[“I can't remember a president who has had more authoritarian
tendencies than Trump,” Sanders told me in an interview on Wednesday.
“What is going on is not only this rise of authoritarianism but also,
simultaneously, you are seeing this country move very rapidly toward
oligarchy.”
...
There has never been a president, or even a leading public official,
who has lied as often or as dangerously as Trump has.
...
And [as to] the corruption aspect of this: There is an incredible
blurring of business interests for the Trump family with public
policy. Is Trump making foreign policy decisions on behalf of the
American people and what is best for the world? Or is he making those
decisions on behalf of Trump enterprises? That’s a whole other area.
...
The American people, I think, whether you are a Republican or
Democrat, have a hard time understanding his affection for a guy like
[Russian President] Vladimir Putin, who has worked overtime to
undermine not only democracy in his own country but also democracy in
the United States.
Do you want a good relationship with Russia? Of course you do. But why
would you have what appears to be a personal affection for an
authoritarian leader? It is not just Putin. It is also [President
Rodrigo] Duterte of the Philippines; it is the royal family of Saudi
Arabia.
...
,,, You are right there is nobody who denies that Russia played a
significant role in trying to influence the election on behalf of
Trump. So the question being investigated now is was there collusion?
And you have [special counsel Robert] Mueller and his team working on
that, and you have the House and Senate Intelligence Committees
working on that. We will see where that will go.]

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/6/22/15848468/bernie-sanders-trump-dangerous-authoritarian

Bernie Sanders explains why Trump is so dangerous
“I can't remember a president who has had more authoritarian
tendencies than Trump.”

Updated by Sarah Wildman  Jun 22, 2017, 8:00am EDT

Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders may have lost his bid for the White House
in 2016, but he’s sure as hell not ready to fade into obscurity
anytime soon. Instead, he’s emerged as a gadfly, loudly and publicly
sounding the alarm on what he sees as the country’s troubling descent
into authoritarianism under President Donald Trump.

“I can't remember a president who has had more authoritarian
tendencies than Trump,” Sanders told me in an interview on Wednesday.
“What is going on is not only this rise of authoritarianism but also,
simultaneously, you are seeing this country move very rapidly toward
oligarchy.”

As Sanders prepared to give a big speech on Thursday at the Carnegie
Endowment for International Peace, he got on the phone with me to talk
about Trump’s admiration for authoritarian leaders, his attacks on the
media, the Russia investigation, and more.

Sanders told me he believes Trump has a basic disrespect for the
fundamental pillars of democracy — the press, the judicial system —
that mimics the authoritarian regimes the Trump administration has
cozied up to around the globe. And that combination, he says, is
dangerous.

What follows is a partial transcript of our conversation, lightly
edited for clarity and length.

Bernie Sanders
There has never been a president, or even a leading public official,
who has lied as often or as dangerously as Trump has.

And when the president of the United States lies a whole lot and makes
outrageous statements, it's not only bad unto itself, but it also
opens the door for other people to be lying and for truth to be
disrespected. And that is a very dangerous thing for the fabric of
American society.

When he talks about 3 to 5 million people voting illegally in the last
election — no one believes that, it is an outrageous lie —- but what
that does is tell Republican governors that they should go forward to
suppress the vote, to make it harder for people to vote, under the
guise of voter fraud.

Every politician has disagreements with the media and how they cover
this or that story, and I am certainly one of those. But there has
never been a president, or political leader, who has basically said,
“Everything you see on mainstream television or mainstream media — the
New York Times, the Washington Post, Vox, whatever it may be — is a
lie, don’t believe it.”

If you take that to its logical conclusion, and some people have, then
where do you get the truth? Where do you learn about what’s going on
that you can’t see with your own eyes? Who’s going to help you? It
kind of leads you to the conclusion that there is only one person in
America who can tell us the truth, and that is the president of the
United States.

Sarah Wildman
Do you think he’s a demagogue?

Bernie Sanders
Well, I think that ... let me continue and then you can ask me a
question, fair enough?

Sarah Wildman
Okay.

Bernie Sanders
So you have this unprecedented attack on the media. What this guy is
doing is basically telling the American people, “You cannot trust
anything in mainstream media.”

Then, on top of that, he is attacking the judiciary system and
Department of Justice. A judge rules against him — that is not
unusual; judges often rule against presidents and against legislation
— but you don't go around undermining the judiciary and calling people
“so-called judges” because they ruled against you.

Then on top of that, you have his support for authoritarian leaders.

