[Points to ponder.
The Congress, the Left, the BSP, the DMK, (also the SP) - all have
performed disastrously.
Arguably, so has the AAP, with the (freak?) exception of Punjab.
Leaving aside the too obvious case of the BJP, the AIADMK, the Trinamool
and the BJD have performed rather spectacularly.]

http://www.dnaindia.com/analysis/column-can-the-left-recover-from-its-election-debacle-1997804

 Can the Left recover from its election debacle?
  Thursday, 26 June 2014 - 6:00am IST Updated: Wednesday, 25 June 2014 -
8:09pm IST | Place: Mumbai | Agency: DNA

   Almost as incredible as the Left parties' electoral rout, which halved
   their Lok Sabha seats to their lowest-ever total (12, even counting two
   Left-backed independents), is their failure to come to terms with its
   magnitude, quality and causes. Instead of acknowledging the debacle as the
   result of deep-rooted flaws in its programmes and strategies, a massive
   leadership failure, and its alienation from the people, the Left first
   practised denial by alleging large-scale rigging, then admitted to its
   "poor" showing, and finally accepted its central leaders' "primary
   responsibility for the failure".

The CPM has shrunk to its worst national score, and a pathetic two seats
(the same as the BJP) in West Bengal, which it ruled for 34 years. The sole
consolation is its victory in tiny Tripura (two seats). The CPI and
Revolutionary Socialist Party have been reduced to near-irrelevance with
just one seat each nationally. The Forward Bloc has been wiped out. Worse,
all them have lost not just votes, but chunks of their social base, to the
BJP in a Right-wing wave they did little to resist. In Kerala, the
long-standing trend of the Left winning alternating elections has been
broken.

Yet, no heads have rolled in the Left. The handful of CPM leaders who
offered to resign were told not to: unlike "bourgeois" parties, Marxists
believe in "collective", not "individual" responsibility! Ideologues, who
have long privileged "parliamentary cretinism" (Lenin) way above grassroots
mobilisation, now argue, charlatan-like, that their leaders don't resign on
the basis of election results: these are far less important than a failure
to expand the party's "mass base".

But this denies that flesh-and-blood individual decisions have huge
political consequences: Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee's
Singur-Nandigram-indusrialisation-at-any-cost policy ravaged the CPM's
already-feeble "mass base" in Bengal, and Pinarayi Vijayan's narrow-minded
conservatism has visited devastation upon the Kerala party, whose chances
of winning the 2011 Assembly elections he all but sabotaged. And what of
the central leadership's responsibility/complicity in allowing the Left's
drift towards quasi-neoliberal policies at the state level, which it
rhetorically opposes nationally, and its dogmatic insistence on
organisational Democratic Centralism, which brutally suppresses free
debate?

There's stunning silence on these issues, now postponed to future central
leadership meetings. The CPI, which is usually less dogmatic and more
self-critical, does no better. All that these parties promise is a review
of "the political line and organisational functioning... to take corrective
measures", and forging "close links with the masses" to "conduct struggles"
to defend their "livelihood interests", "secularism and democratic rights".
How, and on what issues, this will be done isn't spelt out.

The only new, and welcome, element is the CPM's decision to enlist
non-party "Marxist experts" to study the social-political impact of
liberalisation to enable the party "to re-invent itself". Past experience
casts doubts on how genuinely open the CPM would be to such independent
analysis.

The Left parties' crisis is existential and comprehensive--encompassing
ideological-programmatic perspectives, political-mobilisation strategies
(to reverse erosion of their cadre, and trade union and kisan bases), and
about reviving internal democracy. Unless they undertake radical, brutally
honest rethinking, and re-establish their once-redoubtable presence in
grassroots struggles, they could go into terminal decline even if they win
a few elections.

That would a great loss for Indian democracy. The Left is virtually the
only part of India's political spectrum with a commitment to the
underprivileged and to emancipatory social change, which isn't mired in
corruption, and has made rich contributions to our cultural, intellectual
and political life. If the Left ceases to exist, we would have to re-invent
it.

*The author is a writer, columnist, and a professor at the Council for
Social Development, Delhi*

-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to