I/II.
http://www.thecitizen.in/NewsDetail.aspx?Id=3375&THE%2FINCREDIBLE%2FRISE%2FAND%2FRISE%2FOF%2FGAUTAM%2FADANI

The Incredible Rise and Rise of Gautam Adani: Part One
PARANJOY GUHA THAKURTA

A laugh between friends

NEW DELHI: Has India’s largest bank, the government-controlled State
Bank of India (SBI) decided to scrap a memorandum of understanding
(MoU) it entered into with one of India’s largest corporate
conglomerates led by Gautam Adani? The MoU was to advance a
first-of-its-kind loan of US$ one billion or ₹6,200 crore for a
controversial coal mining project in Queensland, Australia.

One newspaper report suggested that there would be a 'quiet and
natural death' of the loan agreement between the SBI and the Adani
group. But nothing is official yet.

If indeed the MoU is scrapped, it would signify a dramatic shift in
the position of India's biggest lender. On 13 March, SBI Chairperson
Arundhati Bhattacharya had dubbed media speculation about the
possibility of scrapping the MoU between the bank and the Adani group
as "all gossip".

If, and when, the SBI decides not to extend a loan for a part of a
major project -- that entails developing a coal mine, building a
railway line and revamping a port at a cost of around $10 billion or
₹62,000 crore in the north-eastern part of Australia -- India's
biggest bank will join a long list of international banks and
financial institutions that have so far categorically expressed their
unwillingness to finance the controversial project which is being
opposed by local communities and environmental activists.

The list of banks mentioned include BNP Paribas SA, Credit Agricole
SA, Societe Generale SA, Barclays Plc., Citigroup Inc., Deutsche Bank
AG, Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., HSBC Holding Plc., J P Morgan Chase &
Co., Morgan Stanley and Royal Bank of Scotland Plc. Whereas most of
these banks have decided not to be associated with the project on
ecological considerations -- it is contended that the project may
adversely impact the ecosystem of the Great Barrier Reef, one of the
seven wonders of the natural world -- the economic viability of the
project has also been questioned.

Should the SBI decide not to advance the biggest loan of its kind to
an Indian corporate group for an overseas project, the Adani group is
exploring other options. Media reports suggest the group is in talks
with the Exim Bank of Korea and some Chinese banks to raise over $one
billion to part-finance the building of the coal mining part of the
project on which an estimated $7.8 billion would be spent.

However, the more intriguing story is how Gautam Adani, the business
magnate who is perceived to be Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s
blue-eyed boy, could have dared to think as big as he does. He clearly
has ambitions to become not just one of this country's biggest tycoons
but one who hopes to lead India's biggest multinational conglomerate.

Gautam Adani has indeed come a long way from the time he dropped out
of college. He turns 53 this June. A quarter century ago, he had given
up studying in a morning college in Mumbai to start trading in
diamonds and plastics. After a successful stint as a diamond trader,
he moved to Gujarat's capital Ahmedabad in 1981 to help start a
cousin’s firm to trade in poly-vinyl chloride (PVC).

He set up a commodities trading venture in 1988 under Adani Exports,
and was successful enough to start hitting the headlines of business
papers in his home state. By the mid-1990s, Adani's business successes
starting attracting attention, including attention of the unwelcome
kind.

Eighteen years ago, in 1997, he was allegedly abducted by underworld
don Fazl-Ur-Rehman alias 'Fazlu Rehman', who is currently lodged in
Tihar Central Jail in New Delhi. Rehman and two of his accomplices
were accused of kidnapping Adani in a car from the outskirts of
Ahmedabad and subsequently released him after extorting ₹15 crore as
ransom. Those accused were reportedly acting on behalf of Dubai-based
gangster Irfan Goga.

Rehman has been named as the prime accused in several other high
profile extortion cases in Ahmedabad, Delhi and Mumbai, most of them
involving businessmen and industrialists. However, he remained out of
the clutches of the law after he shifted his base to Dubai. In August
2006, the Delhi police arrested him from Bihar at a place near the
India-Nepal border.

