[This procedure detailed in the draft Bill due to be introduced in the
current session of Parliament involves collection of "intimate body
samples" of living persons from "the genital or anal area, the
buttocks and also breasts in the case of a female".
Intimate forensic procedure includes "external examination" of private
parts, taking samples from there "of pubic hair" or "by swab or
washing" or "by vacuum suction, by scraping or by lifting by tape" and
"taking of a photograph or video recording of, or an impression or
cast of a wound" in those areas.
...
It (i.e. the draft bill) also makes clear that intimate forensic
procedure will be applied not just to an "offender" who is defined as
"a person who has been convicted of or an undertrial charged with a
specified offence". The DNA data bank will also be authorized to
collect samples from anybody who is deemed to be "suspect" in relation
to any crime. The range of persons on who the data bank will maintain
"indices" includes those connected with "crime scene" and those with
"missing persons". What is even more open-ended is the clause
empowering the data bank to maintain an index on "volunteers" and
"such other DNA indices as may be specified by regulations" issued
after the enactment of the law.
Equally significant is the clause stating that the samples collected
in relation to DNA profiling "shall be made available" not only in
criminal cases but also "civil matters" such as disputes relating to
paternity or maternity, surrogacy, organ donation, immigration,
emigration and individual identity. Listed among these routine civil
matters is, shockingly, "issues relating to pedigree". The draft Bill
does not however explain anywhere why exactly human DNA profiling will
be applied to determine pedigree.
...
Despite its far-reaching consequences for privacy, the draft Bill has
not been placed in the public domain for pre-legislative consultation.
Since it is slated to be introduced in the ongoing session of
Parliament, representatives of civil society may now get a chance to
express their views if and only when the Bill is referred to a
standing committee.

(Excerpted from, and highlighted in, the report at sl. no. I below.)

In the works since 2007, the Bill is now being pushed by none other PM
Narendra Modi, who’s keen to see it off the ground as a powerful
technology for establishing identity in criminal or civil proceedings
and for other specified purposes.The use of Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid(
DNA) test for human profiling has triggered a debate. Particularly,
after Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi expressed the view before the
Supreme Court that the Right to Privacy is no fundamental right for
Indian citizens. This he said in defence of the Aadhar identification
card.

(Excerpted from, and highlighted in, the report at sl. no. II below.)]

I/II.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/DNA-profiling-bill-allows-for-intimate-samples/articleshow/48220717.cms

DNA profiling bill allows for 'intimate' samples
Manoj Mitta,TNN | Jul 26, 2015, 02.32 AM IST

The human DNA profiling Bill, as recommended by an official expert
committee, has controversial clauses dealing with "issues relating to
pedigree" and introducing an intrusive mode of collecting samples from
living persons called "intimate forensic procedure".

NEW DELHI: The human DNA profiling Bill, as recommended by an official
expert committee, has controversial clauses dealing with "issues
relating to pedigree" and introducing an intrusive mode of collecting
samples from living persons called "intimate forensic procedure".

***This procedure detailed in the draft Bill due to be introduced in
the current session of Parliament involves collection of "intimate
body samples" of living persons from "the genital or anal area, the
buttocks and also breasts in the case of a female".*** [Emphasis
added.]

***Intimate forensic procedure includes "external examination" of
private parts, taking samples from there "of pubic hair" or "by swab
or washing" or "by vacuum suction, by scraping or by lifting by tape"
and "taking of a photograph or video recording of, or an impression or
cast of a wound" in those areas.*** [Emphasis added.]

Submitted in January by the committee headed by T S Rao, senior
adviser to the department of biotechnology, the draft Bill explains
that "intimate body samples from living persons shall be collected and
intimate forensic procedures shall be performed by a registered
medical practitioner".

***It also makes clear that intimate forensic procedure will be
applied not just to an "offender" who is defined as "a person who has
been convicted of or an undertrial charged with a specified offence".
The DNA data bank will also be authorized to collect samples from
anybody who is deemed to be "suspect" in relation to any crime. The
range of persons on who the data bank will maintain "indices" includes
those connected with "crime scene" and those with "missing persons".
What is even more open-ended is the clause empowering the data bank to
maintain an index on "volunteers" and "such other DNA indices as may
be specified by regulations" issued after the enactment of the law.***
[Emphasis added.]

READ ALSO: Centre to create DNA bank of unidentified bodies

DNA profiling for armed forces by 2020

***Equally significant is the clause stating that the samples
collected in relation to DNA profiling "shall be made available" not
only in criminal cases but also "civil matters" such as disputes
relating to paternity or maternity, surrogacy, organ donation,
immigration, emigration and individual identity. Listed among these
routine civil matters is, shockingly, "issues relating to pedigree".
The draft Bill does not however explain anywhere why exactly human DNA
profiling will be applied to determine pedigree.*** [Emphasis added.]