The American people, I think, whether you are a Republican or
Democrat, have a hard time understanding his affection for a guy like
[Russian President] Vladimir Putin, who has worked overtime to
undermine not only democracy in his own country but also democracy in
the United States.

Do you want a good relationship with Russia? Of course you do. But why
would you have what appears to be a personal affection for an
authoritarian leader? It is not just Putin. It is also [President
Rodrigo] Duterte of the Philippines; it is the royal family of Saudi
Arabia.

Again: You may want to make alliances, you may not; those are debates
you have to have. But for a country like the United States, which has
been seen, historically, as one of the great promoters of democracy,
why have this affinity for so many authoritarian countries?

I have spoken to conservatives who share these exact same concerns.

Sarah Wildman
Do you see this as a global phenomenon? Why do you think we may be
seeing public support around the world for authoritarian characters or
politicians? And, go back to my original question, do you think he is
a demagogue — is that what you are moving toward saying?

Bernie Sanders
Let me take the last question first. Both good questions.

You can contrast this with a very conservative Republican president
named George W. Bush. I opposed Bush on virtually every piece
legislation, every initiative, he put forward. Virtually all of them.
But if you remember, Bush’s response to 9/11 was to visit a mosque — a
very profound statement for a conservative Republican — essentially
what he was saying is that we have to stand together, don't judge
people by religion or by the color of their skin, and that America is
a country which belongs to all of us.

Contrast that with Trump’s effort to start a program in which is he is
documenting every crime an undocumented person commits, [his] verbal
attacks against Latinos and against Muslims, and his effort, it seems
to me, to try to make political points by dividing us up by
scapegoating minorities.

That is not what a leader of any democratic country should be doing.
That is part of the tradition and history of demagoguery. It divides
people up.

That leads to your other question: Is this happening around the world?
The answer is yes, it is.

And why is it happening? For a lot of the same reasons it is happening
in the United States. The radical changes to the global economy over
the last 40 to 50 years, which have benefited some people, no question
about it, but have left behind tens and tens of millions of people who
are today working longer hours for lower wages, who are worried to
death about whether their kids can afford to go to college and whether
their kids will ever have a standard of living as high as they
themselves have.

A whole lot of people have been left behind in the global economy, in
the United States — in rural areas, in inner cities all over this
country. A lot of people have been left behind, and they are angry,
they are furious, and they think people do not understand their pain.
And then you have demagogues trying to explain that the problem is
some Mexican farm worker who makes eight bucks an hour or someone who
is a Muslim.

Tens and tens of millions of Americans today are struggling to keep
heads above water economically.

What rational leadership is about is putting those problems on the
table and saying, “All right, here are problems: We’ve got 28 million
Americans with no health insurance. How do we deal with that issue?”
rather than demagoguing about that issue and blaming minorities for
the problems the country faces.

This is certainly an international phenomenon — you see it with the
National Front in France, and you see [a] similar type phenomenon with
Putin in Russia.

Sarah Wildman
In Berlin this May, you gave a speech where you said, “What has become
absolutely clear since the election is that Donald Trump represents
something we haven’t seen before in the United States. A trend toward
authoritarianism, a normalization of corruption and the rise of
oligarchy.” Can you unpack the last part of that sentence?

Bernie Sanders
You got my quote right.

What is going on is not only this rise of authoritarianism but also,
simultaneously, you are seeing this country move very rapidly toward
oligarchy.

The media doesn't talk about it very often. I do. Because it's
frightening, and I don't think the media is comfortable with it — but
the truth is in America today, you have the top one-tenth of 1 percent
owning as much wealth as the bottom 90 percent, and you’ve got 20
people in America owning as much wealth as [the] bottom half of
America, and you are seeing 52 percent of all new income generated
today going to the top 1 percent.

So just an incredible inequality, in terms of wealth and income, that
we have not seen since the Great Depression, since 1928.

On top of that, [we have] a political system in which the Koch
brothers and other billionaires are able to spend unlimited sums
through Citizens United to buy elections for the candidates who
represent their interests.

You add that together with a media which is also increasingly owned by
fewer and fewer people around the world. I think it is fair to say we
are moving toward oligarchy, where we have an economy and a political
system controlled by few incredibly wealthy people.

And [as to] the corruption aspect of this: There is an incredible
blurring of business interests for the Trump family with public
policy. Is Trump making foreign policy decisions on behalf of the
American people and what is best for the world? Or is he making those
decisions on behalf of Trump enterprises? That’s a whole other area.

