[As Justice Sikri pointed out that there were reports in the
newspapers even on Wednesday about leakage of Aadhaar data, Sengupta
said there could be some errors here and there and ***some IDs were
perhaps issued in the names of ‘Hanuman’ and dogs but UID remains the
most sophisticated and authentic biometric system***. (LOL!)

Sengupta was defending the government’s new law that makes Aadhaar
mandatory for having PAN cards and also for filing Income Tax returns.
He said the legislature was competent to enact Section 139AA, which
was inserted in the Income Tax Act under the Finance Act, 2017.]

http://www.news18.com/news/india/yes-aadhaar-data-were-leaked-centre-to-supreme-court-1390919.html

NEWS18 » INDIA 2-MIN READ

Yes, Aadhaar Data Were Leaked: Centre to Supreme Court

Utkarsh Anand | CNN-News18

Updated:        May 3, 2017, 6:05 PM IST

Yes, Aadhaar Data Were Leaked: Centre to Supreme Court The picture
featuring Camp for Aadhar Card on April 12, 2013 in New Delhi, India.
(Photo by Priyanka Parashar/Mint via Getty Images)

New Delhi: The Central government on Wednesday admitted in the Supreme
Court that Aadhaar card holders’ data were indeed leaked, but
maintained that there was no leakage by the Unique Identification
Authority of India (UIDAI).

Arguing for the government, advocate Arghya Sengupta told a bench led
by Justice A K Sikri that the leakage was by various other government
departments and state agencies. Sengupta said the leakage might have
occurred on account of balancing transparency and data protection
concerns.

***As Justice Sikri pointed out that there were reports in the
newspapers even on Wednesday about leakage of Aadhaar data, Sengupta
said there could be some errors here and there and some IDs were
perhaps issued in the names of ‘Hanuman’ and dogs but UID remains the
most sophisticated and authentic biometric system.*** [Emphasis
added.]

***Sengupta was defending the government’s new law that makes Aadhaar
mandatory for having PAN cards and also for filing Income Tax returns.
He said the legislature was competent to enact Section 139AA, which
was inserted in the Income Tax Act under the Finance Act, 2017.***
[Emphasis added.]

“There is no absolute right to informational self-determination,” said
Sengupta as he added the issue was not about discriminating between
people on the basis of their having Aadhaar, but the purpose for UID
was to prevent de-duplication and to ensure targeted delivery of
services to the identified sections.

Stating that no enactment could solve a problem in entirety, the
lawyer contended that only individuals and not companies were required
to have Aadhaar since individuals were the first target. “Tomorrow, we
may replace PAN with Aadhaar if such a need arises,” he added.

Senior lawyer Shyam Divan, who represents the PIL petitioner in the
matter, rebutted Sengupta’s argument, saying it was not enough for the
Centre to say that UIDAI was not leaking data. “In the eyes of
citizen, all state authorities are State anyway,” he asserted.

Appearing for retired Major General S G Vombatkere and social activist
Bezwada Wilson, Divan questioned how the Finance Act could make
getting Aadhaar mandatory when the Aadhaar Act said obtaining UID was
completely voluntary.

“This scheme makes whole-time surveillance – from cradle to the grave
– possible. This is perhaps the worst project possible under our
Constitution. Entire architecture of Aadhaar is worthless as far as
information security is concerned. We are concerned with one-seventh
of the total population of the world in the wake of a scheme where
degree of invasion is extremely high and protection much low,” said
Divan.

He said nobody can tell him not to make a big deal of concerns about a
person’s rights.
“Civil rights movement was started by a woman who was made to sit at
the back of a bus. Nobody asked her to make a big deal of this,” added
Divan.

The arguments in the case remained inconclusive and would resume on Thursday.



-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to