Gautam Adani currently heads a group of companies which comprises
India's biggest private operator of ports as well as the country's
largest private producer of electricity. In addition, the Adani group
has substantial interests in a variety of sectors: coal mining, oil
and gas exploration, gas distribution, transmission and distribution
of electricity, civil construction and infrastructure, multi-modal
logistics, international trade, education, real estate, edible oils
and food storage.

His companies currently trade in over 30 commodities with at least 28
countries. Over the period of a year till September 2014, the market
capitalisation of companies in the Adani group (or the prevailing
market price of the companies' equity shares multiplied by the total
number of shares) zoomed by more than 250 per cent! The
Ahmedabad-based businessman had a personal wealth of $ 7.1 billion (or
₹ 43,000 crore) at the end of September 2014, according to Forbes
magazine.

More than his undoubtedly impressive record of corporate conquests,
what has attracted considerable attention to Adani is his proximity to
Prime Minister Modi. This is hardly surprising. One needs to just
search the internet to find a picture that told the proverbial story
of a thousand words, a photograph that was splashed across India's
newspapers and websites on 22 May 2014.

The photo depicted Modi leaving Ahmedabad, the biggest city in
Gujarat, the state where he had been Chief Minister for nearly 12
years from October 2001 onwards, to travel to New Delhi to be sworn in
as Prime Minister of India. His stretched hand waving (presumably to
an adulatory home crowd), the colourful logo of the private aircraft
he was about to enter was clearly visible in the picture. It said:
Adani.

Gautam Adani's impressive rise as a businessperson has largely
coincided with Modi's stewardship of the state. This close
relationship was forged on a matrix of mutual interests which also
became a template of sorts for Modi’s vision for economic development
through an industry-led network of corporate-government interactions,
often called the "Gujarat model".

Over a period of 12 months from the time Modi was officially declared
the Bharatiya Janata Party's prime ministerial candidate on 13
September 2013, the market price of the share of an important group
company, Adani Enterprises, jumped from ₹5 to ₹786 or a whopping 265
per cent. Over a decade, the Adani group's turnover rose more
twenty-fold from ₹3,741 crore in 2001-02 to ₹75,659 crore in 2013-14.

This special Modi-Adani bond, chronologically charted , can be traced
back to 2002, the year Gujarat witnessed gruesome communal riots
between Hindus and Muslims. After certain businesspersons affiliated
to the apex chamber of commerce, the Confederation of Indian Industry
(CII), criticised Modi, a group of local businessmen led by Adani,
established a rival organisation called the Resurgent Group of Gujarat
(RGG) and threatened to leave the CII.

Adani pledged a sum of ₹15,000 crore for the first Vibrant Gujarat
summit (that took place in September-October 2003). He thereafter
cemented his association with Modi and became his ardent supporter,
lobbying for him in India and abroad.

In March 2013, after it became evident that Modi would be
unceremoniously dropped as a keynote speaker at a public function
organised at the Wharton School of Business in the United States
because of pressure from academics and students opposed to him, the
Adani group, one of the main sponsors of the event, withdrew its
financial support.

Critics of Modi allege that the cosy relationship between him and
Adani has enabled the latter to bag many lucrative deals in Gujarat.
When Modi was Chief Minister of Gujarat, large tracts of land were
given to his group at throwaway prices (ranging between ₹one to ₹16
per square metre) to set up India's biggest private port at Mundra on
the west coast in violation of environmental norms. Media reports that
have not been challenged point out that the Adani group won
30-year-leases for getting 7,350 hectares around Mundra for as little
as one cent a square metre and then re-let the land for $11 per sq.m.

The area also hosts one of India's biggest special economic zones
(SEZs) which is supported by the country's largest private railway
network. The land in the area was re-sold and/or leased by the Adani
group to various other companies, including public sector undertakings
like the Indian Oil Corporation (IOC), the Oil and Natural Gas
Corporation (ONGC) at rates in excess of ₹600 per sq metre. The group
was also exempt from payment of all stamp duties for the thousands of
acres of land it acquired for the SEZ.

Despite Adani's political connections, law enforcing agencies have
periodically sought to initiate action against companies in his group.
On 2 January 2014, the Economic Times reported that the Mumbai unit of
Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) had started an inquiry into
allegations of "over-valuation" of capital equipment that had been
imported for power projects.

