[The following was the forwarding note to my mail, 'On AAP's Operation
Vistar: The Tussle Within', posted on the last Feb. 15:

This was the forwarding note (in full) to a mail posted on Feb. 12 last:

The news story reproduced at sl. no. II below appears to contradict
the speculations, elsewhere, that the AAP would immediately launch an
Operation Vistar on the back of its dizzying success in Delhi. The
story, however, does not name its source.

In fact the decision to fight the last parliamentary election
virtually all over the country is generally attributed to Yogendra
Yadav. Understandably, Arvind Kejriwal was not in favour.
This time the AAP already announced its decision not to fight the
municipal polls in Punjab. And, there is no shift post the Delhi poll
outcome.

(See: <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/greenyouth/GizibPRlVLI>.)

Compare the above quote with the following:

Now, Kejriwal has made his position amply clear in his Ramlila Maidan
speech yesterday:
While indirectly speaking to a few senior leaders, Kejriwal said:
***"During the past few days,
I have been watching people from my party say on TV that we will fight
elections here and
there. We will contest elections in five states, ten states, etc. I
can see some amount of arrogance in these statements. I do not think
this is right."*** [Emphasis added.]

Kejriwal elaborated that now ***the AAP would focus only on Delhi's
development for the next five years*** [emphasis added].

(Source: 
<file:///D:/Documents%20and%20Settings/user/My%20Documents/Downloads/epaper-Lucknow-English-Edition_15-02-2015.pdf>.)

That does not of course mean that the tension stands finally resolved.
There will be pressures from state units.
And, even Yogendra Yadav does not appear to have finally given up.
But, to be sure, for now, Kejriwal will prevail.

(End of the Note, dated Feb. 15. Source:
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/india-unity/conversations/topics/55515>.)

Reproduced below at sl. no. I & II are two reports, which are
self-explanatory and complementary to each other.]

I/II.
EMERGING FAULTLINES

Full Text: Admiral Ramdas writes to AAP leaders urging them to be
'together and united'

But there seem to be few takers for the advice as rumours circulate
that Yogendra Yadav and Prashant Bhushan might be edged out of the
party's political advisory committee.
Scroll Staff
Yesterday ยท 02:01 pm

Political parties in India take years to gain traction and win
elections, unless they are headed by film stars. There isn't a matinee
idol at the helm of the Aam Aadmi Party, and yet just in a little over
two years of its formation, it has wrested an astounding, nearly
unprecedented victory in all-time Indian electoral history by winning
67 out of 70 seats in the 2015 Delhi assembly polls.

Much of the credit goes to the party's extraordinary ability to
galvanise volunteers at the grassroots through its promise of
cleansing Indian politics. As a party that grew out of the
anti-corruption movement, it has been driven by the idealism of its
faceless supporters. But sentiment alone couldn't have been shaped
into electoral success in the absence of a powerful leader, who in the
case of AAP, is undoubtedly the charismatic crusader and founder of
the party, Arvind Kejriwal, now the chief minister of Delhi. The party
swept Delhi on the back of the slogan "Paanch Saal Kejriwal" (Five
years for Kejriwal).

Kejriwal is now no less of a crowd puller than a film star. The day he
took oath as chief minister, Ramlila Maidan, three times as large as a
football field, was packed with tens of thousands of supporters,
wearing caps and mufflers imprinted with his image.

The near identification of AAP with Kejriwal has been disquieting for
other leaders in the party. Senior lawyer Prashant Bhushan and
academic Yogendra Yadav, in particular, are believed to view
critically the personality cult forming around Kejriwal, as well as
the concentration of power. In January, both voiced their
disagreements with the party's selection of some candidates in the
Delhi polls, prompting Admiral (retired) Laxminarayan Ramdas, the
party's Ombudsman or Lokpal, to hold an enquiry.

