http://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/pm-narendra-modi-salman-khurshid-balochistan-kashmir-2979450/

Adventurism on I-Day

Linking PoK with Balochistan is a myopic move, could undermine India’s
high moral ground vis a vis Pakistan.

Written by Salman Khurshid | Published:August 17, 2016 12:02 am

Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the Red Fort on the 70th Independence
Day in New Delhi. (Express Photo by Renuka Puri)

The speech by India’s prime minister from the ramparts of Red Fort on
Independence Day is meant to be different from the usual town hall
events in contemporary politics. More than anything, it is a moment
for raising national sentiment to the level of the “freedom at
midnight” speech of Jawaharlal Nehru. Of course, there are elements
that show concern for the life of the common citizen, but unlike other
speeches it is an expression of lofty aspirations and accomplishments,
a statement of India’s view of the world. It is neither a manifesto
nor a performance-report to the nation and certainly not a partisan
election oration. However, Prime Minister Narendra Modi seems
unwilling to see it as a national event rather than an opportunity to
enthuse party cadres. He certainly did a commendable job of the
latter, though he seems to have missed the former completely.

Foreign policy is an apt subject for a Red Fort speech. But PM Modi
preferred not to venture across the globe he trots often and placed
his focus on Pakistan. We have enough cause for concern about Pakistan
rudely and obdurately seeking to interfere in our internal matters,
not to mention continuing to provoke and support heinous terrorist
attacks on our citizens. The PM had little of substance to say about
that beyond parroting general phrases of indignation. He refrained
from telling the world how his attempts at outreach have been
repudiated and what, if any, promises to him have been broken.

There must have been many promises that he procured during several of
his smug meetings with the Pakistan PM. He did not say that he was
being forced to change over to Plan C (Plan A was before getting
elected, Plan B after becoming PM). But he abruptly launched a
PoK-Gilgit-Balochistan verbal assault to the immediate cheers of
uninformed jingoists across the electronic and social media.

The prompt refrain one heard was: “Thou shall not question the PM on
pain of being called anti-national.” I understand the sensitivity of
questioning the PM on Independence Day but that never stopped him from
making competing speeches when he was only a prime ministerial
aspirant. Be that as it may, given the impudence of Pakistan on the
tragic events in the Valley and the insistence on interfering, our
PM’s riposte on PoK was apt and justified. PoK (including Gilgit)
remain part of India forcibly occupied by Pakistan. Our Parliament has
unanimously resolved to get it back long before Modi was heard of. Of
course, PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee had different ideas when he tried to
find a solution with President Musharraf. Be that as it may, PoK is
and must be a priority even if the practical ground situation might be
favourable to Kashmir politicians in 1948 as indeed now. No one will
have the slightest hesitation in supporting the PM’s statement (even
if as a bargaining issue). But speaking of Balochistan is quite
another matter.

We all know that there is a Baloch struggle for freedom of
considerable vintage and with a history of ruthless oppression by the
state. We have been repeatedly accused of supporting it and we have
forcefully rejected that. When at Sharm el Sheikh, to break a
deadlock, we agreed to consider any legitimate concerns, the BJP
raised a howl of protest and stalled Parliament. Now the PM has
virtually announced support for the Baloch struggle though he has
refrained from saying how he intends to do it.

That will need to factor in several dimensions: The Chinese presence
in Balochistan, including development of the Gwadar port; the Chinese
Economic Corridor from Gwadar to PoK and beyond; the Afghan and
Iranian reaction, given that their territories are included in the
Baloch aspiration.

It is not surprising that Baloch dissidents have grasped India’s hand.
There is no reason why we should not feel their pain as we do for
people elsewhere. But to link that with PoK/Kashmir at the present
juncture is a myopic move that might seriously undermine the high
moral ground we have always held on Pakistani interference in our
internal matters. Not only does this also give the go-by to Panchsheel
principles but it also makes us vulnerable to international concern
that we have successfully warded away over the past decades. The world
has fortunately moved away from the redrawing of boundaries and it is
silly for us to invite them to do so for Balochistan with no certainty
that it will stop there.
While we grapple with the larger question on the situation beyond our
border and the LoC, we can hardly play ostrich at home. More than 40
days of curfew in J&K and a depressingly long list of casualties with
dozens of young persons fighting to save their eyes, faces pockmarked
with pellets, and the government has nothing to say or do. Bad as
sentiments are in the Valley, it has not helped that the PDP has
become a helpless puppet in the hands of RSS functionaries posted in
the state. All that we get in answer to questions about the intent to
solve or resolve the stand-off are some patriotic exhortations and the
blame game from 60 years of misrule.

Any concern for the misguided youth pelting stones in the streets is
sadly seen as insensitivity for the brave young men in uniform who
find themselves in a situation not of their making. The killing of
Burhan Wani reminds us that killing a man is easy but killing a legend
impossible. Yet we have to think of the living rather than one who
chose his path of death. We have to win these hearts at home in the
Valley, not in the harsh mountains of Balochistan. But the divisive
agenda is already entrenched when differences on fighting the enemy
are turned into a bloody political slugfest at home. Were we promised
such an independence?

The writer is a senior Congress leader and former minister for external affairs



-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to