[Imagine your government required you to consent to ubiquitous
stalking in order to participate in society — to do things such as log
into a wifi hotspot, register a SIM card, get your pension, or even
obtain a food ration of rice. Imagine your government was doing this
in ways your Supreme Court had indicated were illegal.
This isn’t some dystopian future, this is happening in India right
now. The government of India is pushing relentlessly to roll out a
national biometric identity database called Aadhaar, which it wants
India’s billion-plus population to use for virtually all transactions
and interactions with government services.]

https://blog.mozilla.org/netpolicy/2017/05/26/aadhaar-isnt-progress/?utm_source=newsletter-mofo&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=aadhaar&utm_content=text&utm_term=4121052

Aadhaar isn’t progress — it’s dystopian and dangerous

Jochai Ben-Avie

May 26, 2017

*This opinion piece by Mozilla Executive Chairwoman Mitchell Baker and
Mozilla community member Ankit Gadgil first appeared in the Business
Standard.*

***Imagine your government required you to consent to ubiquitous
stalking in order to participate in society — to do things such as log
into a wifi hotspot, register a SIM card, get your pension, or even
obtain a food ration of rice. Imagine your government was doing this
in ways your Supreme Court had indicated were illegal.*** [Emphasis
added.]

***This isn’t some dystopian future, this is happening in India right
now. The government of India is pushing relentlessly to roll out a
national biometric identity database called Aadhaar, which it wants
India’s billion-plus population to use for virtually all transactions
and interactions with government services.*** [Emphasis added.]

The Indian Supreme Court has directed that Aadhaar is only legal if
it’s voluntary and restricted to a limited number of schemes.
Seemingly disregarding this directive, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s
government has made verification through Aadhaar mandatory for a wide
range of government services, including vital subsidies that some of
India’s poorest citizens rely on to survive. Vital subsidies aren’t
voluntary.

Even worse, the government of India is selling access to this database
to private companies to use and combine with other datasets as they
wish. This would allow companies to have access to some of your most
intimate details and create detailed profiles of you, in ways you
can’t necessarily see or control. The government can also share user
data “in the interest of national security,” a term that remains
dangerously undefined. There are little to no protections on how
Aadhaar data is used, and certainly no meaningful user consent.
Individual privacy and security cannot be adequately protected and
users cannot have trust in systems when they do not have transparency
or a choice in how their private information will be used.

This is all possible because India currently does not have any
comprehensive national law protecting personal security through
privacy. India’s Attorney General has recently cast doubt on whether a
right to privacy exists in arguments before the Supreme Court, and has
not addressed how individual citizens can enjoy personal security
without privacy.

We have long argued that enacting a comprehensive privacy and data
protection law should be a national policy priority for India. While
it is encouraging to see the Attorney General also indicate to the
Supreme Court in a separate case that the government of India intends
to develop a privacy and data protection law by Diwali, it is not at
all clear that the draft law the government will put forward will
contain the robust protections needed to ensure the security and
privacy of individuals in India. At the same time, the government of
India is still exploiting this vacuum in legal protections by
continuing to push ahead with a massive initiative that systematically
threatens individuals’ security and privacy. The world is looking to
India to be a leader on internet policy, but it is unclear if Prime
Minister Modi’s government will seize this opportunity and
responsibility for India to take its place as a global leader on
protecting individual security and privacy.

The protection of individual security and privacy is critical to
building safe online systems. It is the lifeblood of the online
ecosystem, without which online efforts such as Aadhaar and Digital
India are likely to fail or become deeply dangerous.

One of Mozilla’s founding principles is the idea that security and
privacy on the internet are fundamental and must not be treated as
optional. This core value underlines and guides all of Mozilla’s work
on online privacy and security issues—including our product
development and design decisions and policies, and our public policy
and advocacy work. The Mozilla Community in India has also long sought
to empower Indians to protect their privacy themselves including
through national campaigns with privacy tips and tools. Yet, we also
need the government to do its part to protect individual security and
privacy.

The Mozilla Community in India has further been active in promoting
the use, development, and adoption of open source software. Aadhaar
fails here as well.

The Government of India has sought to soften the image of Aadhaar by
wrapping it in the veneer of open source. It refers to the Aadhaar API
as an “Open API” and its corporate partners as “volunteers.” As
executive chairwoman and one of the leading contributors to Mozilla,
one of the largest open source projects in the world, let us be
unequivocally clear: There’s nothing open about this. The development
was not open, the source code is not open, and companies that pay to
get a license to access this biometric identity database are not
volunteers. Moreover, requiring Indians to use Aadhaar to access so
many services dangerously intensifies the already worrying trend
toward centralisation of the internet. This is disappointing given the
government of India’s previous championing of open source technologies
and the open internet.

Prime Minister Modi and the government of India should pause the
further roll out of Aadhaar until a strong, comprehensive law
protecting individual security and privacy is passed. We further urge
a thorough and open public process around these much-needed
protections, India’s privacy law should not be passed in a rushed
manner in the dead of night as the original Aadhaar Act was. As an
additional act of openness and transparency and to enable an informed
debate, the government of India should make Aadhaar actually open
source rather than use the language of open source for an initiative
that has little if anything “open” about it. We hope India will take
this opportunity to be a beacon to the world on how citizens should be
protected.



-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to