[This initiative clearly disregards the realities of the international
security environment. Accession to the ban treaty is incompatible with the
policy of nuclear deterrence, which has been essential to keeping the peace
in Europe and North Asia for over 70 years. A purported ban on nuclear
weapons that does not address the security concerns that continue to make
nuclear deterrence necessary cannot result in the elimination of a single
nuclear weapon and will not enhance any country’s security, nor
international peace and security. It will do the exact opposite by creating
even more divisions at a time when the world needs to remain united in the
face of growing threats, including those from the DPRK’s ongoing
proliferation efforts. This treaty offers no solution to the grave threat
posed by North Korea’s nuclear program, nor does it address other security
challenges that make nuclear deterrence necessary. A ban treaty also risks
undermining the existing international security architecture which
contributes to the maintenance of international peace and security.]

https://www.scribd.com/document/353174842/Joint-Press-Statement-by-UK-France-US-on-nuclear-ban-treaty


*Joint Press Statement from the Permanent Representatives to the United
Nations of the United States, United Kingdom and France following the
adoption of a treaty banning nuclear weapons*

7 July 2017

France, the United Kingdom and the United States have not taken part in the
negotiation of the treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons. We do not
intend to sign, ratify or ever become party to it. Therefore, there will be
no change in the legal obligations on our countries with respect to nuclear
weapons. For example, we would not accept any claim that this treaty
reflects or in any way contributes to the development of customary
international law. Importantly, other states possessing nuclear weapons and
almost all other states relying on nuclear deterrence have also not taken
part in the negotiations.

This initiative clearly disregards the realities of the international
security environment.  Accession to the ban treaty is incompatible with the
policy of nuclear deterrence, which has been essential to keeping the peace
in Europe and North Asia for over 70 years. A purported ban on nuclear
weapons that does not address the security concerns that continue to make
nuclear deterrence necessary cannot result in the elimination of a single
nuclear weapon and will not enhance any country’s security, nor
international peace and security. It will do the exact opposite by creating
even more divisions at a time when the world needs to remain united in the
face of
growing threats, including those from the DPRK’s ongoing proliferation
efforts.  This
treaty offers no solution to the grave threat posed by North Korea’s
nuclear program,
nor does it address other security challenges that make nuclear deterrence
necessary. A ban treaty also risks undermining the existing international
security architecture which contributes to the maintenance of international
peace and security.

We reiterate in this regard our continued commitment to the Treaty on the
Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) and reaffirm our determination
to safeguard and further promote its authority, universality and
effectiveness. Working towards the shared goal of nuclear disarmament and
general and complete disarmament must be done in a way that promotes
international peace and security, and strategic stability, based on the
principle of increased and undiminished security for all.

We all share a common responsibility to protect and strengthen our
collective security system in order to further promote international peace,
stability and security

-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to