http://scroll.in/article/698006/rani-padmini-and-four-other-hindutva-history-myths-exploded
​
Rani Padmini and four other Hindutva history myths exploded

As it turns out, some commonly held stories about our 5,000-year-old past
simply aren't true.

Girish Shahane

<http://scroll.in/authors/611>  · Dec 31, 2014 · 05:45 am
[image: Rani Padmini and four other Hindutva history myths exploded]
Photo Credit: Tejaswini Lonari in


<whatsapp://send?text=Rani%20Padmini%20and%20four%20other%20Hindutva%20history%20myths%20exploded%0A%0Ahttp://scroll.in/article/698006/rani-padmini-and-four-other-hindutva-history-myths-exploded>
<https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=http://scroll.in/article/698006/rani-padmini-and-four-other-hindutva-history-myths-exploded>
<https://twitter.com/share?text=Rani%20Padmini%20and%20four%20other%20Hindutva%20history%20myths%20exploded&url=http://scroll.in/article/698006/rani-padmini-and-four-other-hindutva-history-myths-exploded&via=scroll_in>
<?Subject=Rani%20Padmini%20and%20four%20other%20Hindutva%20history%20myths%20exploded&body=http://scroll.in//article/698006/rani-padmini-and-four-other-hindutva-history-myths-exploded>
<https://plus.google.com/share?url=http://scroll.in/article/698006/rani-padmini-and-four-other-hindutva-history-myths-exploded>
<http://www.reddit.com/submit?url=http://scroll.in/article/698006/rani-padmini-and-four-other-hindutva-history-myths-exploded&title=Rani%20Padmini%20and%20four%20other%20Hindutva%20history%20myths%20exploded>


The biggest news story coming out of India in 2014 was the triumph at the
polls of the Bharatiya Janata Party. Led by the charismatic Narendra Modi,
the BJP achieved what many considered impossible: an absolute majority in
the Lok Sabha. Modi and a number of his colleagues subscribe to ideas I
have described in a previous column as Raving Loony Hindutva History
<http://scroll.in/article/690475/a-short-history-of-how-modi-and-rajnath-came-to-believe-that-mythology-is-science/>.
The BJP’s misreading of history, however, is also underpinned by versions
of history that circulate as truth within the mainstream. Here, in reverse
chronological order, I list five major myths that have gained mainstream
acceptance in India.

1. The Myth of Rani Padmini

In 1303 AD, Alauddin Khilji, the Turkic Sultan of Delhi, captured
Chittorgarh after a long siege. Two hundred and thirty-seven years later,
an Awadhi poet named Malik Muhammad Jayasi composed a poem titled
*Padmavat *about the fall of Chittor. The tale was picked up in succeeding
eras by historians such as the chronicler of Akbar’s reign Abul Fazl.

The story of Padmini varies from one writer to another but the basic
contours are similar. A sorcerer banished by the king of Mewar Ratan Singh
finds refuge in the Khilji court, where he fills the Sultan’s ears with
tales of the beauty of Ratan Singh’s wife, Padmini. Alauddin manages to get
a glimpse of her, and is enraptured. He captures Ratan Singh by deceit, and
offers to release him in exchange for Padmini. The Rajputs hatch a cunning
stratagem to free their king, but lose several warriors in the process.
Alauddin defeats the weakened Rajput army, only to discover that Padmini
and all other women in Chittor fort have committed jauhar.

Rani Padmini is not mentioned in any Rajput or Sultanate annals, and
there’s absolutely no historical evidence she existed. Alauddin Khilji, one
of the finest generals in India’s military history, certainly required no
treachery to subdue Chittor. He repelled successive Mongol invasions while
conquering much of Rajasthan and Gujarat. But what has survived of him is
the image of a lustful, deceitful, tyrant pitted against chivalrous Rajputs.

2. The Myth of Prithviraj Chauhan

History, they say, is written by the winners. The best poetry, though, is
often composed by the losers and, in India at least, outweighs historical
accounts. Prithviraj Chauhan ruled Delhi in the late 12th century AD. In
1191, the Afghan ruler Muhammad Ghuri took the fortress of Bhatinda on the
border of Prithviraj’s kingdom. Prithviraj advanced towards the frontier,
and met and defeated Ghuri’s army at Tarain. The next year, Ghuri returned
with a stronger force, defeated Prithviraj, and had him executed.

Pretty standard give-and-take for that age. In the hands of Prithviraj’s
court poet Chand Bardai, and several later writers who embellished the
narrative, the chivalrous Prithviraj defeated and imprisoned Ghuri, but
generously set him free. The foe returned, attacked unfairly at night,
captured and blinded the Rajput king, and took him back to his capital.
Prithviraj’s companion convinced Ghuri to let the blind king demonstrate
his skill as an archer. Instructed by the companion, Prithviraj killed
Muhammad Ghuri before ending his own life in a suicide pact.