The agency, part of the Ministry of Finance, is reportedly
"investigating gross overvaluation of import of equipment and
machinery by various entities of (the) Adani Group from a (United Arab
Emirates) UAE-based intermediary", according to an internal report of
the DRI that had been prepared in December 2013. This report alleges
that "an amount of ₹2,322.75 crore has been siphoned off abroad by
(the) Adani Group by resorting to over-valuation of imports in the
name of various group firms " .

The Press Trust of India (PTI) reported on 18 May 2014 (two days after
the results of the general elections were announced) that the DRI had
slapped a ₹5,500-crore show-cause notice on companies in Adani group
for alleged over-valuation of imports of capital equipment. The
show-cause notice was issued against three companies in the group:
Adani Power Maharashtra, Adani Power Rajasthan and Maharashtra Eastern
Grid Power Transmission Company, besides a contracting firm.

On the day the results were declared and it became known that the BJP
led by Modi had won a majority of seats in the Lok Sabha, on 16 May
2014, Gautam Adani had proudly announced that a company in his group,
Adani Ports, had agreed to acquire a port at Dhamra, Odisha, for the
equivalent of $0.92 billion or nearly ₹6,000 crore.

The construction of the port at Dhamra (which was earlier being built
by a joint venture between the Tata group and Larsen & Toubro) has
been opposed by environmental activists, including those affiliated to
Greenpeace, for threatening mangroves and the nesting ground of
hundreds of thousands of endangered turtles.

The Adani group had earlier been censured for paying bribes to gain
undue favours for its iron ore mining interests in Karnataka. In July
2011, in his report exposing illegal mining in Karnataka, the then Lok
Ayukta (or people's ombudsman) of the state Justice Santosh Hegde had
indicted Adani Enterprises for having paid "bribes for getting undue
favour for illegal exports:.

Adani Enterprises has port facilities in Karnataka which, the report
alleged, were used for illegally exporting iron ore. The Lok Ayukta
accused the company of forging permits to transport iron ore. On 30
July 2011, following media reports about the Lok Ayukta’s adverse
remarks, the market capitalisation of Adani Enterprises fell by over a
fifth or ₹22,177 crore in two and half hours of trading. That day, the
prices of the shares of two other group companies, Adani Power and
Mundra Port & Special Economic Zone (MPSEZ), fell by over 11 per cent
and over 7 per cent respectively.

On 24 November 2014, E.A.S. Sarma, who retired from the Indian
Administrative Service as Secretary, Economic Affairs, in the Ministry
of Finance and who is now a noted anti-corruption crusader, wrote a
letter to the heads of various central investigating agencies
(including the Central Vigilance Commission, the DRI and the Central
Bureau of Investigation) asking them to investigate allegations of
money laundering against companies in the Adani group.

Sarma pointed out that since the Supreme Court appointed Special
Investigation Team on black money is investigating the allegations,
the SBI should not have signed the MoU to advance a loan of $one
billion loan to the group. He pointed towards several newspaper
reports in India and Australia that had raised questions about the
ownership structure of Adani group companies (that are meant to
execute the project) and their links to offshore accounts.

Earlier, on 30 March 2012, a report of the Comptroller and Auditor
General (CAG) of India was tabled in the Gujarat legislative assembly
that pulled up a state government company, Gujarat State Petroleum
Corporation (GSPC), for extending undue benefits to Adani Energy. The
report said that poor management by GSPC had led to a loss of over
₹5,000 crore to the exchequer.

The Gujarat government company had bought natural gas from the open
market and sold it to the Adani company at a price lower than the
purchase price. The CAG estimated that Adani Energy had received
"undue benefit" to the tune of ₹70.54 crore in the process.

Then, on 26 July 2014, the CAG again slammed the Gujarat government in
five different reports for severe mismanagement of the state's
financial resources. The reports highlighted financial irregularities
amounting to more than ₹25,000 crore, including undue benefits worth
₹1,500 crore to certain companies, one of which is in the Adani group.
The CAG said the non-monitoring "of the construction quay in phase 1
of Adani Group-owned Mundra port led to short recovery of ₹118.12
crore."

