[Just to recollect, had posted a mail, 'Height of Absurd Villainous Stupidity: 'RSS' Lawyers Move Court to Claim Taj Mahal as a Shiva Temple: Let Them Cite a Single Shiva (or any other Hindu) Temple in North India (or anywhere else in World) with Hemispherical Dome at Top and Surrounded by Tall, Slender Minarets, leave aside Other Features', only day before yesterday: <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/india-unity/conversations/messages/55835>.]
I/IV. http://www.indiatimes.com/news/india/court-says-taj-mahal-is-not-a-hindu-temple-but-these-lawyers-just-wont-budge-231367.html Court Says Taj Mahal Is Not A Hindu Temple, But These Lawyers Just Won't Budge PTI March 27, 2015 A civil court in Agra has dismissed a lawsuit claiming that Taj Mahal was a Hindu temple and its ownership should be transferred to the community. The petition was filed in the civil court on Wednesday by Hari Shankar Jain and five others over ownership of the 17th century Mughal monument. Lawyer for the plaintiffs Rajesh Kulshreshtra told PTI that the court refused to entertain the petition and dismissed it on Thursday. "We will now approach the Allahabad High Court and we are confident our PIL will be admitted on merit there," Kulshreshtra said. He claimed that there was substantial evidence to prove that the Taj Mahal was a Shiva temple, dedicated to Lord Agreshwar Mahadev. The suit demanded that the monument's ownership be transferred to Hindus and Muslims be restrained from offering prayers there. II/IV. http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/plea-to-declare-taj-a-shiva-temple-dismissed/article7039804.ece Updated: March 27, 2015 15:42 IST Plea to declare Taj a Shiva temple dismissed PTI Taj Mahal at Agra. File photo: R. V. Moorthy Six lawyers in Agra had moved the Civil Court with the prayer to declare the 7th century Mughal monument.a Hindu temple A civil court has dismissed a lawsuit claiming that Taj Mahal was a Hindu temple and its ownership should be transferred to the community. The petition was filed in the civil court on Wednesday by Hari Shankar Jain and five others over ownership of the 17th century Mughal monument. Lawyer for the plaintiffs Rajesh Kulshreshtra said that the court refused to entertain the petition and dismissed it on Thursday. "We will now approach the Allahabad High Court and we are confident our PIL will be admitted on merit there," Kulshreshtra said. He claimed that there was substantial evidence to prove that the Taj Mahal was a Shiva temple, dedicated to Lord Agreshwar Mahadev. The suit demanded that the monument's ownership be transferred to Hindus and Muslims be restrained from offering prayers there. II/IV. http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/civil-court-dismisses-plea-claiming-taj-mahal-ownership-for-hindus/articleshow/46714565.cms Civil Court dismisses plea claiming Taj Mahal ownership for Hindus By PTI | 27 Mar, 2015, 03.32PM IST AGRA: A civil court has dismissed a lawsuit claiming that Taj Mahal was a Hindu temple and its ownership should be transferred to the community. The petition was filed in the civil court on Wednesday by Hari Shankar Jain and five others over ownership of the 17th century Mughal monument. Lawyer for the plaintiffs Rajesh Kulshreshtra told PTI that the court refused to entertain the petition and dismissed it yesterday. "We will now approach the Allahabad High Court and we are confident our PIL will be admitted on merit there," Kulshreshtra said. He claimed that there was substantial evidence to prove that the Taj Mahal was a Shiva temple, dedicated to Lord Agreshwar Mahadev. The suit demanded that the monument's ownership be transferred to Hindus and Muslims be restrained from offering prayers there. IV. http://zeenews.india.com/news/india/court-dismisses-plea-claiming-taj-mahal-ownership-for-hindus_1568761.html Court dismisses plea claiming Taj Mahal ownership for Hindus Last Updated: Friday, March 27, 2015 - 15:55 Agra: A civil court has dismissed a lawsuit claiming that Taj Mahal was a Hindu temple and its ownership should be transferred to the community. The petition was filed in the civil court on Wednesday by Hari Shankar Jain and five others over ownership of the 17th century Mughal monument. Lawyer for the plaintiffs Rajesh Kulshreshtra told PTI that the court refused to entertain the petition and dismissed it yesterday. "We will now approach the Allahabad High Court and we are confident our PIL will be admitted on merit there," Kulshreshtra said. He claimed that there was substantial evidence to prove that the Taj Mahal was a Shiva temple, dedicated to Lord Agreshwar Mahadev. The suit demanded that the monument's ownership be transferred to Hindus and Muslims be restrained from offering prayers there. PTI -- Peace Is Doable -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