I grew up believing this to be historical truth, thanks to the volume of
Amar Chitra Katha about Prithviraj’s life. I suppose children today
watching television serials about Prithviraj and Padmini swallow the same
fictions. It is noteworthy that no cases have been filed in any Indian
court against these erroneous retellings of Indian history.

3. The Myth of a Non-Violent India

“…our religion is truer than any other religion, because it never
conquered, because it never shed blood.” Swami Vivekananda, who assiduously
propagated the myth of peaceful India, often used “religion”, “nation” and
“race” interchangeably. In Colombo in 1897, he said, “India has for
thousands of years peacefully existed… We, of all nations of the world,
have never been a conquering race, and that blessing is on our head.”
Ironically, Sri Lanka is one of the countries that Indian kings (Hindu ones
at that, for in such a reckoning only Hindu kings count) have repeatedly
invaded. The Cholas also launched naval expeditions against towns and
regions across South-East Asia in the 11th century AD.

Hindu rulers rarely hesitated to invade neighbouring domains, with all the
killing and plunder associated with the business. If they rarely ventured
outside the subcontinent, it had less to do with a reluctance to shed blood
or invade foreign lands than with the juicier targets close to home. A
simple cost-benefit analysis explains why it made sense for Afghan and
Turkic cavalry to raid the fertile Indian plains, and no sense for Indian
kings to transport their elephants, thousands of foot-soldiers, and
complicated supply lines into the mountains to conquer a land of sheep
herders. Shah Jahan tried invading Samarkand, out of a sense of duty to his
forebears, and his army paid a terrible price.

4. The Myth of Sanskrit

Sanskrit has produced a marvellous quantity of hymns, philosophical
meditations, poems, epics, plays, and treatises. It is without a shadow of
a doubt one of the most culturally significant languages in the world. What
it is not is the “mother of all languages”, or even the foundational tongue
of the branch to which is belongs, known as the Indo-European family of
languages.

The first person to discover this language family, William Jones, suggested
back in 1786 that Sanskrit, Latin and Greek, “have sprung from some common
source, which, perhaps, no longer exists”. He was exactly right. That
source is now called proto-Indo-European, and is considered to have been
spoken in the vicinity of the Black Sea around 5,500 to 6,000 years ago.

In India, though, the idea is anathema that an ancestor of Sanskrit was
spoken by pastoral nomads living in what is modern-day Turkey and Ukraine.
For that would make Sanskrit essentially a language like many others. Which
is what it is.

 5. The Myth of a 5,000-year-old civilisation

Our Foreign minister Sushama Swaraj recently attended a function
celebrating the 5151st anniversary of the Bhagavad Gita. That dating
belongs to Raving Loony Hindutva History, but the 5,000 year mark is
commonly used to describe everything connected with Hindu culture. The
Vedas? At least 5,000 years old. Ayurveda? 5,000 years old
<http://www.chopra.com/our-services/ayurveda>. Yoga, 5,000 years old
<http://www.americanyogaassociation.org/general.html>, or a little more.
Indian art? 5,000 years old
<http://www.amazon.com/Alamkara-5000-Years-Indian-Art/dp/8185822255>.
Mathematics, astronomy, grammar, you name it, it is all 5,000 years old.

In truth, almost nothing in India is 5,000 years old. The ruins of the
Harappan civilisation come closest, but the artefacts that have survived,
aside from a few pot shards, don’t date earlier than 2500 BC. The earliest
literature we have was composed about 3,500 years ago, and there’s precious
little art that’s datable to a period before 500 BC. India’s major
mathematical achievements originated almost exclusively in the medieval
era, while the asanas used in contemporary yoga have, in a majority of
cases, an illustrated or descriptive history going back little over a
century.

The fake 5,000-year figure plays into the hands of those who believe India
once enjoyed a golden age before it was corrupted by, take your pick, the
Kalyug, Muslim invaders, British imperialists, all of the above.

We welcome your comments at [email protected]
<?Subject=Rani%20Padmini%20and%20four%20other%20Hindutva%20history%20myths%20exploded&[email protected]>
​

-- 
Regards

Xavier William

“Faith moves mountains, but only science (sic) can move them to the right
place...”― Joseph Goebbels
<http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/281832.Joseph_Goebbels>.
"Ridicule is often the only possible weapon against ridiculous
propositions" Thomas Jefferson
Propositions which are revered today as sacred may prove to be ridiculous
tomorrow - me

Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups - George
Carlin

Religion is regarded by the common people as holy, by the wise as evil
(sic), and by the rulers as useful - Senecca

: Our remedies oft in ourselves do lie, Which we ascribe to Heaven or
quackery (sic) - Shakespeare

Those who have nothing to boast of glorify their heritage - Thomas Paine

“All superstition is much the same, whether it be that of astrology,
dreams, omens, retributive judgment or the like, in all of which the
deluded believers observe events which are fulfilled, but neglect and pass
over their failure, though it be much more common.” Francis Bacon

-- 

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Sacred Illusions" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to