http://scroll.in/article/737092/first-read-praful-bidwais-final-book-examines-whether-the-left-can-rise-again-in-india

BOOK EXCERPT
First read: Praful Bidwai’s final book examines whether the Left can
rise again in India

‘A pertinent question is why left-wing politics has not flourished in
India as a vital source of legitimacy for parties to the extent that
might be expected in a society with a million injustices and growing
inequalities.’
Praful Bidwai  · Yesterday · 12:30 pm

India has long been a social-political oddity: a country with
widespread poverty and wretched deprivation, but where the
underprivileged find no voice in most political parties; one of the
world’s fastest growing economies, where less than a tenth of the
population has regular jobs and where a quarter-million farmers have
recently committed suicide; a democracy with largely free and fair
elections, which has failed to establish the rule of law and where
human-rights violations are rampant amidst caste- and religion- driven
hatred and vicious discrimination against women.

A pertinent question is why left-wing politics has not flourished in
India as a vital source of legitimacy for parties to the extent that
might be expected in a society with a million injustices and growing
inequalities, recently worsened by Hindutva and neoliberal capitalism.
Historically, left politics in India has shrunk in range and variety.

It was once a rainbow comprised of breathtakingly different currents,
including Parliamentary and non-Parliamentary communist parties;
socialists of different hues ranging from the Congress Socialist Party
to the Gandhians, to followers of the viscerally anti-Congress Ram
Manohar Lohia. It also encompassed anti-caste movements with radical
agendas associated with Ambedkar’s Republican Party of India or later
with the Dalit Panthers; and Maoists and
Marxist–Leninist parties which believe in an insurrectionary seizure
of power.

There also used to be independent groups such as the Peasants’ and
Workers’ Party and Lal Nishan Party in Maharashtra or the
Revolutionary Communist Party of India in West Bengal and Assam which
set regionally limited agendas; there were currents like the
Chhattisgarh Mukti Morcha of Shankar Guha Niyogi which aimed to create
embryos of workers’ and peasants’ republics; and there were many
smaller progressive currents which aimed to rescue revolutionary
Marxist politics from its ‘distortions’, active not just within the
intelligentsia, but also in unions and other formations.

***The rainbow has contracted in size and lost some of its hues. Many
political currents have shrunk in variety and waned, while a few new
ones have taken root.*** [Emphasis in original.]

The socialists have long ceased to have a coherent organisational
expression (barring the largely caste- and community-based,
family-driven Samajwadi Party). But groupings like Samajwadi Samagam
have grown. The once-strong PWP is now a feeble force. The CMM has
split irrevocably. Liberal social democracy, always weak in India,
which found expression in the Congress and other centrist parties, no
longer exists as a force.

New differentiations have appeared within the Left spectrum, the most
important of which is the division between the party Left and
non-party political Left, the latter comprised of ‘people’s movement’
structures and federations of civil society groups like the National
Alliance of People’s Movements, National Fishworkers’ Forum, All India
Union of Forest Working People, Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan, Indian
Social Action Forum, New Trade Union Initiative, Shramik Mukti Dal,
New Socialist Initiative, Radical Socialist, and Campaign for Survival
and Dignity.

The party Left is now reduced primarily to two currents: the
mainstream Parliamentary Communist parties and their affiliates, and
non-parliamentary Maoist or Marxist–Leninist groupings. The first is a
Parliamentary alliance and campaigning bloc mainly comprised of the
Communist Party of India (Marxist) or CPI(M), the Communist Party of
India (CPI), the Revolutionary Socialist Party (RSP),
and the All India Forward Bloc
(FB), recently joined by the Communist Party of India
(Marxist-Leninist-Liberation) and Socialist Unity Centre of India
(Communist).

The Maoist groupings – more than thirty at last count – are
ideologically variegated and geographically dispersed, but the most
important current is the Communist Party of India–Maoist, formed in
2004 after a merger between the People’s War group and the Maoist
Communist Centre of India. It is particularly active in India’s
well-forested and mineral-rich tribal heartland, which extractive
capitalism wants to exploit rapaciously. Some eighty-odd districts
there are declared by the Indian state as dangerously affected by
‘left- wing extremism’ where paramilitary troops and special police
forces rule rather than the civilian administration. The Maoists have
waxed and waned, and now seem to be in decline, with the recent arrest
or effective immobilisation of some of their top leaders.