On 27 February 2010, The Hindu had reported that the anti-corruption
branch of the CBI in Goa had arrested Rajesh Adani, Gautam’s brother
and Managing Director of Adani Exports Limited in Ahmedabad in
connection with a criminal case alleging undervaluation of imports of
naphtha and furnace oil in 2005-06 that had caused a loss of
₹1.07crore to the exchequer.

A criminal case was registered against ten officials of the customs
and central excise departments working in Goa. They were accused of
being part of a conspiracy to deliberately undervalue the imports.

II.
http://www.thecitizen.in/NewsDetail.aspx?Id=3378&The%2FIncredible%2FRise%2Fand%2FRise%2Fof%2FGautam%2FAdani%3A%2FPart%2FTwo

Part Two

NEW DELHI: Returning to the most recent controversy, the Adani group
has been in the news of late after the Australian federal government
allowed it to develop what will become that country's biggest (and one
of the world's biggest) coal mine, as part of a giant $16 billion
(nearly ₹1,00,000 crore) project to build a railway line to export the
black mineral from Queensland's Galilee Basin to India and elsewhere
through the Great Barrier Reef from an expanded port. The project has
been opposed by local inhabitants (aborigines) and environmental
activists.

Australia's Fairfax Media has reported that expensive gifts were given
by the Adani group to leading politicians, including Prime Minister
Tony Abbott, while not suggesting that this was linked to approval of
the group's operations. A firm controlled by Australia's richest woman
Gina Rinehart has reportedly partnered one of Adani's companies to
jointly assess the port expansion.

With the surge in interest in the Australian media about Adani,
Fairfax also published an investigative report into alleged
ill-treatment of thousands of construction labourers hired by
contractors engaged by the Adani group to build luxury houses on the
outskirts of Ahmedabad, Gujarat's most-populous city. Spokespersons of
the Adani group stated that it had not violated any law.

To some, Adani’s ambitious proposed investments in Australia in coal
mining and the Abbot Point Port challenges the conventions of the coal
trading business. On the one hand, much of the coal that is to be
exported is meant for India.

On the other hand, Union Energy Minister Piyush Goyal is keen that
this country's stops importing coal altogether -- be it from
Australia, Indonesia or anywhere else. The reason is that India is
said to possess substantial reserves of the mineral even if the
quality of coal available in India is inferior to Australian or
Indonesian coal.

Roughly two-thirds of the Carmichael coal, or about 40 million tonnes
a year, is meant for India, with about half of the amount intended for
Adani's own power plants. According to ABC Radio, Australia has never
seen anything like this project. Neither, for that matter, has India.

When the mine becomes fully operational, it will become the biggest
coal mining project in Australia by far (twice the size of the next
biggest coal mine) and also one of the largest of its kind anywhere in
the world. This "pioneering" project will reportedly pave the way for
five other "mega" coal mining projects, including ones to be set up by
another Indian conglomerate, the GVK group, and a Chinese group,
Macmines.

Importantly, as the pioneering venture in the Galilee Basin, the Adani
project is likely to have a multiplier effect. The rail and port
infrastructure will probably bring to life five other proposed
mega-mines with a combined capacity to produce 272 million tonnes of
coal a year. In fact, the viability of the infrastructure being built
depends crucially on these projects taking off, in order to share the
cost of the build-up and pay for services.

In effect, Adani's moves will open up the entire Galilee Basin for
mineral exploitation. The Basin is a 250,000 square kilometre area,
slightly bigger than the United Kingdom, and is estimated to hold over
27 billion tonnes of coal.

The Adani group is reportedly facing opposition from native
inhabitants. The Wangan and Jagalingou (W&J) Claim Group which
represents indigenous traditional owners of the lands had rejected the
proposed land use agreement signed in October 2014 by the Queensland
government with the Adani group.

The group has sought legal action in the National Native Title
Tribunal (NNTT) to get a favourable determination. In April 2015, the
group issued a statement claiming that it had arrived at an agreement
with the natives to provide them benefits from the world’s third
largest coal mine. This statement was later refuted by a
representative of the W&J Claim Group who described the Adani group's
statement as "misleading".

The mine has been staunchly opposed by environmentalists on the ground
that it would pollute the ground-water in the region and that carbon
emissions would disturb the fragile and unique ecology of the Great
Barrier Reef.

