[The caption of the ToI news report is obviously misleading. In fact
its actual content clearly contradicts it: "Bombay High Court on
Monday directed the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation to evolve a
policy to provide water supply in some form to residents occupying
illegal hutments erected after Jan 1, 2000, the cut-off date for
structures regularised by the government. The court said water cannot
be denied to a citizen on the ground that he occupies an illegal
structure." (An illustrative example of editorial mischief?)

While the copy of the actual order remains to be accessed, ***the
essential gist is loud and clear: the Right to Water is an integral
part of the Right to Life as enshrined under the Article 21 of the
Indian Constitution***.
That's no doubt a landmark judgement.
One only hopes that the Supreme Court echoes the same view if this, or
any other similar case, comes up before it.

The PIL had *understandably* been filed by the Ghar Bachao Ghar Banao
Andolan, an affiliate of the NAPM.]

I/II.
Bombay high court asks BMC to supply water to even illegal slums

Tuesday, 16 December 2014 - 5:05am IST | Place: Mumbai | Agency: dna

Mustafa Plumber

Stating that authorities cannot differentiate between occupants of
illegal shanties and those living in authorized houses and providing
water supply is a fundamental right enshrined under Article 21, the
Bombay high court directed the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation to
provide water supply to all slum-dwellers, whether legal or illegal.

A division bench of justices Abhay Oka and AS Gadkari while directing
the corporation to formulate a policy to supply water to slums that
have come up post January 1, 2000 which are illegal said, "The supply
of water will not mean that the shanties are regularised."

The court said water supply may not be through providing individual
water connections but BMC can frame a policy and decide supply of
water, may be at a higher rate than it provides to the authorized
persons.

The court said, "The increase of illegal slums in Mumbai cannot be
attributed to one reason, it is a complicated issue. However, the
failure of authorities to take action and allowing illegal slums to
come up, state government regularization of slums up to January 1,
2000 which gives hope to them and may be the reason why people occupy
slums."

The bench also considered the information placed before it, that
around 81 police inspectors and 4,425 police constables live in slums,
staff of other public sector undertakings also reside in slums. It
said, "If the civic body provides water in buildings not having
occupation certificates, then why can't it do the same to slums."

The court passed the order while hearing a public interest litigation
filed by city-based NGO Pani Haq Samiti. The NGO has challenged the
decision of the BMC which was implemented on the basis of a government
resolution issued on March 4, 1996. On that basis the corporation has
completely stopped water supply to people residing in slums which have
come up after January 1, 2000.

Mihir Desai, advocate for the NGO, said the Constitution of India
provides for right to life to all. "Right to water is also a part of
right to life. No one can survive without drinking water," he had
argued.

The BMC and the state government had opposed the petition stating that
it would encourage illegal slums and the decision of not supplying
water is not unconstitutional. It was also said slums are located on
hillocks and other dangerous places, thus supply of water would not be
possible. The court though refused to accept the contentions and
directed the Corporation to file the compliance report on the
directions given by March 2, 2015.

4,200 million litres - The daily demand for water
3,750 million litres - The quantity of water BMC supplies daily

II.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/Provide-water-supply-to-legalised-slums-Bombay-HC-to-BMC/articleshow/45524468.cms

Provide water supply to legalised slums: Bombay HC to BMC
TNN | Dec 15, 2014, 07.16 PM IST

MUMBAI: Bombay High Court on Monday directed the Brihanmumbai
Municipal Corporation to evolve a policy to provide water supply in
some form to residents occupying illegal hutments erected after Jan 1,
2000, the cut-off date for structures regularised by the government.
The court said water cannot be denied to a citizen on the ground that
he occupies an illegal structure.

A division bench of Justice Abhay Oka and Justice A S Gadkari granted
interim relief in a public interest litigation filed by Pani Haq
Samiti. The NGO contended that providing water is integral to Article
21 ( Right to Life) of the Constitution and that no State agency or
instrumentality can deny water supply to a citizen who occupies
illegal hutments after January 1, 2000. The judges said Right to Life
includes right to food and water and State cannnot deny water to a
citizen on the ground that he is residing in a structure illegally.
They rapped "all concerned authorities" for their "failure" to prevent
illegal hutments in the city and to take action against them.

The bench said even if water is provided to a person who occupies an
illegal structure, it does not create equity in his favour and does
not affect the illegal nature of the structure. The judges noted that
even electricity is being provided to illegal slums. They observed
that a person staying in an illegal structure cannot claim right on
par with a law-abiding citzien who is occupying authorised premises.
BMC is directed to provide water on payment of charge at higher rates
than those given to authorised premises.

The judges have directed BMC to formulate a policy as expeditiously as
possible and by end of February 2015. They made it clear that not
withstanding their order, the BMC shall be under an obligation to take
action including for demolition of slums not protected after January
1, 2000. BMC is also directed to take action against officers
designated with the task of ensuring that slums do not come up
following an amendment in the BMC Act. Besides a compliance report,
the civic body has to file an affidavit stating the manner in which it
is going to prevent construction of such illegal slums and the steps
it will take for demolishing them.
-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to