Sarah Wildman
There seems little doubt that Russians attempted in some way to
influence our election. How has this played out in terms of how you
see the Trump administration moving toward authoritarianism?

Bernie Sanders
Well, that’s a question that obviously is being investigated right
now. Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders may have lost his bid for the White
House in 2016, but he’s sure as hell not ready to fade into obscurity
anytime soon. Instead, he’s emerged as a gadfly, loudly and publicly
sounding the alarm on what he sees as the country’s troubling descent
into authoritarianism under President Donald Trump.

“I can't remember a president who has had more authoritarian
tendencies than Trump,” Sanders told me in an interview on Wednesday.
“What is going on is not only this rise of authoritarianism but also,
simultaneously, you are seeing this country move very rapidly toward
oligarchy.”

As Sanders prepared to give a big speech on Thursday at the Carnegie
Endowment for International Peace, he got on the phone with me to talk
about Trump’s admiration for authoritarian leaders, his attacks on the
media, the Russia investigation, and more.

Sanders told me he believes Trump has a basic disrespect for the
fundamental pillars of democracy — the press, the judicial system —
that mimics the authoritarian regimes the Trump administration has
cozied up to around the globe. And that combination, he says, is
dangerous.

What follows is a partial transcript of our conversation, lightly
edited for clarity and length.

Bernie Sanders
There has never been a president, or even a leading public official,
who has lied as often or as dangerously as Trump has.

And when the president of the United States lies a whole lot and makes
outrageous statements, it's not only bad unto itself, but it also
opens the door for other people to be lying and for truth to be
disrespected. And that is a very dangerous thing for the fabric of
American society.

When he talks about 3 to 5 million people voting illegally in the last
election — no one believes that, it is an outrageous lie —- but what
that does is tell Republican governors that they should go forward to
suppress the vote, to make it harder for people to vote, under the
guise of voter fraud.

Every politician has disagreements with the media and how they cover
this or that story, and I am certainly one of those. But there has
never been a president, or political leader, who has basically said,
“Everything you see on mainstream television or mainstream media — the
New York Times, the Washington Post, Vox, whatever it may be — is a
lie, don’t believe it.”

If you take that to its logical conclusion, and some people have, then
where do you get the truth? Where do you learn about what’s going on
that you can’t see with your own eyes? Who’s going to help you? It
kind of leads you to the conclusion that there is only one person in
America who can tell us the truth, and that is the president of the
United States.

Sarah Wildman
Do you think he’s a demagogue?

Bernie Sanders
Well, I think that ... let me continue and then you can ask me a
question, fair enough?

Sarah Wildman
Okay.

Bernie Sanders
So you have this unprecedented attack on the media. What this guy is
doing is basically telling the American people, “You cannot trust
anything in mainstream media.”

Then, on top of that, he is attacking the judiciary system and
Department of Justice. A judge rules against him — that is not
unusual; judges often rule against presidents and against legislation
— but you don't go around undermining the judiciary and calling people
“so-called judges” because they ruled against you.

Then on top of that, you have his support for authoritarian leaders.

The American people, I think, whether you are a Republican or
Democrat, have a hard time understanding his affection for a guy like
[Russian President] Vladimir Putin, who has worked overtime to
undermine not only democracy in his own country but also democracy in
the United States.

Do you want a good relationship with Russia? Of course you do. But why
would you have what appears to be a personal affection for an
authoritarian leader? It is not just Putin. It is also [President
Rodrigo] Duterte of the Philippines; it is the royal family of Saudi
Arabia.

Again: You may want to make alliances, you may not; those are debates
you have to have. But for a country like the United States, which has
been seen, historically, as one of the great promoters of democracy,
why have this affinity for so many authoritarian countries?

I have spoken to conservatives who share these exact same concerns.

Sarah Wildman
Do you see this as a global phenomenon? Why do you think we may be
seeing public support around the world for authoritarian characters or
politicians? And, go back to my original question, do you think he is
a demagogue — is that what you are moving toward saying?

Bernie Sanders
Let me take the last question first. Both good questions.

You can contrast this with a very conservative Republican president
named George W. Bush. I opposed Bush on virtually every piece
legislation, every initiative, he put forward. Virtually all of them.
But if you remember, Bush’s response to 9/11 was to visit a mosque — a
very profound statement for a conservative Republican — essentially
what he was saying is that we have to stand together, don't judge
people by religion or by the color of their skin, and that America is
a country which belongs to all of us.

