[On the face of it, therefore Modi's dramatic strategy is unlikely to
deliver. A more sustained engagement with Pakistan without hyperbolic
gestures may help the two countries understand each other's concerns
and interests better.
Relationships that have been bombed virtually beyond repair need to be
rebuilt slowly, steadily and with sustained effort without raising
hopes of a final resolution because of the personal charisma of a
leader.]

http://www.catchnews.com/international-news/modisharif-enjoy-the-bonhomie-but-don-t-expect-anything-more-1451211324.html

#ModiSharif: Enjoy the bonhomie. But don't expect anything more
BHARAT BHUSHAN @bharatitis |27 December 2015

Stopover
Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Lahore stopover had won him lots of accolades
The Indian PM was there on Pak PM Nawaz Sharif's birthday
Indo-Pak ties
If Indo-Pak ties improve Modi can take credit
Even if nothing changes he can say 'I tried'
Collaterally too there can be gains

More in the story
Why the visit is good tactics but not sound strategy
Will Modi's personal charisma be enough to change anything?

The sudden stopover in Lahore en route from Kabul to Delhi was typical
of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's penchant for showmanship. He has
rightly been called India's first 'Bollywood Prime Minister' -
everything is carefully scripted, meant to be publicly noticed and
applauded.

Aware of Modi's need for appreciation, Home Minister Rajnath Singh has
described him as a "harbinger of innovative diplomacy" and claimed
that "no one in the world had ever seen diplomacy like this." If he
was not being plainly sycophantic, this means that the Home Minister
whose core mandate is to deal with terrorism was not in the picture at
all.

Ever since he assumed office, Modi has taken India on an emotional
roller-coaster ride by breathing hot and cold about Pakistan. In
either case, he provides no explanation for his actions but seeks
appreciation. He wants the people to go into a frenzy both when he
thumps his apocryphal 56-inch chest taking a muscular stand on
Pakistan as well as when he projects himself as a peacenik walking
hand in hand with Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif as his
long-lost buddy.

Also read: #ModiSharif: Mines, bonds & the Sajjan Jindal card in
Indo-Pak relations

Like Bollywood which seeks to entertain for a few hours, it is quite
likely that the Lahore bonhomie of Prime Minister Modi has only
tactical aims. Strategically, it may change little.

Sure shots
His move will undoubtedly deny Pakistan the brownie points
internationally by claiming that India was obdurate while it was ready
to talk. It will also prevent Modi's friend "Barak" from breathing
down his neck as the United States was pressing India to restart
dialogue with Pakistan.

The Lahore stopover also has the advantage of projecting Modi as
someone with the ability to change the optics of the India-Pakistan
relations. If the atmospherics result in a constructive dialogue, he
will get credit and his stature would be enhanced.

Since Modi is very keen on attending the 19th SAARC summit in
Islamabad in July 2016, he would not want anything to mar his visit.
His Lahore foray can help prepare the ground for the visit. The Modi
machine must already be preparing for a grand show in Islamabad to
outmatch Atal Bihari Vajapyee's visit for a similar summit in January
2004.

Since there are no non-resident Indian crowds in Pakistan to attend
his trademark rock-star shows, he has to think innovatively to outdo
the Vajpayee visit which resulted in a commitment - honoured more in
the breach subsequently - that Pakistan would not allow area under its
control to be used for terrorism against India.

Also possible
By improving the optics with Pakistan further collateral advantage may
be had in the Uttar Pradesh Assembly election due in 2017. If it is
true - and this is by no means an established truth - that Muslims in
North India tend to be well-disposed towards parties that improve ties
with Pakistan, then some sections of the community may swing towards
the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

Also read: Measure of the Man: why Modi loves hoopla

There are a large number of divided families in UP who place primacy
on normal ties with Pakistan so that cross-border visits become
easier. Whether the BJP will indeed become more acceptable to the
voters in the state, who have been the target of its communalism up to
now, remains to be seen.

Legacy Modi
Finally, it is quite possible that Modi may also have begun to think
in legacy terms. The first indication of this was his speech to the
Navy Commanders' conference on INS Vikramaditya where he declared that
he was "engaging Pakistan to try and turn the course of history".

Indian Prime Ministers while in office tend to assume that their
initiative and the sheer power of their personality are sufficient to
change the trajectory of India-Pakistan relations. Modi believes that
he can pick up the threads of India-Pakistan relations from where
Vajpayee had left off.

If he succeeds where the former Prime Minister failed his image would
get a massive boost; he would prove his critics wrong and, who knows,
he may then even be looking at the prospect of a Nobel Peace Prize.