According to the Green Institute of Australia, the lifetime carbon
dioxide emissions of the coal mined in the Galilee Basin would
conservatively be 24.7 billion tonnes, which is about five per cent of
the carbon budget available for the whole world between 2010 and 2050,
if the people of the planet are to restrict global temperature
increases to within 2 degrees Celsius.

Environmental scientists argue that the ecology of the Great Barrier
Reef is already under pressure. Global warming could adversely affect
the area even more. On top of this, the project would result in
deposition of mud from the dredging of ports. The there would be
dumping of coal dust and coal fragments. The movement of ships would
increase the temperature of the water and air.

Over and above environmental considerations, the commercial viability
of the project has also been questioned. Profitable extraction of coal
is supposed to start by 2017 after building up the infrastructure. The
US-based Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis
estimated in 2014 that the cost of coal produced is likely to remain
above world prices in the foreseeable future and that full-scale
production from the project could be delayed till as late as 2022.
Thus, the Adani company could end up losing large amounts in the
coming years.

In mid-November 2014, the heads of government of the Group of 20 (G20)
countries met at Brisbane, the capital of Queensland. Prime Minister
Modi's business delegation included Gautam Adani and SBI head
Arundhati Bhattacharya. On their return journey, the MoU between the
bank and the group was signed. Now it seems the agreement may be
called off.

Adani has, by and large, been wary of the media, granting few
interviews. In public, he has always been guarded in his remarks. He
has claimed that he has always followed the law and that his proximity
to politicians is on account of the fact that his firms are involved
in infrastructural projects that require government support.

Those close to him have suggested that he has been targetted by Modi's
opponents and envious business rivals. Adani's critics contend that
his rise has been on account of his generosity towards political
leaders and the prevalence of crony capitalism. Under the benevolent
gaze of India's Prime Minister, will the Adani group grow from
strength to strength? Or has it bitten off more than what it can chew
in Australia?

While time alone can provide answers to these questions, Modi is
evidently not particularly perturbed when his political opponents seek
to deride him and describe his government as one that is beholden to
the Adanis and the Ambanis. Why?

After all, nothing in the law of the land prevented Modi from using an
aircraft loaned by Adani.

(Research assistance: Anand Vardhan)

References:

 
http://www.livemint.com/Opinion/PSAjYMTctZg144dW94ODUL/The-death-of-a-1-billion-loan-agreement.html

http://www.livemint.com/Companies/LCFbfLzo9GBjVUdXNDIVQO/Adani-Group-in-talks-with-Korea-China-banks-for-Australia-p.html

http://www.outlookindia.com/printarticle.aspx?289708

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-29658768

http://www.firstpost.com/business/corporate-business/modi-mundra-and-zeal-how-adani-made-it-to-top-10-indian-billionaire-list-2011805.html

http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-09-05/news/41802723_1_adani-group-wharton-india-economic-forum-gujarat-summit

http://www.outlookindia.com/printarticle.aspx?289708

http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-01-02/news/45799234_1_adani-group-dri-revenue-intelligence

http://www.dnaindia.com/bangalore/report-santosh-hegde-s-censure-hits-adani-share-prices-cuts-market-cap-by-rs22000-crore-1571045

http://www.aamaadmiparty.org/adani-group-under-investigation-for-money-laundering

http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/adani-group-md-held-for-evading-customs-duty/article114455.ece;

http://www.outlookindia.com/printarticle.aspx?289708

http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2015/mar/26/aboriginal-group-fights-to-stop-16bn-carmichael-coalmin

http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/concerns-at-barrier-reef-contractors-humanitarian-environment-record-20140904-10cgxk.html

http://in.reuters.com/article/2014/11/12/india-coal-imports-idINKCN0IW0FJ20141112

http://businesstoday.intoday.in/story/gautam-adani-group-australian-coal-mine-investment-analysis/1/213956.html;

https://in.finance.yahoo.com/news/why-adani-betting-10-bn-044252000.html;

http://www.abc.net.au/environment/articles/2014/07/28/4025069.htm;

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/nov/18/carmichael-mine-environmental-impact-unknown-for-years

-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to