[Amid intensified exchange of fires between the two countries causing death and destruction on both the sides, Indian Prime Minister, a control freak, engaged in state electioneering, remains absent for Delhi and the the physically indisposed part-time Defence Minister somehow manages to issue a statement, at the end of long official silence, which in no way helps to resolve.A highly relevant read in the current context: < http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/10507342/India-Pakistan-nuclear-war-could-end-human-civilisation.html>. India and Pakistan, btw, both have around 100 nuclear warheads each, Pakistan understandably a few more, not that it really matters.]I/II.
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/pakistan-issues-nuclear-warning-to-india/1/395009.html Pakistan issues 'nuclear warning' to India Mail Today Bureau <http://indiatoday.intoday.in/author/Mail-Today-Bureau/1.html> | Mail Today <http://mailtoday.in> | New Delhi, October 10, 2014 | UPDATED 10:17 IST Pakistan Defence Minister Khawaja Asif. Pakistan on Thursday responded to India's warning against any "adventurism" on the borders in Jammu and Kashmir by saying it is capable of responding to Indian "aggression". "Pakistan has the ability to reply to Indian aggression. We do not want the situation on the borders of two nuclear neighbours to escalate into confrontation," Pakistan Defence Minister Khawaja Asif was quoted as saying by the media. "India must demonstrate caution and behave with responsibility," Asif said soon after his Indian counterpart Arun Jaitley warned that the cost of any adventurism by Pakistan on the borders of J&K would be "unaffordable". In Islamabad, the Federal Minister for States and Frontier Regions Lt Gen Abdul Qadir Baloch (Retd) said war is not the solution to any issue but "India should realise the fact that Pakistan is a nuclear power". He said Pakistan will continue to provide diplomatic, political and moral support to the Kashmiris. The Kashmir issue must be resolved according to UN resolutions and the wishes of the Kashmiri people, Baloch said. Foreign Office spokesperson Tasnim Aslam claimed India was to blame for the tensions on the border. "There is loss of life and property on the Pakistani side. The Pakistan Army is careful about not killing civilians," she told the media. Aslam contended that Pakistan "did not start any aggression" on the border but "we will take action to the fullest capacity". She further said that if India wanted, the two sides could talk and end the face off. In a related development, Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has convened a meeting of the National Security Committee on Friday to discuss the ceasefire violations. Earlier, Sartaj Aziz, Sharif's adviser on national security and foreign aff Read more at: http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/pakistan-issues-nuclear-warning-to-india/1/395009.html <http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/pakistan-issues-nuclear-warning-to-india/1/395009.html> II. http://time.com/3489191/military-action-diplomatic-threats-between-india-and-pakistan-in-kashmir/ Diplomatic Threats Between India and Pakistan in Kashmir - Rishi Iyengar <http://time.com/author/rishi-iyengar/> 6:17 AM ET <http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/priceless-civil-war-photo-slave-selina-gray-found-ebay-n223031?cid=par-time_20141010> Heavy shelling on the border over the past week has resulted in the deaths of at least eight Indian and nine Pakistani civilians, and thousands of villagers have been forced to flee their homes, according to Reuters*.* Tensions between India and Pakistan, who have fought three wars since the former was liberated and the latter created in 1947, have long convulsed South Asia. Border skirmishes between the nuclear-armed neighbors are relatively common in spite of a 2003 cease-fire agreement, but a sudden escalation of violence, stronger-than-usual posturing from both governments, and a departure from the usual methods of resolution are what sets the current conflict apart. "This conflict is different first of all in that it's prolonged and escalating, and secondly in that civilians are getting killed," says Radha Kumar, director general of the Delhi Policy Group. "It's never gone on for this long in the past 10 years." In August this year, there were cease-fire violations along the Indian-Pakistan border in Jammu, Indian-administered Kashmir's winter capital. Some civilians were killed and around 2,000 villagers fled their homes to ramshackle camps. Toward the end of the month, a flag meeting was held between the two forces and peace had prevailed, only