I/III.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/israelgaza-conflict-israel-must-stop-punishing-gazas-people-pleads-un-commissioner-9673778.html
Israel-Gaza conflict: 'Israel must stop punishing Gaza's people,' pleads UN
commissioner As Egypt renews its peace-deal efforts, a top humanitarian
official says it's time to end the crippling seven-year blockade

 Donald Macintyre <http://www.independent.co.uk/biography/donald-macintyre>

GAZA CITY

Sunday 17 August 2014

 The United Nations' top humanitarian official in the Middle East yesterday
issued an impassioned appeal for a new deal for Gaza to end the "collective
punishment" of its 1.8 million inhabitants imposed by Israel's seven-year
blockade of the territory.

As Egyptian mediators prepared to renew efforts today to persuade Israel
and Hamas to agree a durable peace deal to end more than a month of
conflict, Pierre Krähenbühl, Commissoner General of the UN Palestinian
refugee agency UNRWA, warned: "You cannot just return to the pre-existing
conditions under the blockade."

The ending of the blockade is one of Hamas's key demands in the Cairo peace
talks. Yesterday, Hamas's head of foreign affairs, Osama Hamdan, said on
his official Facebook page that Israel's position did not meet the
aspirations of the Palestinians. And he warned: "Israel must accept the
demands of the Palestinian people or face a long war."

Mr Krähenbühl, who has direct responsibility for the education and health
provision for 1.2 million Gazans, said he had been struck before the
conflict started that, with youth unemployment running at 65 per cent and
an increase in those receiving UNRWA (UN Relief and Works Agency) food aid
from 80,000 to 830,000 since 2000, people here had "no freedom of movement,
no real hope that anything significant is going to change, and all that the
result of the blockade". Swiss-born Mr Krähenbühl added: "No one can be
proud of those statistics."

With "tens of thousands" now homeless mainly as a result of Israeli
bombardment, and 225,000 displaced residents still sheltering in UNRWA
schools, he added: "In addition to all that, you now have destruction, loss
of life, injuries, trauma ... you can't have these people, who have already
been affected by the blockade and endured this level of violence, and leave
them like this."

The Commissioner General said an extended ceasefire was "vitally important"
both for Palestinians "who have gone through so much suffering" and for
Israelis, so they could be free of rocket fire "which I have always said
should cease".

But he added that "looking at the lives lost in Gaza and the extent of
destruction, we need something different than returning to the pre-existing
state" of the blockade, which Israel imposed after Hamas's forcible seizure
of full control of the territory in 2007. Mr Krähenbühl said from UNRWA's
perspective the blockade was illegal "under international humanitarian law".

On the most immediate issue - the ban on importing construction materials,
he said it was "socially untenable" for people not to be able to rebuild
their shattered homes. He said he recognised Israel's legitimate security
concerns, but added that the blockade "amounts in many ways to a form of
collective punishment".

He had been struck by a recent conversation with a Gaza businessman who had
lamented that while he had traded with Israelis and learnt to "understand"
their concerns over a long period before the blockade, his children had
never met an Israeli and knew their neighbours through barriers, the
blockade and military interventions with "tanks and shells". Mr Krähenbühl
added: "No longer having the personal knowledge nor being able to engage
with the other is a very serious issue for the future."

He also stepped up pressure on Israel to conduct a "thorough,
comprehensive, open and transparent" investigation into the strikes on
three UN schools used as refuges for displaced residents in Beit Hanoun,
Jabalya and Rafah, which caused multiple deaths and injuries.

The UN has already denounced the lethal Israeli strikes on the schools at
Rafah and Jablaya, the latter hit by artillery shelling. Mr Krähenbühl said
that while he had not had the data to attribute the Beit Hanoun attack to
Israel at the time - and he did not want to pre-judge any inquiry - he did
not think there was "much doubt that it was an Israeli operation".

He said he was not suggesting that those who attacked the schools did so
deliberately, but that Israel had an obligation under international law to
conduct a full investigation as the "party responsible for a military
operation or a shelling that causes loss of life by civilians".

Mr Krähenbühl also denounced an attempted "narrative" which had surfaced in
some Israeli and Western media that because UNRWA had discovered rockets
stored by militants in three of its empty schools this somehow justified
further attacks on UNRWA schools.

"I have to say in the strongest terms that not only resists any honest
scrutiny under international humanitarian law, but it's just completely
unacceptable and irresponsible," he said.

Mr Krähenbühl, who has 25 years' experience of war zones, said that 11
UNRWA staff members had been killed in this conflict and it was a tribute
to the "courage and resolve" of UNRWA's 12,500 staff that they had carried
on. He added: "I don't know of any other international agency that would
continue operations after losing 11 people."

