I/II.
http://scroll.in/article/723088/indian-government-has-contributed-more-than-ford-foundation-to-setalvads-organisation?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+scroll_in+%28Scroll.in+-+News+that+matters%29&utm_content=Google+Feedfetcher

FOREIGN FUNDING
Indian government has contributed more than Ford Foundation to
Setalvad's organisation
Mridula Chari  · Today · 09:00 am
Indian government has contributed more than Ford Foundation to
Setalvad's organisation
Photo Credit: Kuntal Chakrabarty/IANS

But neither of them paid for the legal cases of the victims of the
Gujarat riots.
The Indian government has placed the Ford Foundation on a watchlist
for giving funds to activist Teesta Setalvad's organisations, claiming
that the money was used for anti-national activities. But the irony of
that charge, Setalvad says, it is the Union government that
contributed the largest amount of funds to one of her organisations.

The Ministry of Human Resource Development gave Rs 1.4 crore to
Setalvad's Sabrang Trust in 2011, outstripping the grant of Rs 1.2
crore made by the Ford Foundation to the organisation in 2009. Both
these grants were for periods of around three years. Together, they
account for about 80% of the total donations the Trust has received
since it registered its account under the Foreign Contributions
Regulation Act in 2007, Setalvad says.

In recent days, both the Gujarat and central governments have raised
questions about Setalvad's organisations, Sabrang Trust and Sabrang
Communications and Publishing Private Limited, receiving funds from
the Ford Foundation.

The Gujarat government wrote a letter to the Union Home Ministry on
April 11, making a number of allegations over the funding. Besides
claiming that the money was used almost entirely for office expenses,
the letter stated, "By allowing [Sabrang Communications and Publishing
Private Limited] to declare that serving and retired naval and Army
officers are engaged in terror generation, Ford Foundation allowed
defamation of Indian military."

About a fortnight later, on April 23, the Ministry of Home Affairs
asked the Reserve Bank of India to put all contributions from the Ford
Foundation on its watchlist - ensuring that no funds from the
Foundation can be routed to any Indian organisation until they have
been approved by the Home Ministry. This is beyond an existing level
of clearance required from the Department of Economic Affairs at the
Union Finance Ministry.

The Home Ministry didn't reply to an email questionnaire sent by
Scroll.in. Despite several attempts, Ford Foundation too did not reply
to requests for comment.

Funds questioned

Apart from the general and undefined "anti-national activity"
accusation, the Home Ministry might be specifically calling into
question two sums of montey that the Ford Foundation transferred to
Sabrang Communications and Publishing, which does not have an FCRA
account, according to an unidentified ministry official quoted by the
Times of India.

In 2004 and 2006, Sabrang Communications, which publishes a monthly
journal called Communalism Combat, entered into a consultancy
agreement with the Foundation "to address communalism and caste-based
discrimination in India through active research, Web-based information
dissemination, development of civil society networks and media
strategies". In 2004, it received Rs 40 lakh for two years, and in
2006, Rs 90 lakh for three years.

The funds were treated as income for the organisation and so the
Sabrang Communications says it was eligible for them. According to the
rules of the Foreign Contributions Regulations Act, Sabrang
Communications, as a publisher, is ineligible for foreign grants. But
it can receive foreign contributions as consultancy fees and salaries
in the course of its business.

This was not a grant to which FCRA rules would apply, emphasised
Setalvad, and was treated as salaried taxable income to the
organisation. The Ford Foundation even deducted tax at source when
transferring these amounts each year. Sabrang Communications, in turn,
used the money during the normal course of its work, said Setalvad,
including for documenting and publicising information relating to
communal violence over the years in places such as Kandhamal, Delhi,
Gujarat and Mumbai, and for advocacy projects.

Setalvad and her husband Javed Anand say they verified their
eligibility for a consultancy agreement with the Foundation with an
eminent lawyer in Mumbai at the time. They maintain the money was used
for regular business of Sabrang Communications.

Officials from the Home Ministry, which supervises donations under the
Foreign Contributions Regulation Act, inspected the accounts of
Citizens for Justice and Peace and Sabrang Trust over six days from
April 6. On the last day of inspection, they also gave them a standard
FCRA questionnaire for Sabrang Communications, to which Setalvad and
Anand declared their consultancy agreement. Setalvad says they said
they would get back to her if anything irregular. As of now, the
ministry has not yet communicated with her.

She flatly denies charges of carrying out "anti-national activities".

"What has Citizens for Justice and Peace or Sabrang done wrong?" she
asked. "We have done everything to strengthen the constitutional
framework and the secular fundamentals of this country. How dare
anyone say this is anti-national? Calling constitutional work
anti-national is, I think, anti-national."

Not so foreign

Setalvad and Javed Anand run three organisations. In 1993, after the
Babri Masjid demolition and the Bombay riots, they started Sabrang
Communications and Publishing. Sabrang Trust followed in 1995 as an
advocacy group for communal harmony. Finally, in 2002, they started
Citizens for Justice and Peace, a legal aid group for victims of
communal violence, which handles the legal cases of the 2002 Gujarat
riot victims.

Sabrang Trust and Citizens for Justice and Peace registered FCRA
accounts in November 2007. Until then, all their donations came from
Indian sources.

