[Transparency in political financing will happen when the political
establishment realises that the only way to get out of the shackles of
big and black money is to become open. The government can do this by
revising its affidavit in the Supreme Court to say all political
parties should be under the purview of the RTI Act, thus honouring the
Central Information Commission’s 2013 decision.]

http://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/towards-openness-4504868/

Towards Openness
Budget promises more transparency in poll funding. But why anonymous donors?

Written by Jagdeep S. Chhokar | Published:February 3, 2017 12:16 am

Transparency in political financing will happen when the political
establishment realises that the only way to get out of the shackles of
big and black money is to become open.

The 2017-18 Union budget had an unusual feature, a section titled
“Transparency in Electoral Funding”. Many commentators have hailed it
as a positive step. But is it? An interview with Finance Minister Arun
Jaitley in this newspaper is revealing. He stated: “The present system
has failed and we are experimenting with a new system”. The “Key
Features of Budget 2017-2018” put out by the government contain six
statements on transparency in electoral funding. Only two are
action-oriented.

Of the two, the first pertains to a reduction in the limit for cash
donations to Rs 2,000 from Rs 20,000. While it looks like a sizeable
reduction, it is unlikely to have any real impact. Past experience
shows political parties follow the law only in letter and not in
spirit. While the existing law required them to disclose donations of
more than Rs 20,000 each in order to avail the 100 per cent exemption
from income tax, it never forbade them from disclosing donations of
less than Rs 20,000.

The other concern is the disparity between what ordinary citizens are
being exhorted to do and what political parties are being enabled to
do. Ordinary citizens are encouraged to make payments using digital
means. Political parties, on the other hand, are being allowed to
accept donations up to Rs 2,000 in cash. Another point that follows is
curious. It says, “Political parties will be entitled to receive
donations by cheque or digital mode from their donors.” This implies
that earlier, political parties were not entitled to receive donations
by cheque or digital mode.

The second action-oriented point is, “the issuance of electoral bonds
in accordance with a scheme that the Government of India would frame”
and the amendment to the RBI Act to enable this. The details of the
scheme will be known only when it is formulated. But the interview
with the FM offers a clue about what it is likely to be. His statement
reads, “These bonds will be bearer in character to keep the donor
anonymous”. The problem with political financing is that 75-80 per
cent of the declared income of political parties comes from unknown
sources. If the objective of the electoral bond scheme is “to keep the
donor anonymous”, then it seems to be the very antithesis of
transparency.

The last two points, though not action-oriented, do seem to strengthen
the “shadow of doubt”. These are: “Every political party would have to
file its return within the time prescribed in accordance with the
provision of the Income Tax Act” and: “Existing exemption to the
political parties from payment of income tax would be available only
subject to the fulfilment of these conditions.” The first of these has
been in existence since 1979 and the second since 2003. To include
them in a “proposal to cleanse the system of funding of political
parties”, as the FM said in his budget speech, seems an effort to
create a mirage.

***Transparency in political financing will happen when the political
establishment realises that the only way to get out of the shackles of
big and black money is to become open. The government can do this by
revising its affidavit in the Supreme Court to say all political
parties should be under the purview of the RTI Act, thus honouring the
Central Information Commission’s 2013 decision.*** [Emphasis added.]

The writer is former professor, dean, and director in-charge of IIM, Ahmedabad

-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to