[It would benefit the Minister for Information and Broadcasting not a
little if he actually gathered and vetted information before
broadcasting it.]

http://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/wheres-the-evidence-minister-venkaiah-naidu-sukma-attack-maoists-human-rights-4653323/

Where’s the evidence, minister?
Venkaiah Naidu’s attack on human rights activists ignores facts

Written by Aakar Patel | Published:May 13, 2017 12:25 am

M. Venkaiah Naidu’s article, ‘Romancing the Maoists’, (IE, May 1) , is
a piece remarkable for its disingenuousness on human rights.

It is telling that an op-ed on the “double standards” of human rights
activists comes from the pen of India’s Minister of Information and
Broadcasting. The National Democratic Alliance government has done
little to hide its hostility towards human rights activists. It is
unfortunate but not surprising therefore that Naidu’s ill-informed —
and at times downright misleading — article continues in the same
vein.

First things first: Is it true, as Naidu claims, that human rights
activists have remained silent on human rights attacks by Maoists? No.
The Sukma attack was widely condemned by groups and individuals
including the People’s Union for Civil Liberties, Soni Sori and Bela
Bhatia. Every year, Amnesty International lists in its annual human
rights report the various abuses carried out by Maoist groups and also
other groups operating in states in the Northeast and Jammu and
Kashmir. When a Maoist attack in May 2013 killed 24 people, including
three politicians, we immediately condemned the attack and pointed out
how it could lead to further violence against civilians.

In an official statement on April 25 soon after the Sukma attack,
under the heading “Why Human Rights activists silent on dastardly
killing of CRPF Jawans in Sukma?” Naidu asked this question, perhaps
rhetorically: “Are Human Rights only meant for those who chose
violence in furtherance of their outdated ideologies and not for
security personnel and common people?” The minister will in fact be
hard-pressed to find any incidents of violence by Maoist fighters
against ordinary people that have not been condemned outright by
activists. Importantly, he will also find that violence by security
forces — including fake encounters where villagers are passed off as
“Maoists” — is subjected to the same scrutiny.

And it is this objective gaze that seems to be the government’s real
grouse. There can exist only two types of voices, Naidu’s article
seems to argue: Those who support everything the government does, and
those who support Maoists. The Ministry of Information and
Broadcasting’s official statement ends on a similarly pernicious note.
It says, “There is an urgent need to build strong public opinion
against so-called human rights activists who have double standards”.

This government claims in Naidu’s statement that: “These activists
raise voice and react violently if an extremist or a terrorist is
killed by the Police but take shelter in silence when large number of
Jawans and innocent people get killed by those who operate
underground, kill and run.” This is a demonstrable lie.

This is the same sentiment that seems to drive the use of the Foreign
Contribution (Regulation) Act to suppress NGOs, the state backing of
vigilante groups who harass and attack activists, and the arbitrary
arrests of peaceful critics. Naidu’s letter may finally end up
revealing more about his government than about human rights activists.

India’s constitution and law protect its citizens and it is the right
of citizens to protest when these rights are violated, whether by
organs of the state or by armed groups.

Naidu picks and chooses, and then groups the statements and actions of
rights groups and citizens, casually ascribing motive. The most
charitable thing one can say about his allegation is that it is borne
of ignorance. That he collects his evidence from the echo chambers
that are convinced that civil society groups are up to mischief.

***It would benefit the Minister for Information and Broadcasting not
a little if he actually gathered and vetted information before
broadcasting it.*** [Emphasis added.]

The writer is executive director, Amnesty International India
-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to