On Thursday, the party's national executive committee met amidst
rumours of deepening strife within the party. Ramdas, who could not
attend the meeting, sent a strongly worded letter to the members of
the NEC and the political advisory committee. In the letter, which
Scroll reproduces in full length below, he said, "During the past six
to eight months there has been an abject breakdown in communications
and mutual trust amongst the topmost leadership of the party. This has
in my view led to the growth of two camps within the party and loose
talk about conspiracies. This is unacceptable and shows that we are no
different from any of the parties whom we criticise so vocally."
Ramdas urged the leaders "to anticipate, head off, and resolve,
debilitating disagreements and conflicts".

But the attempt to resolve the disagreements appears to have only
fuelled more conflict. In the meeting, taking off from Ramdas' letter,
Bhushan circulated an individual note, as well as a jointly authored
note with Yogendra Yadav, outlining an action plan. According to some
media reports, he also proposed that Yadav be made the convenor of
AAP, a position currently held by Kejriwal. This appears to have not
gone down well with others in the party, and there are rumours that
the PAC itself might be reconstituted and Yadav and Bhushan might be
edged out.

On Saturday, Yadav made light of the rumours in an interview with ANI.
He said he saw AAP as a long-term player, and he was willing to take
on any responsibility the party entrusted him with.

Speaking with Scroll on Sunday, Bhushan denied that he had proposed
Yadav's name for the convenor's post. But he confirmed that he had
circulated a note jointly authored with Yadav on the institutional
reforms needed in the party. He also circulated a separate note
individually which explained why the reforms were needed. "The reforms
are needed to make the party more transparent and its functioning more
credible," he said. He refused to divulge the details of the
recommendations he made. When asked if his future involvement in the
party was predicated in the response that his proposal gets, he said,
"We'll see what will happen."

"I am in the party because of the ideals and principles on which it
was founded," he said. "I will try to ensure that it remains true to
those ideals."

***Here is the full text of the letter written by Ramdas.*** [Emphasis added.]

Dear Friends,

Please find enclosed a note that we have prepared for the PAC and NEC
members as we will not be able to attend the meeting on Feb 26th at
Delhi.This note contains some essential issues which I hope will be
discussed during the meeting as part of the Way Ahead item for the
party included in the Agenda. Wishing you a successful and
constructive day together.

Admiral and Lalita Ramdas

NOTE TO THE PAC AND NEC FROM ADMIRAL RAMDAS

I am writing this note to members of the PAC and NEC today, to share
with you some of my concerns and related issues regarding the
governance of the party. I would have presented this in person on 26
Feb, but I am not too well and so this note.

As Lokpal of the party, I have often been called to do damage control
to avoid the AAP ship from capsizing! Today I want to ensure that this
ship will stay afloat to make many voyages in the years to come.

A Brief Recap

In end December 2014, there was a crisis situation brought about by
Shri Prashant Bhushan's unhappiness with candidate selection
procedures and decision making processes. If not addressed, he said,
he would be forced to resign from the party and go public. To contain
this, a special meeting was called in Delhi on Jan 3-4, 2015 at which
a decision was taken to refer the issue to the Lokpal, assisted by a
specially selected team. Thanks to preliminary investigative work by
this fine young team from across the country, I could finalise my own
findings in time for the candidates to file their nomination papers by
Jan 21st 2015.

This was not the first time that I had to use my good offices to
defuse a crisis situation; the previous one being immediately after
the explosive Sangrur NEC, [August 2014}. In response to my letter,
members of the PAC and special invitees, agreed to take a pledge not
to go to public and to stick together and show a united face until the
Delhi elections were over.

In early January once again I had occasion to address a note to key
players and those attending the Delhi meeting, urging them that this
was not the time to allow inner differences to surface in the public
domain. Once again I assured them, especially those who raised the
complaints, that we would certainly address the several concerns being
raised with respect to candidate selection procedures, decision making
, committee meetings, financial transparency, ethics, after our
government took charge in Delhi.

Had the inner conflicts exploded in front of a hostile media, there is
no telling what the impact could have been on the unprecedented
election results.

I had hoped that the thumping results of the recent elections would
have restored a positive energy in the party and that many of the
mutual suspicions would have been set to rest, given that all of you
had pulled together, despite differences, to deliver a stunning
victory. Alas, this was not to be, and most recently while in Delhi
during the results and swearing in, I also spent many hours in many
difficult conversations where many of the old ghosts were constantly
raising their heads.