Contrast that with Trump’s effort to start a program in which is he is
documenting every crime an undocumented person commits, [his] verbal
attacks against Latinos and against Muslims, and his effort, it seems
to me, to try to make political points by dividing us up by
scapegoating minorities.

That is not what a leader of any democratic country should be doing.
That is part of the tradition and history of demagoguery. It divides
people up.

That leads to your other question: Is this happening around the world?
The answer is yes, it is.

And why is it happening? For a lot of the same reasons it is happening
in the United States. The radical changes to the global economy over
the last 40 to 50 years, which have benefited some people, no question
about it, but have left behind tens and tens of millions of people who
are today working longer hours for lower wages, who are worried to
death about whether their kids can afford to go to college and whether
their kids will ever have a standard of living as high as they
themselves have.

A whole lot of people have been left behind in the global economy, in
the United States — in rural areas, in inner cities all over this
country. A lot of people have been left behind, and they are angry,
they are furious, and they think people do not understand their pain.
And then you have demagogues trying to explain that the problem is
some Mexican farm worker who makes eight bucks an hour or someone who
is a Muslim.

Tens and tens of millions of Americans today are struggling to keep
heads above water economically.

What rational leadership is about is putting those problems on the
table and saying, “All right, here are problems: We’ve got 28 million
Americans with no health insurance. How do we deal with that issue?”
rather than demagoguing about that issue and blaming minorities for
the problems the country faces.

This is certainly an international phenomenon — you see it with the
National Front in France, and you see [a] similar type phenomenon with
Putin in Russia.

Sarah Wildman
In Berlin this May, you gave a speech where you said, “What has become
absolutely clear since the election is that Donald Trump represents
something we haven’t seen before in the United States. A trend toward
authoritarianism, a normalization of corruption and the rise of
oligarchy.” Can you unpack the last part of that sentence?

Bernie Sanders
You got my quote right.

What is going on is not only this rise of authoritarianism but also,
simultaneously, you are seeing this country move very rapidly toward
oligarchy.

The media doesn't talk about it very often. I do. Because it's
frightening, and I don't think the media is comfortable with it — but
the truth is in America today, you have the top one-tenth of 1 percent
owning as much wealth as the bottom 90 percent, and you’ve got 20
people in America owning as much wealth as [the] bottom half of
America, and you are seeing 52 percent of all new income generated
today going to the top 1 percent.

So just an incredible inequality, in terms of wealth and income, that
we have not seen since the Great Depression, since 1928.

On top of that, [we have] a political system in which the Koch
brothers and other billionaires are able to spend unlimited sums
through Citizens United to buy elections for the candidates who
represent their interests.

You add that together with a media which is also increasingly owned by
fewer and fewer people around the world. I think it is fair to say we
are moving toward oligarchy, where we have an economy and a political
system controlled by few incredibly wealthy people.

And [as to] the corruption aspect of this: There is an incredible
blurring of business interests for the Trump family with public
policy. Is Trump making foreign policy decisions on behalf of the
American people and what is best for the world? Or is he making those
decisions on behalf of Trump enterprises? That’s a whole other area.

Sarah Wildman
There seems little doubt that Russians attempted in some way to
influence our election. How has this played out in terms of how you
see the Trump administration moving toward authoritarianism?

Bernie Sanders
Well, that’s a question that obviously is being investigated right
now. You are right there is nobody who denies that Russia played a
significant role in trying to influence the election on behalf of
Trump. So the question being investigated now is was there collusion?
And you have [special counsel Robert] Mueller and his team working on
that, and you have the House and Senate Intelligence Committees
working on that. We will see where that will go.

I don’t have the answer, and I don't want to speak before I have facts
in front of us. Trump fired [FBI Director James] Comey. Did he fire
Comey because he thought Comey was a bad FBI director and he needed a
change in the FBI? If that is the case, that is what a president can
do.

“I CAN'T REMEMBER A PRESIDENT WHO HAS HAD MORE AUTHORITARIAN
TENDENCIES THAN TRUMP”

Or did he fire Comey because Comey was launching a significant
investigation about possible collusion of the Trump campaign with
Russia? If that’s the case, then that's just another argument about
the movement of this country toward authoritarianism, because that is
obstructing justice. And that’s what’s being looked at.

Sarah Wildman
You said a few times that this is a first in American history — but
there are aspects of these issues that have repeated themselves
throughout history. Do you think this a repeat of something we saw in
the 1930s, for example, or otherwise?