Apart from the bald reference to pedigree issues, the draft Bill says
that the information related to DNA profile shall be made available
"for creation and maintenance of a population statistics Data Bank
that is to be used, as prescribed, for the purposes of identification
research, protocol development or quality control provided that it
does not contain any personally identifiable information and does not
violate ethical norms".

The clause relating to pedigree may be connected to an existing
practice of linking caste to the DNA sample. The identification form
issued by the Hyderabad-based Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and
Diagnostics (CDFD), the premier national institute, contains a column
requiring the person giving a blood sample to mention the caste. This
prompted one of the members of the expert panel, Usha Ramanathan, to
say the column resurrected the discredited idea of "genes of
criminality".

Ramanathan struck a note of dissent even on the application of DNA
profiling to the so-called issues relating to pedigree. She wrote:
"Biological determinism ought not to displace environmental and
sociological understanding." On intimate forensic procedure,
Ramanathan stressed the need "to question" whether it could be avoided
for living persons if "a sample of adequate quality" could be obtained
through less intrusive means. Such concerns have evidently been
overruled by the majority in the expert committee, which included the
director of CDFD, J Gowrishankar. For, rather than coming out with a
report along with dissent notes, the committee simply submitted the
minutes of the four meetings that had been held by it.

***Despite its far-reaching consequences for privacy, the draft Bill
has not been placed in the public domain for pre-legislative
consultation. Since it is slated to be introduced in the ongoing
session of Parliament, representatives of civil society may now get a
chance to express their views if and only when the Bill is referred to
a standing committee.*** [Emphasis added.]

II.
http://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/Human-DNA-Profiling-Bill-Waiting-in-the-Wings/2015/07/26/article2940826.ece

Human DNA Profiling Bill Waiting in the Wings
By Santwana Bhattacharya Published: 26th July 2015 04:59 AM Last
Updated: 26th July 2015 04:59 AM

NEW DELHI: ‘Political DNA’ analysis may come in handy in the electoral
fray, but for solving a case and picking up clues from the scene of a
crime, a Human DNA Profiling Bill is on the agenda. Or to be precise,
ready for introduction this Monsoon session of Parliament, but for the
Opposition disruptions.

***In the works since 2007, the Bill is now being pushed by none other
PM Narendra Modi, who’s keen to see it off the ground as a powerful
technology for establishing identity in criminal or civil proceedings
and for other specified purposes.The use of Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid(
DNA) test for human profiling has triggered a debate. Particularly,
after Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi expressed the view before the
Supreme Court that the Right to Privacy is no fundamental right for
Indian citizens. This he said in defence of the Aadhar identification
card.*** [Emphasis added.]

Along with the mandatory biometric provision of the Aadhaar card,
which is basically fingerprint profiling and neat cataloguing of
population, its properties and income through a unique ID number, the
DNA profiling would go a long way in further marking the population.

The declared goal of the two is different, though. While Aadhaar
devised ostensibly to provide targeted social subsidy, the objective
of Human DNA Profiling Bill is to assist criminal/civil proceedings.

The Human DNA Profiling Bill, 2015, draft admits that the “DNA
analysis offers sensitive information which, if misused can cause harm
to person or society.  Hence the “need to regulate the use through an
Act passed by Parliament only for lawful purposes”.  The Bill also
proposes a “National DNA Databank with policies of use and access to
information’’, its “retention and deletion’’. The Bank will have a
manager--an expert in the field--to execute and maintain the system
that the Bill seeks to set up.

There will be a DNA Profiling Board of eminent scientists,
administrators and law enforcement officers to administer and carry
out the functions assigned to it under the Act. The proposed law,
which is ready for introduction as confirmed by the Science &
Technology Ministry, is in keeping with the objectives of creating a
Databank and administration board.

The Bill lays down a regulatory framework and standards for
laboratories, collection of human body substance, custody trail from
collection to reporting and also the monitoring of the Databank.

However, some experts have doubts about the effectiveness of human DNA
profiling as a method of cracking criminal and civil cases or of
maintaining a Databank for criminal profiling. They feel, DNA
profiling is in a way a technological extension of the colonial
project of population profiling, that led to proscribing of certain
ancient Indian tribes as “criminal’’ or “criminally prone’’. Also, the
declared objective in the draft Bill, a copy of which is with Express,
that the data could be used for “other purposes’’ has generated a
sense of apprehension as what it could be.
-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to