As Lokpal, I have therefore gone beyond giving a narrow judicial
verdict on the ethics and standards pertaining to candidate selection
alone. Rightly or wrongly, I have taken upon myself an expanded role,
namely, acting as an elder statesman to ensure that the party remained
united throughout this period. I did not join the party only to
preside over a potential split down the middle. My paramount interest
is to nurture AAP and its potential as the only political entity in
the country today which can change the way politics is practiced. I
see my role as one who will unambiguously point out that mistakes and
compromises have been evident in many areas -and from all sectors -
with no single person exempt from some element of responsibility for
the present impasse.

THE WAY FORWARD

I would urge all in the NEC to play the role of an objective, wise and
statesman like  body whose role will be to play with a straight bat;
be impartial, heal and cement the wounds and fissures. I hope that the
members of the NEC will not take sides, but be able to build
mechanisms and find people who are acceptable to both parties to find
solutions. The press and media and our opponents are waiting like
vultures to rip AAP apart at the slightest hint of rifts and
dissension within. We need therefore to address the points detailed
below.

1. Our spectacular performance in the recently concluded Delhi
elections implies that we have to provide good governance in Delhi. It
has raised hopes and expectations to a new level among the people of
Delhi. This means that we will have to perform and make sure that we
do not fail them.

2. National Convenorship  - To discuss and arrive at creative and
visionary decisions on redefining the role of the National Convenor of
AAP. Can the Chief Minister of a state and the National Convenor if
he/she be the same person be in a position to discharge both the the
duties efficiently?  Do we need co-convenors? What kind of profile are
we looking for? Whether we like it or not, today we are a national
party; and we can no longer keep our vision limited to Delhi or some
region within the capital. The Delhi results have also impacted at the
national level; and expectations have been aroused amongst all AAM
AADMI supporters outside the capital and across India.  We need to
recognise this and programme ourselves accordingly.

3. Dissent and Democracy - There has been criticism within the party
regarding decision making and inner party democracy. This needs to be
further analysed by an independent, group who should carry out an
internal audit and make suitable recommendations in keeping with the
Constitution and the high standards of probity and ethics that we have
charted for ourselves. Most importantly let us not rush this; these
processes take time; and as we have done with Mission Vistaar, so must
it be with the next round of change and expansion.

4. Volunteers and management of volunteers  - Volunteers are our life
line. We neglected and took for granted our volunteers and their
commitment, especially after the national elections in 2014. This may
well have been, one of the contributory factors for the emergence of
AVAM.  We need to learn the right lessons from this experience and put
in place robust mechanisms and people to handle this resource.

5. Conspiracy Theories , Trust Deficit and Communication Failures  -
During the past six to eight months there has been an abject breakdown
in communications and mutual trust amongst the topmost leadership of
the party. This has in my view led to the growth of two camps within
the party and loose talk about conspiracies. This is unacceptable and
shows that we are no different from any of the parties whom we
criticise so vocally. I sincerely urge the entire leadership of this
party, especially now that we are also running a government in the
capital city, to stop listening to rumours and to discourage
colleagues no matter how close, who continually bring negative
feedback about each other.

My comment comes from, over forty four years of experience in the
Indian Navy, where lending an ear to a single mischief maker can
create havoc within the organisation. There is no substitute for one
on one dialogue to understand each other better knowing that we may
also disagree. Managing dissent is both an art and an imperative.We
have managed to keep this under some form of control and avoided an
implosion within, until now. This has only been possible because of
the untiring efforts by many well wishers from the party, people with
extraordinary loyalty and integrity spread across the country.

6. RECONSTITUTION OF PAC AND NEC

We need an open discussion on how, when and whether bodies like the
NEC, PAC, and even the National Council might need to be
reconstituted to better represent region/geography, gender, ethnic and
other forms of diversity, as well as to reflect the current
developments in the party.