Bernie Sanders

Yes and no. Yes — look, we had Joe McCarthy. But I don't know if you
have had a president whose actions —- in terms of dishonesty, clear
dishonesty, in terms of the attacks on the media, trying to undermine
people’s faith in what they see, hear, and read, and support for
authoritarian regimes — I don't know if you have had a president who
has put all of these characteristics together at one time.

I can't remember a president who has had more authoritarian tendencies
than Trump.

Sarah Wildman

What role do you think the media needs to play? What happens when you
undermine the Fourth Estate?

Bernie Sanders
Trump says, [essentially] “Hey all of these, ABC, CBS, VOX, everybody
else, anybody in the mainstream media, they are all liars, they hate
me, they are trying to undermine me, so don't believe a word of it.”

What does that tell the average person in this country? Where will
they get the truth?

That is a very profound development. After all, where do you get
truth? How do you get truth? How do you know what is going on in
Washington, DC? Is it just Trump's tweets? I think when a president
says, “This is a [news] story, I disagree with it, this is why I
disagree with it” — there’s nothing wrong with that. I do that every
day. But to say, “Everything you are seeing in the media is a lie” —
wow, that is pretty dangerous stuff.

Sarah Wildman
You mentioned the National Front earlier — there was great anxiety
that she had a chance to succeed, but actually, in the end, Marine Le
Pen, and the far right in France, was profoundly unsuccessful. What
was different there that we didn't experience here?

Bernie Sanders
Let’s not forget that if you had a popular vote that was announced at
11 pm on election night — [Hillary] Clinton won the popular vote by
2.9 million votes. That’s a difference. Emmanuel Macron did not go
through a complicated Electoral College which allowed someone who
received a minority of the votes to become president; that’s one of
the differences. That’s a good discussion. Maybe we can have it
another time.

I don’t have the answer, and I don't want to speak before I have facts
in front of us. Trump fired [FBI Director James] Comey. Did he fire
Comey because he thought Comey was a bad FBI director and he needed a
change in the FBI? If that is the case, that is what a president can
do.

“I CAN'T REMEMBER A PRESIDENT WHO HAS HAD MORE AUTHORITARIAN
TENDENCIES THAN TRUMP”

Or did he fire Comey because Comey was launching a significant
investigation about possible collusion of the Trump campaign with
Russia? If that’s the case, then that's just another argument about
the movement of this country toward authoritarianism, because that is
obstructing justice. And that’s what’s being looked at.

Sarah Wildman
You said a few times that this is a first in American history — but
there are aspects of these issues that have repeated themselves
throughout history. Do you think this a repeat of something we saw in
the 1930s, for example, or otherwise?

Bernie Sanders

Yes and no. Yes — look, we had Joe McCarthy. But I don't know if you
have had a president whose actions —- in terms of dishonesty, clear
dishonesty, in terms of the attacks on the media, trying to undermine
people’s faith in what they see, hear, and read, and support for
authoritarian regimes — I don't know if you have had a president who
has put all of these characteristics together at one time.

I can't remember a president who has had more authoritarian tendencies
than Trump.

Sarah Wildman

What role do you think the media needs to play? What happens when you
undermine the Fourth Estate?

Bernie Sanders
Trump says, [essentially] “Hey all of these, ABC, CBS, VOX, everybody
else, anybody in the mainstream media, they are all liars, they hate
me, they are trying to undermine me, so don't believe a word of it.”

What does that tell the average person in this country? Where will
they get the truth?

That is a very profound development. After all, where do you get
truth? How do you get truth? How do you know what is going on in
Washington, DC? Is it just Trump's tweets? I think when a president
says, “This is a [news] story, I disagree with it, this is why I
disagree with it” — there’s nothing wrong with that. I do that every
day. But to say, “Everything you are seeing in the media is a lie” —
wow, that is pretty dangerous stuff.

Sarah Wildman
You mentioned the National Front earlier — there was great anxiety
that she had a chance to succeed, but actually, in the end, Marine Le
Pen, and the far right in France, was profoundly unsuccessful. What
was different there that we didn't experience here?

Bernie Sanders
Let’s not forget that if you had a popular vote that was announced at
11 pm on election night — [Hillary] Clinton won the popular vote by
2.9 million votes. That’s a difference. Emmanuel Macron did not go
through a complicated Electoral College which allowed someone who
received a minority of the votes to become president; that’s one of
the differences. That’s a good discussion. Maybe we can have it
another time.



-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to