Modi's new found warmth towards Pakistan has found support in the
media and the opinion-making classes. There is little doubt that
should he be looking for it, Modi can generate a broad consensus in
the country for peace with Pakistan.

Having grown up politically breathing fire against Pakistan, he knows
that at the end of the day, the ordinary folk in India do not like
threats of war; that they recognise that without a dialogue with
Pakistan there cannot be a compromise on any outstanding issue. Also,
they know that a dialogue does not mean that India has let go of its
interests.

State & Army
There is also belief in some sections of the policy-making
establishment in India that while Nawaz Sharif is well intentioned, it
is the Pakistan Army which is villainous when it comes to forging
peace with India. Thus the arguments that the Pakistan Army did not
want Sharif to come for Modi's swearing-in ceremony and that the
appointment of a former military officer Lt. Gen (R) Naseer Khan
Janjua as Pakistan's National Security Advisor suggests that this time
around the Pak Army was on board for initiating peace with India.

Also read: Modi-Sharif meet: Lahore visit was neither a coup nor a surprise

Without appreciating the role of the army in Pakistan's neighbourhood
policy, they dream of either minimising the military's influence in
India-Pakistan dialogue or hoped it will not act as a spoiler.

The insurance
If, however, things were to go terribly wrong with his assumptions
about Pakistan, Modi still has the option of falling back on a
hardline position.

He could then claim that he made several efforts with Pakistan - in
Kathmandu, in Ufa, in Paris and even in Lahore - but the Pakistanis
are an incorrigible lot.

>From his perspective then, he is engaging in safe gestures with no
immediate downside.

Necessary scepticism
To claim that Modi's diplomacy is path breaking is to ignore how far
Vajpayee and Manmohan Singh had gone with Pakistan, despite the
terrorist attack on Indian Parliament and the Kargil War. Even then,
we witnessed the Mumbai terror attacks.

India then went so far as to separate acts of terrorism from a
dialogue with Pakistan, but to no avail. Pakistan, in fact, changed
the discourse on terrorism and claimed that India was behind terrorist
acts in Pakistan.

Also read: Twitter takes on TOI's epic-length headline. Hilarity ensues

After one discounts the hoopla around the 'engineered spontaneity' of
the Lahore visit, one might wonder whether there is indeed a downside
to it. The question is: How would Modi's actions be viewed in Pakistan
and would there be any change in Pakistan's attitude in the long run?

The new optics suggest that India had been wrong all along and it has
now come to the right path, realizing that it needs to take corrective
measures, behave better and walk hand-in-hand with Pakistan. The Modi
establishment, up to now, had been telling the Indian people that the
ground reality was exactly the opposite.

Are the Pakistanis going to be taken in by the engineered birthday
bonhomie? They would wonder what Modi's motivations are. They will
monitor whether the nature of India's retaliation on the Line of
Control has changed from the threatened disproportionate response or
the tit-for-tat responses of India's intelligence agencies (India is
accused by Pakistan of fomenting trouble in Balochistan).

If they find that India has indeed stepped back, it is unlikely that
they would think that Modi is approaching them from a position of
strength. They may also conclude that he comes to them at a time when
his popularity is sagging and his stature has been eroded after the
Delhi and Bihar poll debacles.

The trappings
In the medium and the long term, neither Pakistan's nor India's
interests are going to change fundamentally. Pakistan would always
want to put Kashmir on the front burner and settle Siachen. Both are
tricky issues for any Indian Prime Minister, given the entrenched
Indian position on Kashmir and on giving up or weakening the Indian
Army's position on Siachen, which is totally under Indian control.
Retreating on either will be particularly difficult for a BJP Prime
Minister.

Similarly, Pakistan is unlikely to give India any satisfaction on the
26/11 trials, curbing the activities of Hafiz Saeed or acting against
terrorist organisations in Punjab like Lashkar-e-Tayyeba. The Pakistan
Army and the terrorist groups in Pakistan's Punjab recruit from the
same areas and communities.

Targeting them could create internal strife and the Pakistani
political leadership itself might become a target. Therefore, it is
very difficult for the political leadership to act on the basics of
terrorism against India.

No big deal
***On the face of it, therefore Modi's dramatic strategy is unlikely
to deliver. A more sustained engagement with Pakistan without
hyperbolic gestures may help the two countries understand each other's
concerns and interests better.*** [Emphasis added.]

***Relationships that have been bombed virtually beyond repair need to
be rebuilt slowly, steadily and with sustained effort without raising
hopes of a final resolution because of the personal charisma of a
leader.*** [Emphasis added.]

Also read: When the going gets tough, the tough get going: Salman Khurshid
-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to