The present book has an admittedly narrow focus: it deals primarily
with the parliamentary communist parties. This focus arises from three
factors. First, the mainstream bloc has had the longest and richest
experience of trying to grapple with India’s bourgeois–liberal
democratic system, which despite limitations, enjoys a fair degree of
popular legitimacy, and offers opportunities for progressive change
and potentially transformative politics. Parties working within the
system face obvious constraints: of having to operate within the four
corners of the Constitution, and to fight elections, which are
increasingly becoming a Big-Money game. They also run the risk of
being co-opted by the system and rendered utterly ineffective.

***However, the greatest challenge for Left politics in India lies
precisely in the bourgeois-democratic arena, and the possibilities it
contains both within the state and in society, the latter with its own
institutions, organisations, and freedoms of association and
action.*** [Emphasis in original.]

The Maoists, despite their admirable commitment and dedication, have
totally retreated from this challenge. And the non-party political
Left does not directly engage with it—often for well-considered
reasons—through state-level participation, as distinct from popular
education and mobilisation, or advocacy and lobbying.

Second, the mainstream bloc is the biggest of
all left currents, and has had the longest continuous organised
existence, notwithstanding various splits, dissensions and mutual
rivalries. It also shares many ideological and strategic premises,
which are today in need of revision.

If the Left summons up the will to revisit its strategic perspectives
and undertake course correction, its relative cohesion and access to
resources can reduce its vulnerability and offer it some protection.
The opposite can happen if the bloc remains ideologically rigid. This
book attempts to create a basis for understanding which way the
mainstream Left might be headed.

Third, astonishing as this might seem, there is very little recent
analytical literature on the mainstream Left at the national level—as
distinct from state-specific studies and articles. The present book
will hopefully help fill this void by combining an analysis of the
state- and national-level performance of the left parties with a
critical appraisal of their ideological premises, strategic
perspectives, political mobilisation approaches, and organisational
doctrines and practices.

***The real lessons for the future lie in how well the mainstream Left
acquits itself in the face of the challenge of working within the
bourgeois-democratic system and uses the freedoms available within it
to expand the space for radical politics, empower the exploited and
oppressed, and work for a transition to a post-capitalist society. On
test is the ability of its national leadership to overcome the grave
crisis they confront today as the Left faces its Phoenix Moment.***
[Emphasis in original.]

This book was planned well before the downslide of India’s mainstream
Communist parties became apparent in electoral terms. Indeed, it
should have been written ten, if not twenty, years ago. It is a
coincidence that it is being published just when the left parties find
themselves in the grip of their worst-ever crisis. What is not a
coincidence is the persistence of some of the long-term processes that
drove my decades-long analytical interest in the Left – its
ideological deficiencies, theoretical rigidity, aridity in programme
formulation, and undemocratic organisational practices.

A brief personal note is in order here. I have for more than four
decades considered myself a socialist who broadly accepts Marx’s
analysis of capitalism. I was exposed to the working class movement in
my student days in Bombay and worked with trade unions and Dalit youth
in the slums of Matunga Labour Camp (a part of Dharavi). I never
joined a left political party because I found none of them
sufficiently undogmatic or open to new ideas—in particular receptive
to my staunchly anti-Stalinist views—but I have worked closely and
happily with members of a variety of left parties all my life.

In the early 1970s, I was associated with the Magowa Group and the
Shramik Sanghatana which was active among the Bhil tribals in northern
Maharashtra, where I worked briefly. Later, I was also part of what
mutated from the Revolutionary Bolshevik Circle to the Platform
Tendency, based in Delhi, Bombay and Bangalore, which took theory
extremely seriously and exposed its members to Marxism as an
intellectual adventure—with an amazingly rich repertoire of
literature, views and ideas on a stunning variety of subjects.

I was fortunate enough to be able to research the history of the
Indian communist and trade union movements of the 1940s, and also to
combine this with union activism with outstanding labour organizers
like D. Thankappan of the Kamani Workers’ Union, and later, the Centre
for Workers’ Management. I spent a fruitful period in Europe in the
late 1970s, and observed the communist parties as well as the then
vibrant Far Left in France and Italy go through a fateful transition,
which was, alas, aborted after the Soviet collapse. My education in
science, technology, economics and philosophy, my interests in the
social sciences, and my career in analytical journalism, helped me
understand issues like ecology and energy and integrate some of the
insights I thus gained into my understanding of socialism.

…

I can only hope that this book will persuade at least some readers to
believe, like me, that the Left is indispensable to the health of
Indian democracy. If it did not exist, we would have to invent it.

Excerpted with permission from The Phoenix Moment: Challenges
Confronting the Indian Left, Praful Bidwai. To be published by
HarperCollins India in October 2015.


-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to