[The setting up of “anti-Romeo squads” was an election promise of the
BJP in Uttar Pradesh. They were meant to ostensibly curtail
eve-teasing and provide greater security to women. However, reports
reveal the chilling reality behind the grandstanding: A young woman
and man, out in a rickshaw, going to meet friends to watch a movie
together, were stopped in Lucknow and questioned by the police. The
young woman, interrogated by policewomen, was released after being
given “moral teaching”. The young man was taken to a police station,
questioned further, released after hours.]

I/II.
http://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/editorials/anti-romeo-squads-up-bjp-government-obscene/

Obscene
Police squads checking on couples violate citizens’ rights and
dignity. Is this the New India PM spoke of after UP triumph?

By: Editorial | Published:March 24, 2017 12:40 am

The setting up of “anti-Romeo squads” was an election promise of the
BJP in Uttar Pradesh. They were meant to ostensibly curtail
eve-teasing and provide greater security to women. However, reports
reveal the chilling reality behind the grandstanding: A young woman
and man, out in a rickshaw, going to meet friends to watch a movie
together, were stopped in Lucknow and questioned by the police. The
young woman, interrogated by policewomen, was released after being
given “moral teaching”. The young man was taken to a police station,
questioned further, released after hours.

Thus, at the end of the UP police’s foray that claims to make the
state safer for women — a woman traumatically detained, her friend
harassed, even policemen reportedly admitting that the “anti-Romeo
squad” had no legal jurisdiction to stop the two. If the police can’t
tell the difference between molesters and amicable couples, the squads
portend humiliation, extortion and violence on innocent young people
in public places. Such bullying couldn’t be more out of step today
when, across India, walls between the genders are breaking. More and
more young women are in schools, colleges, workplaces and recreation
spots, frequently with male colleagues, boyfriends, friends who are
boys. The squads picking on such couples will cast a pall of darkness
in public places. They will make it unsafe for women to step out with
men of their choice, inhibit families, foist retrograde notions about
the sexes meeting, and brutally pull back India’s youth into a
shackling medieval repression.

Is this what Prime Minister Narendra Modi was referring to, after the
UP win, when he spoke of a “new India”, where “the dreams of the
under-35s” would materialise? In UP, after his party took over, the
nightmares of the under-35s would appear to be coming true,
threatening to empty malls, coaching centres, etc, of young people
frightened to venture out. UP experienced tumult earlier over “love
jihad”, its new chief minister, Yogi Adityanath, having used the term
to describe mixed-religion marriages as a conversion ploy. Then,
aggression targeted minorities; now, it has expanded to a hatred of
all young people who aspire to an afternoon, an evening, a moment of
togetherness and freedom. PM Modi has spoken about “maximum
governance, minimum government”.

Is this mai-baap sarkar, which accords itself a khap panchayat-like
claim to “moral teaching”, and aims to control young citizens, minimum
government? The weight of this farce could make the PM’s slogans flip,
creating what Shakespeare described in Romeo and Juliet as “a fool’s
paradise”, where young people’s lives “shall pay the forfeit of the
peace.”

II.
[There is always a difference between what they say and what they do.
If you listen to the prime minister’s speeches during elections and
after elections, there is a lot of difference. While the PM was
speaking about Sab ka saath, sab ka vikas at the party office, Yogiji
was targeting a particular community and castes.]

http://indianexpress.com/article/india/being-a-yogi-cm-doesnt-know-difference-between-obscenity-and-family-4584223/

Being a yogi, CM doesn’t know difference between obscenity and family:
Ranjeet Ranjan
Ranjeet Ranjan, Congress, Lok Sabha, speaks to The Indian Express.

Written by Liz Mathew | New Delhi | Updated: March 24, 2017 11:14 pm

You termed the ‘anti-Romeo squads’ unconstitutional. Why?
It is against the fundamental rights of a citizen. There is a lot of
difference between vulgarity or obscenity and a love affair or
friendship. You are putting everything into one category… There have
been instances of a youngster being stopped from going to a movie
together, even brother and sister being stopped from walking together.
How many years would you take India back? Are you saying a girl cannot
have a boyfriend? The chief minister is a yogi, so he does not know
the difference between obscenity and family relations.

What could this lead to?
This could spoil children’s future… Your party has been supported by
youth who could turn against you; you are murdering the democracy that
brought you to power.

If these moves are unpopular, why would a government take them?
I think it comes out of narrow-mindedness. It’s regressive too. It
could be because some people in the Sangh or his own Hindu Yuva Vahini
want it. They don’t want a girl and a boy to walk together even if
they are siblings. I want to ask if this country has become Taliban.
The home minister said the focus of the BJP government in UP will be
welfare for all.
***There is always a difference between what they say and what they
do. If you listen to the prime minister’s speeches during elections
and after elections, there is a lot of difference. While the PM was
speaking about Sab ka saath, sab ka vikas at the party office, Yogiji
was targeting a particular community and castes.*** [Emphasis added.]

You mentioned a crackdown on slaughterhouses, calling it a move
against particular communities.
The government is defending its actions saying it was on their agenda.
Were these the only issues on their agenda – anti Romeo squads and
slaughterhouses? What about loan waiver for farmers? They promised
power, roads and jobs.

-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to