[The report rather bluntly tells its readers that the emperor has just
no clothes on.]

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/27/world/asia/us-court-issues-summons-to-modi-in-lawsuit-over-2002-riots.html?_r=0


NEW DELHI -- A day before Prime Minister Narendra Modi was to arrive for a
much-touted five-day visit to the United States, a federal court in New
York issued a summons for Mr. Modi to respond to a lawsuit that accuses
him of human rights abuses in connection with religious riots in 2002
that tore through Gujarat, the state he then led.
The summons, which requires him to respond within 21 days, is not
likely to have any concrete effect on Mr. Modi's visit, which includes
high-profile events with President Obama, Vice President Joseph R.
Biden Jr. and numerous other political and corporate leaders. Courts
issue
such summonses when a complaint is filed, and the same lawyer has filed
similar lawsuits against Indian leaders in the past. A lawyer acting on
behalf of Mr. Modi and the Indian government will likely seek to have
the case dismissed, leaving a judge to decide the matter in several
months.Continue reading the main story Related Coverage
        *
Defying Expectations in India, Modi Begins Key Trip to U.S.SEPT. 25, 2014
        *
A Facebook Leader, Too: Narendra Modi, the Social Media
PoliticianSEPT. 25, 2014
Mr. Modi now enjoys "head of state immunity," a legal consideration
established by American and international law in order to allow world
leaders to work without interference, according to John F. Murphy, a
specialist in international human rights law from Villanova University,
who said he expected the court to dismiss the case. He said the State
Department may also issue a "suggestion of immunity" to the court, he
saidContinue reading the main story Multimedia Feature
Timeline of the Riots in Modi's Gujarat
Explore key developments in the 2002 riots in Gujarat
that shadowed Narendra Modi's ascent to the prime minister's office.

But it is a reminder that the United States government believed that Mr.
Modi had acted too slowly to stop the riots and that in 2005, it took
the rare step of putting him under a visa ban, ***which remains in
place*** [emphasis added]. (He was able to travel because he is now
eligible for a diplomatic visa, which is not affected.) As it became
clear that Mr. Modi was likely to
become prime minister, the United States has sought to set that history
aside, build a relationship with him and use the change of governments
to deepen both trade and defense cooperation with India.
Such lawsuits are not unprecedented. The same attorney, representing a
group called Sikhs for Justice, filed a lawsuit against Sonia Gandhi,
the
leader of the Indian National Congress party, alleging human rights
abuses said to have taken place during anti-Sikh riots in 1984. And a
summons was presented to her last year. Ms. Gandhi made a motion to
dismiss the claim, and that motion succeeded this year, The Times of
India reported.
The complaint, filed Thursday in the Southern District of New York, names
two Indians as plaintiffs, one identified only as Asif and the other as
Jane Doe, who, the complaint says, would not give her name out of
"well-founded fear of retaliation from the state and nonstate actors."
It says Mr. Modi and the state government were responsible for
extrajudicial killings, "organized violence, large-scale displacement
of members of the Muslim minority population, and the continuing
denial of justice."Photo Lawyers of the American
Justice Center, a nonprofit human rights organization acting on behalf
of the two Indian plaintiffs, spoke at a press conference in New York
on Friday. Credit Jewel Samad/Agence France-Presse -- Getty Images
***The lawyer who filed the complaint late on Thursday afternoon, Gurpatwant
Singh Pannum, said his clients had been "looking for this opportunity
for a long time." "It will be a big setback to Modi, because he was
involved in the genocidal attack on Muslims, and he got away with it,"
Mr. Pannum said. "I am
sure he thinks he is not going to be held accountable, but he is wrong
on this one."*** [Emphasis added.]
The Gujarat riots broke out after a train carrying mostly Hindus was
set on fire at the station in Godhra, a predominantly Muslim area,
killing 59
people. Blaming Muslims, mobs of Hindus rampaged, raping, looting and
killing in a spasm of violence that raged for days and persisted for
weeks. More than 1,200 people died, most of them Muslims.
Mr. Modi, who has close ties to right-wing Hindu organizations, was
accused by many in India of failing to stop the killing. However, no
Indian
court to date has found him responsible. Late last year, a court
rejected a petition seeking his prosecution in the case, a decision
that Mr. Modi hailed by writing, over Twitter, "Truth alone triumphs."




-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to