http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/bsf-finds-no-sign-of-how-pathankot-attackers-entered/

BSF finds no sign of how Pathankot attackers entered

A failure to detect the terrorists’ tracks was seen in the Dinanagar
attack of July 2015 as well. The investigation in that attack, in
which four policemen and three civilians were killed, has not made
much headway.

Written by Deeptiman Tiwary | New Delhi | Updated: January 17, 2016 7:43 am

The investigation in that [Dinanagar] attack, in which four policemen
and three civilians were killed, has not made much headway.

A BSF team seeking to establish how the Pathankot attackers entered
Punjab has found no breach in the fence along the border with
Pakistan, nor any sign of infiltration through rivers or nullahs. It
has found no tunnel — and no evidence either that the terrorists came
from Jammu and Kashmir.

A failure to detect the terrorists’ tracks was seen in the Dinanagar
attack of July 2015 as well. The investigation in that attack, in
which four policemen and three civilians were killed, has not made
much headway.

The team, led by a DIG-level officer, is likely to submit its report
to BSF D-G D K Pathak next week. Pathak will subsequently apprise the
Home Ministry of the findings. The D-G formed the team on January 7
after tell-tale signs such as Pakistani shoe marks were found in a
field in a border village.

Sources said the team has combed the entire length of the Punjab
border, and especially the northern stretch close to the Jammu border.
“No breach has been found anywhere in the fences in Punjab or in
Jammu.

At the over 150 gaps along the two borders, there no signs of anyone
having crossed over. Almost all gaps in the Jammu border, and
vulnerable gaps in the Punjab border, are covered by digital video
recorders and thermal imaging cameras. No evidence of infiltration was
found,” said an official privy to the team’s findings.

A preliminary investigation carried out by a team led by the D-G
himself had produced similar results. Pathak had inspected a 20-km
stretch on either side of Bamial village, where the terrorists were
suspected to have entered, immediately after the attack, and found
nothing amiss. Pathak had communicated his findings to Home Secretary
Rajiv Mehrishi.

However, to ensure a thorough investigation, a special team was formed
to go over the entire length of the border closely.

“The problem is that the terrorists were not carrying any GPS with
them, which could have provided clues to their route. It may now take
months to figure out, with evidence, exactly how and where they
entered. It is a setback; it is necessary to know this in order to
take preventive steps,” a BSF officer said.

There are reasons to believe the terrorists crossed over in Punjab.
Besides the footprints in the field five and a half kilometres from
the Bamial outpost, the abduction of SP Salwinder Singh and murder of
taxi driver Ikagar Singh also took place near the border in Punjab.

Immediately after the attack, the BSF sent a report to the Home
Ministry detailing the steps it had taken to fortify the north Punjab
border after the Dinanagar attack, along with the possible lapses in
the Pathankot incident, based on preliminary findings.

The BSF said that post-Dinanagar, it had deputed as many as nine
companies of the force around Bamial, and covered the riverine gaps
with cameras and floodlights. Some gaps also have laser walls
connected to an alarm system.

The report pointed out the vulnerability of the gaps to infiltration.
Sources said the force has been in touch with the Ministry on
strengthening the counter-infiltration grid along the Punjab border.

-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to