to be shattered early this week. Pakistan's Defense Minister Khawaja Asif, in response to his Indian counterpart Arun Jaitley's warning that Indian forces would render any "adventurism" by Pakistan "unaffordable," said Islamabad has the ability to counter Indian aggression, followed by what could be perceived as a veiled threat. "We do not want the situation on the borders of two nuclear neighbors to escalate into confrontation," Asif said <http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/pakistan-issues-nuclear-warning-to-india/1/395009.html> on Thursday. The border standoff marks a downturn in India-Pakistan relations under new Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, whose invitation to Pakistan's embattled Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif for his inauguration ceremony in May sparked hopes of closer ties between the historic adversaries. The recent flash floods in Kashmir, which claimed hundreds of lives on both sides of the border, also saw exchanges of support and goodwill <http://time.com/3298814/kashmir-flooding-death-toll-rises-to-175-india-pm-modi-vows-180m-aid/> between the two leaders. Shuja Nawaz, director of the Washington, D.C.-based Atlantic Council's South Asia Center, says the current conflict is fairly typical in terms of the force used by either side and that civilians have been caught in the cross fire. However, "what makes it different is that you have two new governments and they are not following the standard operating procedures of resolving this at the military level," he tells TIME. *The Indian Expres*s reported <http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/india-talks-tough-warns-pak-of-effective-reply/> that India's Border Security Force has refused to engage in another flag meeting with Pakistani officials, instead asking the Ministries of Home and External Affairs to use diplomatic channels to resolve the conflict. "All our efforts to secure peace and tranquility on the Line of Control and the Work Boundary have elicited no cooperation from the Indian side," said a statement <http://www.mofa.gov.pk/pr-details.php?prID=2291> from Sartaj Aziz, National Security Adviser to Prime Minister Sharif. On Friday, the Pakistani leader called <http://www.dawn.com/news/1137064/nsc-meets-pm-nawaz-calls-upon-india-to-honour-ceasefire-agreement> on New Delhi to honor the pre-existing cease-fire agreement. Certainly, the steadily escalating conflict could not come at a more inopportune time for Sharif, as he faces widespread protests over allegations of corruption that have rocked his government for over two months amid rumors of a potential military coup. "He is trying to show that he and the military are on the same page," says Nawaz. However, analysts are split on the long-term consequences of the current escalation. According to a high-ranking Indian army official in Kashmir, who spoke to TIME in August on condition of anonymity, border confrontations with India will only increase as political instability deepens in Pakistan. "The fact of the matter is that Nawaz Sharif is not in charge, he's not even in charge of the capital," agrees former Indian diplomat G. Parthasarathy, who served as the high Commissioner to Pakistan between 1998 and 2000. "The [Pakistani] army is primed to see how the Modi government will react to this infiltration." But Hamayoun Khan, a lecturer in the Strategic Studies Department at Islamabad's National Defence University, says that Indian politics have just as much of a role to play in the conflict, pointing to upcoming state-assembly elections in Haryana and Uttar Pradesh. Khan says the border situation works to the advantage of nationalist parties like Modi's BJP, which is not shy about courting anti-Pakistan views to get votes. "Once they are over, once the rhetoric from the other side stops, this conflict will abate," he says. "They [India] will mellow down and so will we." Khan also disagrees with claims that the Pakistani Prime Minister has no control of his government. "The political situation that has been going on for over 60 days has put Nawaz Sharif under a lot of pressure, but he's bearing the burden of that pretty well and is pretty much in control," he says. The question of the possibility of rapprochement, meanwhile, is yet to be answered. "My fear is that the escalation ladder is very steep, particularly in Kashmir. You can go quickly from exchanging words to exchange fire," says Nawaz. "It's not in the best interests of either government to let this issue fester." *-- With reporting from Nilanjana Bhowmick / New Delhi* -- Peace Is Doable -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
