http://scroll.in/article/808293/disowned-by-their-own-the-disturbing-pattern-about-the-murders-of-independent-journalists

MEDIA MATTERS

Disowned by their own: The disturbing pattern about the murders of
independent journalists

When stringers are attacked or killed, the struggle for justice begins
with determining whether they are journalists at all.

Yesterday · 01:00 pm

Geeta Seshu

Last week, television journalist Akhilesh Pratap Singh was shot dead
in Chhatra, Jharkhand. Barely than 24 hours later, in neighbouring
Bihar, Hindustan journalist Rajdeo Ranjan was gunned down in Siwan.

The murders have exposed the faultlines in the media, not least the
most basic, which is the ability to access and swiftly disseminate
authentic information.

Journalists scrambled to get information on the two incidents. In the
absence of independent information, political parties quickly stepped
in and traded allegations on the breakdown of law and order in
Bharatiya Janata Party-ruled Jharkhand and Bihar, where the Rashtriya
Janata Dal is part of the coalition government.

Meanwhile, five days on, no clear motives have emerged with regard to
either of the killings.

Political games

Three journalists have been murdered in India this year. On February
13, Karun Mishra, the bureau chief of newspaper Jan Sandesh was shot
dead by unidentified persons in Sultanpur, Uttar Pradesh. Five days
after the incident, Chief Minister Akhilesh Yadav ordered a probe and
police arrested five persons from the mining mafia.

Akhilesh Singh, locally known as Indradev Yadav, was a journalist with
a news channel. Unidentified persons gunned him down at Dewaria in
Chatra district of Jharkhand that borders Bihar and where a faction of
a Maoist group called the Tritiya Prastuti Committee is active. The
group, police said, indulges in extortion of money for petty
contractors and local businessmen.

On Monday, police claimed a breakthrough in the case, arresting two
persons. On Tuesday, a third person – Suraj Sao, the aide of BJP MLA
Ganesh Ganjhu – was detained. The police said the journalist also took
up civic works on contract and was killed over a dispute with members
of the TMC and the MLA’s aide over the levy of money to be paid in
exchange for a contract awarded to him. The police have discounted the
involvement of the MLA in the killing.

But less than a day later, when news came in of the murder of Rajdeo
Ranjan, the BJP were quick to denounce the “Jungle Raj” in Bihar.

In March, a photograph of jailed RJD leader Mohammad Shahabuddin
sharing snacks with Bihar minister Abdul Ghafoor inside Siwan jail
went viral. Rajdeo Ranjan was reportedly behind the leak. According to
BJP leader and former Bihar chief minister Sushil Kumar Modi, Ranjan’s
murder was revenge.

While police are still investigating the charge, Ranjan’s wife Asha
Yadav has gone on record to say that her husband was killed for a
series of news reports against Shahabuddin's interests. She further
claimed that Ranjan figured on Shahabuddin’s “hit list”, which police
were privy to at least two years ago. Fellow journalists were divided
on these claims, but said there was definitely more to the murder than
meets the eye.

On Monday, Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar announced a Central
Bureau of Investigation probe into Ranjan’s death, even as the motive
for his murder remains unclear.

Existing gulf

Almost every time a journalist is murdered in India – 29 since media
watch website The Hoot began tracking free speech violations in 2010 –
there is the involvement of politicians or local business people or
the oil, timber and sand mafias, or those involved in illegal felling
of forests, land grabbing, exploiting child labour, chit fund scams,
or even cases of medical negligence.

By now, that’s a given.

It’s after the killing that a pattern quickly emerges. When
journalists are attacked or killed, the struggle for justice begins
with determining whether they are journalists at all, whether they
died for their journalism and not owing to any “personal” dispute or
business links. Before the crucial questions of who killed them and
why can be asked, the case is over.

There currently exists a gulf between the journalists employed on
contract in mainstream media and journalists such as Ranjan, who work
independently or are associated as stringers with local or national
newspapers and broadcast channels. Unprotected and unorganised, the
plight of journalists in the regional media is much more precarious.

While the nexus between local politicians and business interests is
hardly surprising, what is disturbing is the role of media houses in
refusing to acknowledge these footsoldiers. Often, the mainstream
media publications they may work for or contribute regularly to, may
wash their hands of them, denying completely – even in the face of
incontrovertible evidence – their employment, that they worked for
them or had anything to do with them.

The dirty secret in the media is the manner in which journalists are
constrained to work as advertising agents too. Often, the commissions
they earn from advertising may be more than their salaries, points out
senior journalist and media analyst Anil Chamadia, who worked for
years in Bihar before he shifted to Delhi to set up a media watch
organisation, People’s Media Group.

Discredited as journalists for working as advertising agents, they
occupy a grey zone in an already fractured mediascape. It becomes far
easier to isolate and target them when their journalistic reports
ruffle the feathers of local power centres, politicians and
businessfolk. Shooting these messengers of unsavoury and unflattering
information, who refuse to remain plaint and push invisible
boundaries, also serves another purpose – it will silence others as
well.

Those responsible also know that they can get away with it. They can
easily prevail upon local police and administration to drag their feet
in the investigation. Is it any wonder that demands are now routinely
made for a CBI probe in almost every instance? Invariably, the poor
investigation, compounded by interminable trials, end up in
acquittals. In all the killings of journalists so far, there has not
been a single conviction.

And the struggle to secure some justice for their killings, left to
family members or colleagues, becomes a long and solitary battle.

Geeta Seshu is Consulting Editor of the mediawatch website, The Hoot.
-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to