http://scroll.in/article/810810/why-five-gay-indians-want-the-supreme-court-to-admit-a-new-petition-against-section-377-today

LGBT RIGHTS

Risking prosecution, five gay Indians ask Supreme Court to quash law
that criminalises homosexuality

Their petition claims that Section 377 violates the basic
Constitutional right to life and personal liberty.

7 hours ago
Updated 7 hours ago

Aarefa Johari

In December 2013, while reading a Supreme Court verdict upholding the
constitutional validity of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code,
Justice GS Singhvi reportedly remarked that he had “never met a gay
person”.

That remark was one of the reasons why five homosexual Indians – all
prominent names in the fields of art, culture and business – have
filed a writ petition in the Supreme Court seeking the quashing of
Section 377, a law that criminalises any form of “unnatural” sex.

Previous petitions against Section 377 have been filed by either
non-profit organisations, medical professionals or relatives of gay
people. But the petitioners in this latest case have chosen to speak
up directly as aggrieved members of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and
Transgender community, who believe that Section 377 violates their
fundamental right to life and liberty and renders them “criminals in
their own country”.

The five petitioners have had illustrious careers: Navtej Singh Johar
is a Sangeet Natak Akademi award-winning Bharatnatyam dancer, Sunil
Mehra is a senior journalist, Ritu Dalmia is a chef and restaurateur,
Aman Nath is the founder of the Neemrana chain of hotels and Ayesha
Kapur is a businesswoman. Their petition also makes it a point to
mention that Johar and Mehra have been in a committed relationship for
almost 20 years and live together.

“We would be abdicating a moral responsibility if we didn’t file this
petition at this point in time,” said Mehra.

The petition was originally filed in April and at a preliminary
hearing on June 29, a two-judge bench of the Supreme Court will decide
whether to admit the plea or not.

‘Sexuality an inherent characteristic’

In 2009, the Delhi High Court admitted a plea by non-profit Naz
Foundation and deemed Section 377 as unconstitutional and violative of
the rights of consenting adults from the LGBT community. This landmark
judgement wasn’t to stand long – in 2013, while hearing appeals
against the Delhi High Court verdict, the Supreme Court upheld Section
377 as constitutional and effectively recriminalised homosexuality. A
curative petition against this judgement was admitted in the apex
court this February and is yet to be heard by a five-judge bench.

In the midst of this, the latest writ petition by Mehra, Johar and the
others is likely to give a boost to the legal battle against an
obsolete law.

While pleading to the court to quash Section 377, the petition seeks a
declaration that Article 21 of the Constitution – which guarantees the
right to life and personal liberty – also encompasses the right to
“sexuality, sexual autonomy and choice of sexual partner”. It makes a
simple comparison to inter-caste and inter-community marriages that
the Court has protected on numerous occasions in the past, while
asserting that sexuality is an “intrinsic, inherent and immutable
characteristic of any human being” that must be protected rather than
criminalised or stigmatised.

“The Petitioners are not, therefore, seeking protection only as sexual
minorities but seeking recognition of sexual characteristics that
inhere in all human beings,” the petition says. “The petitioners
cannot overcome a lurking fear that their consensual relationships,
even within the privacy of their homes, may invite coercive state
action at the hands of a busybody, rival, political party or any 3rd
party who...is motivated only by malice/prejudice.”

‘A moral responsibility’

Speaking out directly and openly as homosexuals is a significant step
in the fight for LGBT rights, as the petitioners risk being persecuted
and prosecuted under Section 377 itself.

But for Mehra, the decision to speak up is rooted squarely in a sense
of ethical responsibility at a time when minorities of all kinds are
increasingly being marginalised in Indian society.

“We are seeing the rabid, deliberate, agenda-based marginalisation of
all minorities, and given this socio-political environment it is our
responsibility to act,” said Mehra. “We must remember that the Bharat
Mata Ki Jai movement didn’t begin with [Mohammed] Akhlaq, it ended
there – in the same vein that marginalisation of Jewish minorities
[during World War II] ended with the gassing of millions at Auschwitz
and Dachau.”

Mehra sees his petition as a follow-up to the pleas filed by
organisations like Naz Foundation. Petitioning as five individuals,
Mehra believes, adds a human dimension to the fight for the rights of
sexual minorities. “The petition is not so much about sexuality but
about constitutionality – about the right to live, to be, to love –
which is a right, not a favour,” he said. “And it is granted by the
Indian Constitution to every Indian citizen.”



-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to