https://www.thequint.com/currency-ban/2016/11/18/the-currency-ban-is-not-backed-by-the-law-indira-jaising-ordinance-500-1000-note-1978-pm-modi-bjp-rbi

Indira Jaising argues that demonetisation of Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 notes
is not entirely legal. (Photo Courtesy: Facebook/Indira Jaising)

The Currency Ban Is Not Backed by the Law, Says Indira Jaising
Maanvi
Yesterday, 3:31 pm

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s decision to ban Rs 500 and Rs 1,000
wasn’t backed by law, writes Indira Jaising in an insightful column
published in National Herald. The former Additional Solicitor General
of India and senior advocate has questioned the legality of the
decision on the basis of the following three points:

Snaoshot

1. The RBI Act allows the government to withdraw a ‘series’ of a
particular currency, not the entire denomination.
2. By failing to introduce an ordinance or passing a law in
Parliament, the government had failed to justify the removal of
“movable property”, which in this case are the Rs 500 and Rs 1,000
notes belonging to the citizens.
3. There is no law or rule under the RBI Act which disallows a citizen
from accessing his/her taxed money. This is in reference to Rs 2,000
withdrawal limit.--
Peace Is Doable

Can Remove a “Series” of Notes, Not the Entire Denomination

Demonetisation of 500 and 1,000 rupee notes by an executive fiat
appears to a first of its kind procedure and raises fundamental
questions on the authority and jurisdiction of the executive to do
what the legislature has not permitted.
Indira Jaising in the National Herald article

Deprivation of Property Can Only be Done by Law
Jaising also questions the legal authority of demonetisation through
Article 300A, which states that “No person can be deprived of his
property except by authority of law.”

So, demonetisation implies extinguishing public debt in the hands of
someone who has a demonetised note, which cannot be done without the
authority of law.

Why Wasn’t an Ordinance Enacted?

Citing the 1978 demonetisation, Jaising asks why the current
government did not introduce the note ban through an Ordinance. She
argues that one possibility could be the reluctance of the government
to debate the issue in Parliament.

(The piece quoted here was originally published in the National Herald
on 18 November 2016 and can be accessed here.)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to