[The gag rule will, however, lead to more women dying across the
developing world. Marie Stopes International, a major global family
planning organization, estimates that without alternative funding, the
loss of its services alone will cause 6.5 million unintended
pregnancies, 2.2 million abortions, 2.1 million unsafe abortions, and
21,700 maternal deaths just in Trump’s first term, from 2017 to 2020.
The organization says it will also be prevented from reaching 1.5
million women with contraception every year.
...
The gag rule hurts not just abortion access, not just contraception
access, but other forms of health care as well, Rucks said. In many
developing countries, women get reproductive health care at the same
place they get all of their other care. So when health care providers
lose funds due to the gag rule, it slashes funding and causes nurses
to be laid off for all health care services the provider offers.]

http://www.vox.com/identities/2017/1/23/14356582/trump-global-gag-rule-abortion

Trump just reinstated the global gag rule. It won't stop abortion, but
it will make it less safe.
Thousands of women will die across the world, and millions will lose
access to both safe abortion and birth control.

Updated by Emily Crockett@[email protected]  Jan 23, 2017, 2:00pm EST

Photo by Warrick Page/Getty Images

President Donald Trump reinstated an executive order Monday barring US
foreign aid from going to any nongovernmental organization (NGO) that
either provides abortion services, or even discusses abortion with its
patients as an option for family planning.

A statement from Population Action International (PAI), a global
family planning advocacy organization, called the move to reinstate
the so-called global gag rule, “the beginning of the Trump-Pence
administration’s agenda to punish women everywhere.”

Trump has promised to take sweeping actions against abortion,
including appointing Supreme Court justices who would overturn Roe v.
Wade. Reinstating the global gag rule is the first indication of how
serious he is.

The global gag rule has become something of a political seesaw since
Ronald Reagan first implemented it in 1984 at a United Nations
population conference in Mexico City (which is why it’s also called
the “Mexico City policy”). Bill Clinton repealed it immediately when
he took office. George W. Bush immediately reinstated it when he took
office. Then Barack Obama immediately repealed.

But the effects of reinstating the gag rule now — especially after
eight years of the Obama administration, which supported sexual and
reproductive health in foreign aid — will be nothing like a seesaw. It
will be very messy, advocates say, with ripple effects and unintended
consequences that will have devastating effects on the health of women
and girls around the globe. And while it will export the US abortion
wars overseas, only foreign women will be the casualties.

“Trump’s global gag rule will obstruct and destroy the work of health
care providers who are often women’s main — and sometimes only —
source for reproductive health care, and their entry point for
receiving a wide range of primary health care services,” said Suzanne
Ehlers, president and CEO of PAI, in a statement.

The gag rule does wide-ranging damage to women’s health abroad
The global gag rule goes much further than simply banning US foreign
aid from paying for abortions directly — which is already the law, and
which has its own detrimental consequences for women.

Instead, the gag rule tries to control how international organizations
use their own funds, raised from other sources. Just like Republican
efforts to defund Planned Parenthood in the United States, it’s an
attempt to stop abortion from happening by forcing organizations that
provide it to make a choice: stop providing or promoting abortion, or
lose the large amounts of funding that you get from the US government
to support your other medical services.

The reality is simple and brutal. Reinstating the global gag rule will
not reduce abortions. Sub-Saharan Africa, for instance, had higher
abortion rates after George W. Bush reinstated the gag rule, because
it reduced women’s access to contraception and caused more unwanted
pregnancies, which women then chose to terminate.

View image on Twitter
View image on Twitter
 Follow
 Charles Kenny @charlesjkenny
SSA countries more reliant on USAID for reproductive health saw big
rise in abortions after 2001 global gag rule
http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/89/12/11-091660/en/ …
1:02 AM - 24 Jan 2017
  80 80 Retweets   57 57 likes

***The gag rule will, however, lead to more women dying across the
developing world. Marie Stopes International, a major global family
planning organization, estimates that without alternative funding, the
loss of its services alone will cause 6.5 million unintended
pregnancies, 2.2 million abortions, 2.1 million unsafe abortions, and
21,700 maternal deaths just in Trump’s first term, from 2017 to 2020.
The organization says it will also be prevented from reaching 1.5
million women with contraception every year.*** [Emphasis added.]

Studies conducted by PAI have shown that every time the global gag
rule returns, more women in developing countries bear unwanted
pregnancies, die or become disabled due to unsafe abortions, or lose
crucial medical care.

Large international family planning organizations like Marie Stopes
International and the International Planned Parenthood Federation have
been able to bring crucial contraceptive services to areas like West
Africa that were poorly served before, PAI director of advocacy
Jonathan Rucks said. With the gag rule back in effect, large
geographic areas may simply lose services, including birth control.

That’s because those large organizations aren’t going to simply stop
offering abortion care or counseling worldwide, and so they will lose
USAID (United States Agency for International Development) funding as
a result.

"Marie Stopes International knows that safe abortion is a vital
component of women’s reproductive healthcare, and therefore we cannot
agree to these conditions,” read a statement from the organization in
response to Trump’s executive order.

***The gag rule hurts not just abortion access, not just contraception
access, but other forms of health care as well, Rucks said. In many
developing countries, women get reproductive health care at the same
place they get all of their other care. So when health care providers
lose funds due to the gag rule, it slashes funding and causes nurses
to be laid off for all health care services the provider offers.***
[Emphasis added.]

And the rule has both direct and indirect consequences, Rucks told
Vox. Because the Obama administration had such supportive sexual and
reproductive health policies, the United States was able to partner
with other donor governments, like the United Kingdom and Sweden, that
also support reproductive freedom. But those governments “won't be as
likely to want to pool funds with us” for international aid if the
Trump administration implements such negative and harmful policies,
Rucks said.

The gag rule isn’t the only US policy that has this overall effect.
But it has earned a reputation among human rights advocates as a
particularly cruel, draconian measure that exists for one purpose
only: appeasing far-right opponents of legal abortion in the United
States.


-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to