[India securing a membership of the NSG would have been a significant marker of its emergence as a global power. While it'd have had little, if at all any, impact on the prospects of import of nuclear technology, fuel and equipment - in 2008 itself India was granted a unique waiver on imports, it'd have conceivably facilitated India's bid to emerge as an exporter.
Moreover, India would have got to block Pakistan's entry therein in the foreseeable future. On top of that, India would have been able to avert any censure by the NSG, let alone sanction, in case of a future nuclear explosion, by India, or such other aberrant conduct as all decisions in the NSG have to be based on consensus. As the things stand, India has, in a big way, failed in its bid.] http://m.thehindu.com/news/nsg-membership-push-illadvised-unwarranted-srinivasan/article8772903.ece NSG membership push “ill-advised, unwarranted”: Srinivasan Updated: June 25, 2016 14:55 IST | PTI The Padma Bhushan awardee said failure to get in NSG would not have adverse impact on India’s nuclear programme. Noted scientist and Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) member M R Srinivasan on Saturday said the Centre’s push to gain Nuclear Suppliers Group membership was “unnecessary, unwarranted and ill-advised”, a day after India failed in its bid to clinch membership of the 48—member club. The AEC, a body under the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE), would have advised the government to desist from such a move had it been consulted, he said. Mr. Srinivasan, a former Chairman of the AEC, which looks after atomic energy activities in the country, argued that NSG membership does not make a difference to India’s nuclear commerce as New Delhi has signed agreements with other countries for supply of reactors and uranium. “Unnecessarily, India made a big hype about this admission into the NSG. It was completely unnecessary because the 2008 waiver was already enabling us to have nuclear commerce with nuclear advanced countries and we already have agreements with Russia, France and the United States for reactor projects...,” he said in an interview to PTI on Saturday. India also has uranium buying agreement with multiple countries, including Kazakhstan, Canada and Australia, Mr. Srinivasan noted, adding it was an “unwarranted and ill-advised initiative” to seek entry into the group of nuclear-supplier countries set up in 1974. The Padma Bhushan awardee said failure to get in NSG would not have adverse impact on India’s nuclear programme as New Delhi has its own capability “for designing and building reactors and fuel manufacturing, reprocessing and so on.” “On the ground, it won’t make any difference [on failure to get NSG membership]. We already have a waiver. We are already having cooperation with important countries and countries who are able to supply uranium. There was no need for us to subject ourselves to embarrassment. Unfortunately, our [India’s] self-esteem has been dented [with this failure],” the well-known 86-year-old nuclear scientist said. “[Had] the matter been initially brought to the Atomic Energy Commission, [of] which I am still a member, and if they [the Government] had asked if we [the Government] should proceed with this issue [seeking NSG entry], I would have said the same thing —— ‘don’t raise the issue’,” he said. “But it was not brought to the Atomic Energy Commission. It’s unfortunate. It was thought to be the preserve of Foreign Office...Ministry of External Affairs...I do not know. Needless drama [India’s diplomatic push on NSG membership] has gone on for a number of days,” he said. -- Peace Is Doable -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
