 'pain', 'anguish' –
these are ‘mere words’, he says, compared to the state of utter depletion
*he* was suffering at the time. Okay, this isn’t Booker prize stuff but in
a culture where no politician *ever* bares his/her soul quite this way,
what is *this* politician up to?  From the *Art of Secrecy* (the bestseller
commonly known as Snoopgate) to *Theatre of Hypocrisy* (Sadbhavana), we’ve
had a series of stunning *oeuvres* in the last few years, is this the
latest instalment?


When a Washington lobbyist firm helped with his massive image makeover, the
PR rush that surged through his veins had to be telling him, one can *remake
images like plasticine*. From rabid communalism to super-efficient
capitalism to Mr Compassionate, the angst-ridden leader who saw his ‘loved
ones’ slaughtering his ‘loved ones’ and found himself in a hopeless
labyrinth of solitude. No one knew what he was feeling, no one understood
*him*…



Well, thank God for reality. Thank God for the aged Vithal Pandya and what
he told the Nanavati-Shah Commission on Thursday 3 February 2005. He was 76
at the time and father of the slain ex-minister of Gujarat Haren Pandya:

“Pandya said his son had told him that a meeting of BJP workers took place
in Lunawada in the Panchmahals on February 27, 2002 — the day when the
Godhra carnage took place — where Modi *instructed workers to fan out in
the state*. “Haren told me about the incident. He also told me that the
authorities had instructed the police that revenge for the Godhra deaths
shouldbe allowed and that they should go soft on kar sevaks,” Pandya told
thecommission.

Pandya said, “He (Haren) had observed that this was for the first time that
the state government had supported a bandh call given by an outfit (on
February 28) and no previouschief minister of Gujarat had supported such a
call during past communal riots.””


This was reported in *The Times of India* the very next day (4 February
2005) and has the full ring of authenticity, testimony proffered to a
Commission whose head (Retd. Justice G. T. Nanavati) was *hostile to this
witness*. But the aged Pandya was clearly beyond caring what happened to
him personally when powerful forces could have his son assassinated in
broad daylight with such shameless temerity.


And the notorious meeting on the night of 27 February at the CM’s bungalow?
Haren Pandya was almost certainly killed not for a private conversation
with his dad that told the latter about the instructions conveyed to the
activists gathered at Lunawada but for *his fatal disclosure of the details
of the night meeting in Gandhinagar*. Here’s a report dated 3 June 2002:


“The minister spoke to the tribunal on the condition that it would not name
him in its finalreport. Another member of the panel has also confirmed the
minister'sdeposition.

The minister told *Outlook* that in his deposition, he revealed that on the
night of February 27, Modi summoned DGP K. Chakravarthy, commissioner
ofpolice, Ahmedabad, P.C. Pande, chief secretary G. Subarao, home secretary
Ashok Narayan, secretary to the home department K. Nityanand (a serving
police officer of IG rank on deputation) and DGP (IB) G.S. Raigar. Also
present wereofficers from the CM's office: P.K. Mishra, Anil Mukhim and
A.K. Sharma. The minister also told *Outlook* that the meeting was held at
the CM'sbungalow.

The minister told the tribunal that in the two-hour meeting, *Modi made it
clear there would be justice for Godhra the next day, during the VHP-called
bandh*. He ordered that the police should not come in the way of "the Hindu
backlash". At one point in this briefing, according to the minister's
statement to the tribunal, DGP Chakravarthy vehemently protested. But *he
was harshly told by Modi to shut up and obey*. Commissioner Pande, says the
minister, would later show remorse in private but at that meeting didn't
have the guts to object.

According to the deposition, it was a typical Modi meeting: more orders
than discussion. By the end of it, *the CM ensured that his top
officials—especially the police—would stay out of the way of Sangh parivar
men*. The word was passed on to the mobs.”


The word was passed on to the mobs. So, what about the 'anguish'? 'Pain'?
'Agony'? 'Absolute emptiness'? More like eternal sunshine of a spotless
mind.

IV.
http://blogs.navbharattimes.indiatimes.com/ekla-chalo/entry/narendra-modi-s-crocodile-tears-on-gujarat-riots

इतना न रो कि कब्र में मुर्दे भी हंस पड़ें
नीरेंद्र नागर <http://blogs.navbharattimes.indiatimes.com/ekla-chalo>  Friday
December 27, 2013
Snipped

-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to