Citizens for Justice and Peace is mostly funded by local donors,
Setalvad says. It received its first foreign contributions - Rs 18.71
lakh from two donors - in March 2009, for procuring two ambulances
after the November 2008 terrorist attack in Mumbai. Since 2010, around
20% of its funds, around Rs 80 lakh, have come from the United Nations
Voluntary Fund for Victims of Torture, including a grant in January
2014. This is by far the largest of its foreign donations, she says.
The rest, around Rs 4 crore, came from local donors, including the
personal contributions of Board members of Citizens for Justice and
Peace and family and friends.

For a project lasting from October 2009 to March 2013, Sabrang Trust
received Rs 1.2 crore from the Ford Foundation as "tie-off support to
strengthen [the trust's] conflict resolution and peace building
activities in Gujarat and Maharashtra". These activities, Setalvad
says, include organising peace building meetings and workshops, not
centred on the Gujarat riots alone.

For instance, the Trust organised a workshop to advocate for the
codification of Muslim Personal Law to reduce gender injustice. To
commemorate 20 years of the 1992-'93 riots in Bombay, the Trust
organised a workshop with activists working for justice for the
victims of the 1984 riots in Delhi, Gujarat riots in 2002 and
Khairlanji massacre in 2006. It also worked with the Maharashtra
government to publicise its scholarship schemes for minority students.

Less than 20% of the foreign contributions to both organisations were
used for office expenses, Setalvad says, much less than the
FCRA-stipulated limit of 50%. She clarifies that no Ford Foundation
grant is active at present.

Previous governments, both at the Centre and the Gujarat state,
approved of the Sabrang Trust. In 2011, the Ministry of Human Resource
Development granted it Rs 1.4 crore, outstripping the contribution of
the Ford Foundation. The funds were given for expanding the activities
of KHOJ-Education for a Plural India, an education initiative that
addresses communal, caste, class and gender biases in schools. Sabrang
Trust works with around 2,000 students in Gujarat and Maharashtra
every year and builds supplementary material for their textbooks.

Credibility at stake

This is not the first time Setalvad has been targeted since Citizens
for Justice and Peace took on the work of representing survivors of
the Gujarat riots.

In fact, the Central government's decision to closely examine her
organisations' funding stems from a case filed in January 2014 against
Setalvad and Anand for alleged embezzlement of funds for a proposed
museum at the Gulberg Society in Ahmedabad.

Since that case was registered, Setalvad and Anand say they have
submitted over 20,000 documents to auditors. Despite it being a case
of paperwork rather than subjective details, the Gujarat police still
wants to interrogate them in custody. A plea for anticipatory bail is
pending in the Supreme Court and their accounts remain frozen.

Apart from the Ford Foundation funds, according to media reports, the
government might also examine the contribution of the Human Resources
Development Ministry to Sabrang Trust. However, there has been no
development on this since the reports appeared in March.

Setalvad alleges that there is a sustained campaign to discredit their work.

"The government wants to attack us at three levels," she said. "One is
to please their constituency. Second, any individuals or institutions
who have donated to us might get scared off. And third, this campaign
sends a strong message to others like us that this is what it means to
have a majority of 292 under this regime."

That does not mean they will stop their work, she says. "Our
activities will continue irrespective of funding from this or that
organisation."

II.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/05/08/opinion/indias-chilling-crackdown.html?referrer&_r=0

Opinion

EDITORIAL

India's Chilling Crackdown

By THE EDITORIAL BOARD
MAY 7, 2015

The Ford Foundation is among the world's best-known charitable
organizations, dispensing billions of dollars globally for projects
aimed at reducing poverty, fighting injustice, improving education and
advancing democracy.

So it was alarming when India's Ministry of Home Affairs last month
placed the foundation, which has made $500 million in grants to
organizations in India since 1952, on a national security watch list.
That means it cannot give money to Indian groups without permission
from Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government. The move shook the
donor community and triggered fears of a broader crackdown on civic
activism -- fears quickly realized when the government canceled the
registration of nearly 9,000 foreign-funded civic and nongovernmental
groups.

The Ford case smacks of political payback. The listing stems from a
complaint by the Gujurat State government about the Sabrang Trust, a
private group that has received grants from Ford. The trust, its
founder, Teesta Setalvad, and her husband have worked on behalf of
victims of sectarian riots in Gujarat in 2002, when Mr. Modi was chief
minister. They have also sought to bring charges against Mr. Modi for
enabling the violence, which left more than 1,000 people dead.

The state asked the ministry to investigate the trust for "disturbing
the communal harmony here and carrying out anti-national propaganda
against India in foreign countries." The state had previously accused
Ms. Setalvad and her husband of embezzling funds meant for a museum to
honor the riot victims. Their advocates say they are victims of a
political vendetta. One Indian official has described Ford and
Greenpeace, which is now facing closure in India, as "agents of
Western strategic interests." Although democratic India is a far cry
from Russia, China and Egypt, similarly chilling talk was heard when
authoritarian leaders in those countries moved to crush civic
activism.

Mr. Modi has an ambitious agenda to lift millions of people out of
poverty and play a bigger role on the world stage. He almost certainly
cannot attract the investment he needs while imposing a repressive
social order and devaluing India's greatest asset, a robust democracy.

-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to