I was both surprised and disappointed at the manner in which decisions
were taken at the Delhi NEC meeting in June 2014, be it on expanding
the PAC or inviting new members onto the NEC.  Such important
decisions need far more rigorous methods and processes, and not the
hurried, almost ad hoc tabling of names and a show of hands or voice
votes to take decisions. If a system of setting up a search committee
with agreed parameters and criteria can be set up for both these
important core committee, it would go a long way in streamlining our
procedures. For both bodies, we also need well thought through
criteria of skills, experience, and qualifications, as also better
representation on the key questions regarding gender, region and other
diversity related  issues mentioned above.

7. SYSTEMS, DISCIPLINE, CONFIDENTIALITY AND ETHICS.

I have spent my life in a disciplined service, where secrecy and
maintenance of confidentiality is  often a matter of life and death.
Frankly I have been aghast at the way in which decisions taken in our
meetings are leaked within minutes; where conversations are recorded
and uploaded, and sting operations conducted with little or no
accountability.

Every email and letter I have sent out seems to become common
knowledge and often has found its way to the media! All of us who were
at Ram Lila Maidan on Feb 14th heard each Minister take a separate
oath of secrecy as he took office before the Governor in public view.
This is not merely a formality but a sacred duty. We need to discuss
whether some form of inner party discipline is required within our own
core committees?!

I daresay we could argue that a political party is not the same as a
defence force. And yet we must all observe certain agreed upon rules
and regulations, put in place systems to which we must all pledge
allegiance and slowly but surely evolve into something of which we can
truly be proud and where taking shortcuts even for winnability and
exigencies will slowly be an exception and not the rule. We could then
genuinely claim to be setting high benchmarks for the country in the
future.

6. GENDER JUSTICE AND WOMEN IN AAP

Finally, last but not least, we need to make much efforts in the
direction of becoming a genuinely Gender sensitive party which will do
far more than pay lip service to women's empowerment and ensure that
we work to improve women's visibility and participation at all levels.
I personally find it difficult to defend AAP against accusations of
being mainly a Boys Club especially when we were not able to have even
one women in our team of Ministers! Women Empowerment and Justice has
to go deeper and farther than mere security alone the Delhi Dialogue
on Women was a good start. I hope that a group like AAP Shakti, who
have been working systematically on a range of practical and
supportive measures will be  treated as an important resource to help
us move in the direction of genuine empowerment of women.

7. POLICY, THINK TANKS, AND LONG TERM PERSPECTIVES

The crazy period of headlong rush from one election to another is
mercifully over for a while. This is a time for us to consolidate to
return to our initial and path breaking dialogues on Policy, on the
huge range of issues that confront our country. We need to have
special groups that will create a pool of ideas, of projects and a
road map both for Delhi and the country as a whole.

8. CONFLICT RESOLUTION, OMBUDS-PERSONS, SENIORS ADVISORY COUNCILS

The sheer time and energies that have been consumed in the past year
and more in addressing various levels and kinds of conflicts and
problems shows us that this is an area which will continue to exist
and will continue to demand a council of elders, of people who can
give of their time and wisdom, to anticipate, head off, and resolve,
debilitating disagreements and conflicts.

CONCLUSION

Finally by way of conclusion, I wish to say that we are lucky to get
this time to put our own house in order. This is not the time to go
back in history or take any hasty decisions. We need to be statesmen
like and work our way through this quagmire deftly and cautiously.
After all just two years and a few months have lapsed since we formed
a party. We are not magicians and the environment we have had to face
is not one of our making!

We must accept with all humility, that we are all on the learning
curve. It is important that we give out clear signals that all senior
members of the party, primarily the PAC, are together and united. Let
us be positive and not resort to any form of hasty action against our
members. The leadership will have to carry the team together. Everyone
has worked very hard to arrive where we are today and the country
expects a lot from the party and we should not disappoint them and
miss this golden opportunity.

Mrs Ramdas and I have also not spared ourselves over these months to
keep the AAPship on an even keel. She joins me in wishing all of you
Good

Luck.

Warm regards

L. Ramdas.

II.
http://inagist.com/all/572064709672767489/

Hailing AAP's democracy, Yogendra Yadav defends Admiral Ramdas's
criticism dnai.in/cAYe

Snipped

-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to