[To be true, India is certainly not imploding with religious violence.
But the protests against intolerance by artists and writers appear not
to be so much a reaction to the scale of incidents, but a creeping
anxiety over whether the highest levels of the government, including
Mr Modi, seriously want to condemn or put their imprimatur behind
them.
...
(C)riticising Mr Modi is increasingly being conflated with defaming India.
...
Far away from the shrill echo chamber of social media, the majority of
Indians have proved to be calmer and more sceptical. The results of
the recent Bihar election are a good example of that.
...
There were a number of federal ministers present when Khan made his
remarks at an awards ceremony on Tuesday. Many wondered why Arun
Jaitley, the senior-most minister in the audience, did not stand up
and say he understood the actor's anxiety and that his government
would guarantee that every Indian, irrespective of his belief, was
safe?
Why are Mr Modi and his ministers not articulating some of these
elementary things?]

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-34918431

What the backlash against Bollywood's Aamir Khan tells us about India
Soutik Biswas
Delhi correspondent

25 November 2015
 From the section India

Aamir Khan is a top Bollywood star

The bitter backlash against Bollywood star Amir Khan's remarks about
"growing intolerance" in India tells us a few things about the world's
largest democracy.

At a journalism awards ceremony, Khan said there was a growing sense
of fear, insecurity and despondency in the country, and that when he
discussed things with his filmmaker wife, Kiran Rao, she wondered
whether the family should move out of India.

"It is disastrous and big statement for Kiran to make to me. She fears
for her child, what the atmosphere around us will be, she feels scared
to open the newspaper every day. There is a growing sense of disquiet,
and despondency. You feel depressed, you feel low. Why is this
happening?" Khan said.

Many believe Khan was spot on. In drawing-rooms in recent months,
friends and acquaintances have told me that they worry about India -
the dull economy, shambolic criminal-justice system, unchecked
corruption, the fussing about non-issues, and now the acts of
intolerance and the coarse and polarised levels of debate - and they
would prefer their children to leave. There is a sense that the
immense hope that Prime Minister Narendra Modi had offered before
sweeping to power last year is fast slipping away.

Many high-profile writers and artists have raised concerns about what
they feel is rising religious and cultural intolerance - rationalists
have been killed and a Muslim man lynched over suspicions he consumed
beef.

Not imploding
***To be true, India is certainly not imploding with religious
violence. But the protests against intolerance by artists and writers
appear not to be so much a reaction to the scale of incidents, but a
creeping anxiety over whether the highest levels of the government,
including Mr Modi, seriously want to condemn or put their imprimatur
behind them.*** [Emphasis added.]

To make matters worse, Mr Modi and his senior ministers have not been
quick enough to speak out against the incidents and hate speech, and
when they have eventually done so, they have sounded scripted and
remote. Finance Minister Arun Jaitley, for example, famously said that
the lynching of the Muslim man would actually hurt India's image and
"amount to policy diversions".

But the fierce public and social media backlash against Aamir Khan by
the ruling BJP and supporters of Mr Modi possibly holds up a mirror to
hardened positions in today's India.

Khan (left) said his filmmaker wife Kiran Rao (right) had even
suggested that they leave the country

There were protests outside Khan's house after his remarks

One is the rise of what a commentator calls a "species of hardcore
supporters" of Mr Modi, who are derisively called Modi Bhakts - bhakt
means worshipper of a deity - by liberal opponents.

They are not the fawning, old-fashioned sycophants that India's
leaders are used to. Their identification with Mr Modi goes beyond
mere spirited support, and they defend their leader with a sense of
identification and aggressiveness which is unprecedented in India.
Some of them behave more like his self-appointed intellectual
guardians.

'Conspiracy'
Many of these supporters also believe that the world is out to get Mr
Modi and say people with a history of reservations against him - Khan
had condemned the 2002 Gujarat riots - have not been able to reconcile
themselves to Mr Modi becoming prime minister.

What accounts for the emergence of the uber supporter? "Maybe, many of
us were looking desperately for a strong leader and when we thought we
had found one and elected him to power, we lost all perspective,"
wonders analyst Pratap Bhanu Mehta.

***Secondly, criticising Mr Modi is increasingly being conflated with
defaming India.*** [Emphasis added.]

Junior Home Minister Kiren Rijiju says Khan's comments on intolerance
"only bring down the image of the country and the prime minister".
This, many believe, follows from rising hyper-nationalism and fragile
self-esteem.

Mohammad Akhlaq was lynched over rumours that he had consumed beef

Many Modi supporters appear to be defining nationalism by the hard,
irreconcilable position of loyalty rather than the values that India
stands for. Mr Modi and his party cannot be entirely blamed for this
worrying trend, which is becoming more glaring as India continues to
frustrate its aspiring millions.

Thirdly - and most disturbingly - is a tendency to tell India's
Muslims that they should be grateful that India is looking after them.

Disguised sectarianism
Bollywood actor Anupam Kher, who is an ardent supporter of Mr Modi,
said Khan should remember that "this country has made you Aamir Khan".
Implicit in such remarks, believe many, is a barely disguised
sectarianism.

BJP chief Amit Shah spoke about crackers being burst in Pakistan if
the BJP lost the recent Bihar elections. (The party suffered a
drubbing, and there were no reports of any such celebrations across
the border.) Senior party leader Giriraj Singh openly said that "those
opposed to Mr Modi should go to Pakistan".

"There is a sense among the practitioners of majoritarian politics in
the ruling party of creating a fantasy world of politics where Muslims
don't matter. Also, now prejudice can be expressed without describing
somebody as Muslim," says Mr Mehta.

But there is hope.
***Far away from the shrill echo chamber of social media, the majority
of Indians have proved to be calmer and more sceptical. The results of
the recent Bihar election are a good example of that.*** [Emphasis
added.]

Critics say Mr Modi's government needs to realise that silence and
inaction can breed anxiety.

***There were a number of federal ministers present when Khan made his
remarks at an awards ceremony on Tuesday. Many wondered why Arun
Jaitley, the senior-most minister in the audience, did not stand up
and say he understood the actor's anxiety and that his government
would guarantee that every Indian, irrespective of his belief, was
safe?*** [Emphasis added.]

***Why are Mr Modi and his ministers not articulating some of these
elementary things?*** [Emphasis added.]
-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to