II/III.

http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/1.610913
 LIVE UPDATES: Israel partially lifts fishing ban in Gaza as gesture amid
truce talks Egypt puts forth final Gaza truce proposal to break deadlock;
West likely to step up pressure for agreement if Cairo talks fail; Minister
Steinitz: Israel can't cede on Gaza demilitarization.  By Haaretz
<http://www.haaretz.com/misc/writers/haaretz-1.367584> |  Aug. 17, 2014 |
4:30 PM

The five-day extension of the Israel-Hamas cease-fire continued to hold on
Sunday as the Egyptian-mediated talks on a more permanent truce between the
sides seemed to make scarce progress.

The Israeli delegation to the negotiations returned to Cairo on Sunday
morning for what seemed to be a last-ditch effort to reach an agreement.
The talks were expected to continue through Monday night, when the
temporary cease-fire is scheduled to end.

Egypt has reportedly put forth a "final proposal
<http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.610848>" to break
the deadlock, but Palestinian sources said it's doubtful the sides will
accept its wording. Senior Israeli officials have said that should the
Egyptian mediation efforts fail, Western powers will likely try to push for
a UN Security Council
<http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.610872>
resolution that would call for an end to the fighting in the Gaza Strip.

Snipped.

III.

http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.610848
 Palestinians: Deal unlikely by Monday on Egypt's 'final proposal' for Gaza The
wording implies Israel's full recognition of the Hamas-Fatah unity
government, but Cairo is still expected to allow for changes.
 By Zvi Bar'el <http://www.haaretz.com/misc/writers/zvi-bar-el-1.693> |
Aug. 16, 2014 | 7:51 PM

Egypt has reportedly put forth a "final proposal" to break the deadlock
following the Gaza fighting
<http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/1.610840>, but Palestinian
sources say it's doubtful Israel and the Palestinians will accept the
wording in talks scheduled for the next two days.

Under Egypt's proposal, Israel and the Palestinians in Gaza commit not to
take any action against the other by "sea, air or land," while the
Palestinians promise not to dig tunnels into Israel, Egyptian newspaper
Al-Shorouk reported Friday.

It's a "final proposal," but sources say Cairo is still expected to accept
any agreement that does not harm Egypt's interests.

If the wording is accepted, Israel would be signing a document implying
full recognition of the Hamas-Fatah unity government. Jerusalem has refused
to do this, threatening sanctions on the Palestinian Authority instead.

Such an agreement would strengthen the principles forged by the Oslo Accords
<http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.610732> under
which Gaza and the West Bank are one political entity. The Palestinian
government could use these principles in a bid to win international
recognition of a Palestinian state, perhaps as a full member of the United
Nations.

"All crossings between Israel and Gaza would be opened in a manner that
would end the blockade and allow the free movement of goods and people, as
well as of materials for rebuilding Gaza," Al-Shorouk reported. The deal
would allow for "the transfer of goods between the West Bank and the Gaza
Strip in accordance with previous agreements between the Israeli
authorities and the Palestinians."

"All financial matters concerning Gaza" would be coordinated, the paper
added, referring to salaries for Hamas employees. It said that under the
agreement, the buffer zone at the Israel-Gaza border would be narrowed to
300 meters and, on November 18, to 100 meters. On January 1, PA forces
would deploy on the Gaza border.

Under the proposal, Israel would agree to gradually expand the Gaza fishing
zone to 12 nautical miles off the coast. It would also take part in
international efforts to rebuild Gaza.

The proposal, however, does not include details on key issues likely to be
discussed over the next two days. For example, in the agreement, Hamas
wants the right to build a seaport and an airport in Gaza. Hamas is worried
that if it does not secure this right now, Egypt will fail to force Israel
to concede in talks after a long-term cease-fire is set.

Another clause pertains to fund transfers; the main issue is the salaries
for 45,000 Hamas employees that were frozen under Israeli pressure. Other
issues include the way to transfer funds to rebuild Gaza, and whether Hamas
would be allowed to receive other donations and aid.

Also, would the PA be the destination for aid donations? How would Qatari
aid donations be sent? Who would supervise funding for construction
projects, and how?

Another issue is the terminology; the proposal does not mention Hamas and
Islamic Jihad but rather "Palestinian factions" and "the Palestinian
government." Both Hamas and Islamic Jihad want to be mentioned in the
agreement, though both Egypt and Israel are opposed.

Meanwhile, Israel needs to agree with the Palestinian government on what
kinds of goods and products would be allowed into Gaza, in what quantities,
and how they would be inspected. All this must be done in a way that would
"end the blockade," according to the Egyptian proposal.

Even this wording is controversial, as Israel claims there is no blockade
and has demanded that the agreement only mention the easing of restrictions
at border crossings. If Israel accepts the Egyptian proposal, it would
effectively acknowledge the blockade and agree to lift it.





-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to